Skip to main content
Log in

New orbitozygomatic approach by craniotomy

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The orbitozygomatic extension technique described by Sekhar and Wright requires a temporal basal craniectomy that must be done in order to make osteotomy dissections. In the present work, a technique that includes the base and squamous temporal bone and a craniotomy instead of a craniectomy is shown.

Method

The temporal and masseter muscles are dissected and separated from the temporal and zygomatic bones to facilitate passing them through the zygomatic arch in a caudal direction, which allows a frontotemporal basal craniotomy. Intracranially, a trepan that communicates to the glenoid cavity is done, which permits a temporal basal cut using the pneumatic drill saw. This is done in order to join with the orbital wall osteotomies, which were done in this approach with the craniotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–f.
Fig. 2a–d.
Fig. 3a–d.
Fig. 4a–d.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mefty O (1987) Supraorbital-pterional approach to the skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 21:474–477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asís KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL et al (2002) The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guerrero FJ, Peña R, Ibarra A (2003) Exposición temporal basal por medio de la desinserción de los músculos temporal y masetero a través del canal cigomático. Descripción de la técnica y presentación de un caso. Arch Neurociencias 8:104–107

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hakuba A, Liu SS, Nishimura S (1986) The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique. Surg Neurol 26:271–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson IT (1990) Craniofacial osteotomies to facilitate the resection of tumors of the skull base. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (ed) Neurosurgery update I. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 277–291

  6. Lesoin F, Pellerin P, Villette L et al (1986) Intérêt de la mobilisation du volet orbito-zygomatico-malaire. Neurochirurgie 32:90–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Natori Y, Rhoton AL Jr (1995) Microsurgical anatomy of the superior orbital fissure. Neurosurgery 36:762–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oikawa S, Mizuno M, Muraoka S et al (1996) Retrograde dissection of the temporalis muscle preventing muscle atrophy for pterional craniotomy. J Neurosurg 84:297–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sekhar LN, Wright DC (1996) Preauricular subtemporal-infratemporal and combined approaches to the cranial base. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1655–1666

  10. Sekhar LN, Schramm VL Jr, Jones NF (1987) Subtemporal-periauricular infratemporal fossa approach to large lateral and posterior cranial base neoplasms. J Neurosurg 67:488–499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sekhar LN, Janecka IP, Jones NF (1988) Subtemporal-infratemporal and basal subfrontal approach to extensive cranial base tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 92:83–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Guerrero Jazo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerrero Jazo, F.J. New orbitozygomatic approach by craniotomy. Childs Nerv Syst 20, 50–54 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0806-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0806-1

Keywords

Navigation