Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introduction of a urodynamic score to detect pre- and postoperative neurological deficits in children with a primary tethered cord

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

An increasing number of asymptomatic children are diagnosed with occult spinal dysraphism, raising the question of their optimal management. Urodynamic study (UDS) is the most reliable method of detecting neuro-urological abnormalities in these children. The rate of postoperative retethering ranges from 10 to 20% and is not always immediately clinically significant. The aim of this prospective study was to develop a reliable method that could be used in the preoperative assessment and postoperative follow-up of children with a tethered cord syndrome (TCS).

Methods

From 1989 to 1997, 15 children underwent spinal cord untethering for TCS. Preoperatively, patients were assessed with MRI and UDS. Postoperative UDS were repeated at 6- to 12-month intervals. Four UDS parameters were identified, graded, and added to obtain a UDS score. A group of 38 children without dysraphic condition was used as control and allowed the calculation of a normal score.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant difference in the preoperative UDS scores between the control group and the study group (p<0.001). Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in UDS scores. UDS score is a reliable tool for identifying and quantifying neuro-urological disorders in patients with TCS. Postoperatively, this score was useful in the early diagnosis of spinal cord retethering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer SB (1992) Neuropathy of the lower urinary tract. In: Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB (eds) Clinical pediatric urology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 399–440

  2. Brading AF, Turner WH (1994) The unstable bladder: towards a common mechanism. Br J Urol 73:3–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chancellor MB, Kaplan SA, Blaivas JG (1990) Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. Ciba Found Symp 151:195–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colak A, Pollack IF, Albright AL (1998) Recurrent tethering: a common long-term problem after lipomyelomeningocele repair. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:184–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DiPietro MA, Venes JL (1988) Real-time sonography of the pediatric spinal cord: horizons and limits. Concepts in pediatric neurosurgery, vol 8. Karger, Basel, pp 120–132

  6. Foster LS, Kogan BA, Cogen PH, Edwards MS (1990) Bladder function in patients with lipomyelomeningocele. J Urol 143:984–986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galloway NT, Mekras JA, Helms M, Webster GD (1991) An objective score to predict upper tract deterioration in myelodysplasia. J Urol 145:535–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garceau GJ (1953) The filum terminale syndrome (the cord traction syndrome). J Bone Joint Surg Am 35:711–716

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gross AJ, Michael T, Godeman F, Weigel K, Huland H (1993) Urological findings in patients with neurosurgically treated tethered spinal cord. J Urol 149:1510–1511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellstrom WJG, Edwards MSB, Kogan BA (1986) Urological aspects of the tethered cord syndrome. J Urol 135:317–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hjalmas K (1988) Urodynamics in normal infants and children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 114 [Suppl]:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Houle AM, Gilmour RF, Churchill BM, Gaumond M, Bissonnette B (1993) What volume can a child normally store in the bladder at a safe pressure? J Urol 149:561–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Houser EE, Bartholomew TH, Cookson MS, Marlin AE, Little NA (1994) A prospective evaluation of leak point pressure, bladder compliance and clinical status in myelodysplasia patients with tethered spinal cords. J Urol 51:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson DL, Levy LM (1995) Predicting outcome in the tethered cord syndrome: a study of cord motion. Pediatr Neurosurg 22:115–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan SA, Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG (1991) Bladder and sphincter behaviour in patients with spinal cord lesions. J Urol 146:113–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keating MA, Rink RC, Bauer SB, Karup C, Dyro FM, Winston KR, Shillito J, Fischer EG, Retik AB (1988) Neurourological implications of the changing approach in management of occult spinal lesions. J Urol 140:1299–1301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoury AE, Hendrick EB, McLorie GA, Kulkarni A, Churchill BM (1990) Occult spinal dysraphism: clinical and urodynamic outcome after division of the filum terminale. J Urol 144:426–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kondo A, Kato K, Kanai S, Sakakibara T (1986) Bladder dysfunction secondary to tethered cord syndrome in adults: is it curable? J Urol 135:313–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Norgaard JP, Van Gool JD, Hjalmas, Djurhuus JC, Hellstrom AL (1998) Standardization and definitions in lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. Br J Urol 81 [Suppl 3]:1–16

  20. O’Neill P, Stack JP (1990–1991) Magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of closed spinal dysraphism in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:240–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Palmer LS, Richards I, Kaplan WE (1998) Subclinical changes in bladder function in children presenting with non urological symptoms of the tethered cord syndrome. J Urol 159:231–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M, Renier D, Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Lellouch-Tubiana A, Brunelle F, Le Merrer M, Giudicelli Y, Pichon J, Kleinknecht B, Nataf F (1997) Congenital lumbosacral lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst 13:298–334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roy MW, Gilmore R, Walsh JW (1986) Evaluation of children and young adults with tethered spinal cord syndrome. Utility of spinal and scalp recorded somatosensory evoked potentials. Surg Neurol 26:241–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tani S, Yamada S, Knighton RS (1987) Extensibility of the lumbar and sacral cord. Pathophysiology of the tethered spinal cord in cats. J Neurosurg 66:116–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Gool JD, Dick P, de Jong TP (2001) Bladder-sphincter dysfunction in myelomeningocele. Eur J Pediatr 160:414–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vernet O, Farmer JP, Houle AM, Montes JL (1996) Impact of urodynamic studies on the surgical management of spinal cord tethering. J Neurosurg 85:555–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vernet O, O’Gorman AM, Farmer JP, McPhillips M, Montes JM (1996) Use of the prone position in the MRI evaluation of spinal cord retethering. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:286–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamada S, Zinke DE, Sanders D (1981) Pathophysiology of “tethered cord syndrome”. J Neurosurg 54:494–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yip CM, Leach GE, Rosenfeld DS, Zimmen P, Raz S (1985) Delayed diagnosis of voiding dysfunction: occult spinal dysraphism. J Urol 134:694–697

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blaise Julien Meyrat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyrat, B.J., Tercier, S., Lutz, N. et al. Introduction of a urodynamic score to detect pre- and postoperative neurological deficits in children with a primary tethered cord. Childs Nerv Syst 19, 716–721 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0829-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0829-7

Keywords

Navigation