Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reply to Dr John Melville: the scientific controversy over abusive head trauma in infants

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vinchon M, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Dhellemmes P (2005) Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: a prospective study. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 4) 102:380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinchon M, deFoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Delestret I (2010) Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: comparison of clinical, radiological and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Child's Nerv Syst 26:637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vinchon M, Delestret I, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, Noulé N (2010) Subdural hematoma in infants: can it occur spontaneously? Data from a prospective series and critical review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1195–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Vinchon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinchon, M. Reply to Dr John Melville: the scientific controversy over abusive head trauma in infants. Childs Nerv Syst 27, 207–208 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1345-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1345-1

Keywords

Navigation