Skip to main content

Third ventriculostomy in a single pediatric surgical unit

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is a successful method of treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus that has become popular over the last 20 years. The purpose of this paper is to study the outcome of infants with obstructive hydrocephalus treated by ETV by a single surgeon and to evaluate the safety, reliability, and efficacy of this treatment.

Methods

All data were collected retrospectively. Between July 1999 and June 2005, 14 children underwent an ETV. In one child, a second ETV was performed. The age of the eight female and six male patients at the time of ETV ranged from less than 1 month up to 13 years and 11 months. The indication for an ETV was an obstructive hydrocephalus. Median follow-up period was 5 years and 9 months. The need of a further operation after ETV was defined as a failure of ETV.

Results

In six patients, the first ETV was successful. In the remaining eight patients, there was a need for further treatment (ventriculoperitoneal shunt). Although the follow-up shunt failed in one patient, he was successfully treated by a second ETV.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that ETV can be successfully done in a small pediatric unit, but with a lower success rate because of small caseload, and therefore, lower experience and routine of the surgeon. Therefore, we propose a centralization of patients to obtain a higher number of cases. We confirm that ETV is a safe, reliable, and efficient method with a better outcome in children than infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Beems T, Grotenhuis JA (2004) Long-term complications and defi-nition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 20:868–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopy in the premature population. Childs Nerv Syst 14:649–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Robertson I, Punt J (2003) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy for failed shunts. Surg Neurol 60:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Ribaupierre S, Rilliet B, Vernet O, Regli L, Villneuve JG (2007) Third ventriculostomy vs ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric obstructive hydrocephalus: results from a Swiss series and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 23:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Rocco C, Massimi L, Tamburrini G (2006) Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? Childs Nerv Syst 22:1573–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng H, Huang G, Liao X, Fu K, Tan H, Pu H, Cheng Y, Liu W, Zhao D (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of obstructive hydrocephalus: an outcome analysis. J Neurosurg 100:626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuhara T, Vorster S, Luciano M (2000) Risk factors for failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 46:1100–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grotenhuis J A (1995) Manual of endoscopic procedures in neurosurgery. Uitgeverij Machaon, Nijmegen/ in Germany printed by J. Brendow und Sohn, Moers, pp 98–104

  9. Kadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D, Jones R, Vonau M, Teo Ch, Stening W, Kwok B (2005) Long-term reliabilityof endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 56:1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch D, Wagner W (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants of less than 1 year of age: which factors influence the outcome? Childs Nerv Syst 20:405–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oka K, Yamamoto M, Ikeda K, Tomonga M (1993) Flexible endoneurosurgical therapy for aqueductal stenosis. Neurosurgery 33:236–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Persson E-K, Anderson S, Wiklund L-M, Uvebrant P (2007) Hydrocephalus in children born in 1999–2002: epidemiology, outcome and opthalmological findings. Childs Nerv Syst 23:1111–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato O, Yamaguchi T, Kittaka M, Toyama H (2001) Hydrocephalus and epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 17:76–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schroeder HWS, Niendorf WR, Gaab MR (2002) Complications of endosopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg 96:1032–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siomin V, Weiner H, Cinalli G, Pierre-Kahn A, Saint-Rose C, Abbott R, Elran H, Beni-Adani L, Ouaknine G, Constantini S (2001) Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: is it worth trying? Childs Nerv Syst 17:551–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothee Egger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egger, D., Balmer, B., Altermatt, S. et al. Third ventriculostomy in a single pediatric surgical unit. Childs Nerv Syst 26, 93 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0997-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0997-1

Keywords

  • Endoscopic third ventriculostomy
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Infants
  • Outcome