Skip to main content
Log in

The ventriculoomental bursa shunt

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

The aim of this study is to access the efficacy of the omental bursa (lesser sac) as a receptacle of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to use it as an alternative to the ventriculoatrial or ventriculopleural shunts when the peritoneum reduces or loses its CSF absorption capacity.

Methods

Three patients with hydrocephalus presented with malfunctioning of ventriculoperitoneal shunts, secondary to peritoneal blockage caused by previous episodes of shunt infections in two and peritonitis in one patient. All patients underwent previous shunt revisions due to ventriculitis and shunt obstruction ranging from three to eight times. In order to keep the peritoneal cavity as the main receptacle of CSF absorption site, the distal catheter was inserted in the omental bursa, through the foramen of Winslow, jointly by a pediatric surgeon. We denominated this new technique of CSF diversion as ventriculoomental bursa (VOB) shunting. The children have been followed at least for 1 year (range 12 to 28 months) with no recurrence of shunt.

Conclusions

VOB shunting may be considered an acceptable technique to CSF shunting when the anterior peritoneum loses or decreases its CSF absorption capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agha FP, Amendola MA, Shirazi KK, Amendola BE, Chandler WF (1983) Abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts with emphasis of the role of imaging methods. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156:473–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clemente CD (ed) (1985) Anatomy of the human body. Gray’s Anatomy. 30th edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 1450–1462

    Google Scholar 

  3. Del Bigio MR (1988) Biological reactions to cerebrospinal fluid shunt devices: a review of the cellular pathology. Neurosurgery 42:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodge HW, Remine Wh, Leaens MD (1957) The treatment of hydrocephalus by spinal subarachnoid-omental bursa shunt. Minn Med 40:227–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egelhoff J, Babcock DS, McLaurin R (1985–86) Cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts: sonographic appearance and clinical management. Pediatr Neurosci 12:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Tekeli G (1996) Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts. Childs Nerv Syst 12:755–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Esposito C, Collela G, Settimi A, Centonze A, Signorelli F, Ascione G, Palmieri A, Gangemi M (2003) One-trocar laparoscopy: a valid procedure to treat abdominal complications in children with peritoneal shunt for hydrocephalus. Surg Endosc 17:828–830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forrest DM, Cooper DGW (1968) Complications of ventriculoatrial shunt: a review of 455 cases. J Neurosurg 29:506

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaskill SJ, Marlin AE (1997) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:115–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaskill SJ, Marlin AE (1989) Pseudocysts of the abdomen associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a report of twelve cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosci 15:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn YS, Engelhaard H, McLone DG (1985–86) Abdominal CSF pseudocyst. Clinical features and surgical management. Pediatr Neurosci 12:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kubo S, Ueno M, Takimoto H, Karasawa J, Kato A, Yoshimine T (2003) Endoscopically aided retroperitoneal placement of a lumboperitoneal shunt. Tecnhical note. J Neurosurg 98:430–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Longstreth G, Buckwalter N (2001) Sterile cerebrospinal fluid ascites and chronic peritonitis. N Engl J Med 345:297–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez-Lage JF, Torres J, Campillo H, Sanchez-del-Rincon I, Bueno F, Zambudio G, Poza M (2000) Ventriculopleural shunting with new technology valves. Child’s Nerv Syst 16:867–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McAuley D, Dick AC, Paterson A (2001) Peritoneography in the assessment of peritoneal cerebrospinal fluid absorption potential for distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter placement: zzechnical case report. Neurosurgery 49:1267–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piatt JH Jr (1994) How effective is ventriculopleural shunts? Pediatr Neurosurg 21:66–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Picasa JA (1956) The posterior-peritoneal shunt technique for the treatment of internal hydrocephalus in infants. J Neurosurg 13:289–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pudenz RH (1966) The ventriculo-atrial shunt. J Neurosurg 25:602–608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pudenz RH (1980) The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus—an historical review. Surg Neurol 15:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rainov N, Schobess A, Heidecke V, Burkert W (1994) Abdominal CSF Gray’s Anatomy pseudocysts in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Report of fourteen cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir 127:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rengachary SS (1997) Transdiaphragmatic ventriculoperitoneal shunting: technical case report. Neurosurgery 41:695–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roitberg BZ, Tomita T, McLone DG (1998) Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst: a complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:267–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsingoglou S, Eckstein HB (1971) Pericardial tamponade by Holter ventriculo-atrial shunts. J Neurosurg 35:695

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tubbs RS, Wellons JC 3rd, Blount JP, Grabb PA, Oakes WJ (2005) Referred shoulder pain from ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 102(2 Suppl):218–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Venes JL, Shaw RK (1979) Ventriculo-pleural shunting is the management of hydrocephalus. Child Brain 5:45–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. White B, Kroop K, Rayport M (1991) Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst: occurrence after intraperitoneal surgery in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Urol 146:583–587

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

Case report without support agency, no special device has been used in this case, and no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamilton Matushita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matushita, H., Cardeal, D., Pinto, F.C. et al. The ventriculoomental bursa shunt. Childs Nerv Syst 24, 949–953 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0591-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0591-y

Keywords

Navigation