Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Craniopharyngioma in childhood: our evidence-based approach to management

  • Special Annual Issue
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

In 1996 we published our results for treatment of childhood craniopharyngioma. That study did not only reveal that there was a significant morbidity associated with our then policy of attempted radical removal followed by post-operative radiotherapy in those cases with residual disease, but also that risk factors for poor outcome could be identified based on the clinical and radiological findings at presentation. As result of that study, we redefined the role of radical surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngioma and developed a new treatment strategy in an attempt to improve the quality of outcome without compromising tumour control. Our aims in this paper were to compare the results of our current treatment strategy with that reported in the 1996 paper to assess whether we have achieved this goal.

Methods

A detailed assessment of the treatment pathway and outcome was undertaken for children treated for craniopharyngioma in our unit from 1996 to 2004. This included a morbidity score based on visual, motor, cognitive, hypothalamic and endocrinological data obtained from our neuro-oncology database and review of clinical records. Where possible we have attempted to record data in the same manner as for our previous study allowing for meaningful comparison.

Results

Forty-eight children with craniopharyngioma presented in the study period. On the basis of clinical presentation and radiological findings, 25 were deemed suitable for attempted radical surgery and 23 were treated with various subtotal surgical procedures. Radiotherapy was used in patients over the age of 5 years where residual tumour was present or progressed after the initial surgical intervention(s). Morbidity scores, particularly in relation to visual and cognitive outcome, are improved and there was no surgical mortality in the current series.

Conclusions

A treatment paradigm for childhood craniopharyngioma is presented which improves the quality of outcome without compromising tumour control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Hayward RD, Kendall BE, Neville BG, Stanhope R (1996) Obesity in childhood craniopharyngioma: relation to post-operative hypothalamic damage shown by magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2734–2737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE, Neville BG, Stanhope R, Watkins KE, Hayward RD (1996) Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg 85:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hayward R, De Vile CJ, Brada M (2004) Craniopharyngioma. In: Walker D, Perilongo G, Punt J, Taylor R (eds) Brain and spinal tumours of childhood. Arnold, London, pp 370–386

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI (1992) Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 76:47–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang JK, Lee KS, Hong YK, Jeun SS, Kim MC (2005) Endocrine management following craniopharyngioma surgery in children. Childs Nerv Syst 19:625

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mottolese C, Stan H, Hermier M, Berlier P, Convert J, Frappaz D, Lapras C (2001) Intracystic chemotherapy with bleomycin in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 17:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanford RA (1994) Craniopharyngioma: results of survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 21(Suppl 1):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wisoff JH, Sands S, Moliterno J, Milner J (2005) Functional outcome following radical resection of primary and recurrent craniopharyngioma. Childs Nerv Syst 19:624

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yasargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P (1990) Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 73:3–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. M. Powell, Consultant Neurosurgeon (National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square) for providing his expertise in trans-sphenoidal surgery in the management of our patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, D., Phipps, K. & Hayward, R. Craniopharyngioma in childhood: our evidence-based approach to management. Childs Nerv Syst 21, 660–668 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1210-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1210-9

Keywords

Navigation