Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome and microbiological findings of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a multifactorial disease that leads to increased morbidity and mortality.

Objective

The aim was to analyze patient-, disease- and treatment-related characteristics including microbiological and bacterial spectrum according to survival status and to identify risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality in patients with local and systemic CIED infection.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with CIED-related local or systemic infection undergoing successful transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Survival status as well as incidence and cause of rehospitalization were recorded. Microbiology and antibiotics used as first-line therapy were compared according to mortality. Independent risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality were determined.

Results

Data from 243 Patients were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was 2.5%. Mortality rates at 30 days, 1- and 3 years were 4.1%, 18.1% and 30%, respectively. Seventy-four (30.5%) patients had systemic bacterial infection. Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality included age (OR 1.05 [1.01–1.10], p = 0.014), NT-proBNP at admission (OR 4.18 [1.81–9.65], p = 0.001), new onset or worsened tricuspid regurgitation after TLE (OR 6.04 [1.58–23.02], p = 0.009), and systemic infection (OR 2.76 [1.08–7.03], p = 0.034), whereas systemic infection was no longer an independent risk factor for 3-year mortality. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 18.1% of patients who survived and in 25% of those who died, p = 0.092. There was a high proportion of methicillin-resistant strains among coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.5%) compared to Staphylococcus aureus (1.2%).

Conclusions

Staphylococci are the most common causative germs of CIED-infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci showing higher resistance rates to antibiotics. The independent risk factors for increased long-term mortality could contribute to individual risk stratification and well-founded treatment decisions in clinical routine. Especially the role of tricuspid regurgitation as a complication after TLE should be investigated in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Mond HG, Proclemer A (2011) The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009—a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bongiorni MG, Burri H, Deharo JC, Starck C, Kennergren C, Saghy L, Rao A, Tascini C, Lever N, Kutarski A, Fernandez Lozano I, Strathmore N, Costa R, Epstein L, Love C, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, ESC Scientific Document Group (2018) 2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS. Europace 20:1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyagi Y, Sakamoto SI, Kawase Y, Oomori H, Watanabe Y, Kurita J, Maruyama Y, Sasaki T, Ishii Y (2021) Temporal and microbiological analysis of cardiac implantable electrical device infections—a retrospective study. Circ Rep 3:488–496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Le KY, Sohail MR, Friedman PA, Uslan DZ, Cha SS, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Baddour LM, Mayo Cardiovascular Infections Study Group (2011) Clinical predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34:450–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, Poole J, Boriani G, Costa R, Deharo JC, Epstein LM, Saghy L, Snygg-Martin U, Starck C, Tascini C, Strathmore N, ESC Scientific Document Group (2020) European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace 22:515–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olsen T, Jørgensen OD, Nielsen JC, Thøgersen AM, Philbert BT, Frausing MHJP, Sandgaard NCF, Johansen JB (2022) Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infections: a nationwide Danish study. Eur Heart J 43:4946–4956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Krahn AD, Longtin Y, Philippon F, Birnie DH, Manlucu J, Angaran P, Rinne C, Coutu B, Low RA, Essebag V, Morillo C, Redfearn D, Toal S, Becker G, Degrâce M, Thibault B, Crystal E, Tung S, LeMaitre J, Sultan O, Bennett M, Bashir J, Ayala-Paredes F, Gervais P, Rioux L, Hemels MEW, Bouwels LHR, van Vlies B, Wang J, Exner DV, Dorian P, Parkash R, Alings M, Connolly SJ (2018) Prevention of arrhythmia device infection trial: the PADIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:3098–3109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarakji KG, Mittal S, Kennergren C, Corey R, Poole JE, Schloss E, Gallastegui J, Pickett RA, Evonich R, Philippon F, McComb JM, Roark SF, Sorrentino D, Sholevar D, Cronin E, Berman B, Riggio D, Biffi M, Khan H, Silver MT, Collier J, Eldadah Z, Wright DJ, Lande JD, Lexcen DR, Cheng A, Wilkoff BL, WRAP-IT Investigators (2019) Antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable device infection. N Engl J Med 380:1895–1905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunner MP, Yu C, Hussein AA, Tarakji KG, Wazni OM, Kattan MW, Wilkoff BL (2015) Nomogram for predicting 30-day all-cause mortality after transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction. Heart Rhythm 12:2381–2386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deshmukh A, Patel N, Noseworthy PA, Patel AA, Patel N, Arora S, Kapa S, Noheria A, Mulpuru S, Badheka A, Fischer A, Coffey JO, Cha YM, Friedman P, Asirvatham S, Viles-Gonzalez JF (2015) Trends in use and adverse outcomes associated with transvenous lead removal in the United States. Circulation 132:2363–2371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta VS, Elliott MK, Sidhu BS, Gould J, Kemp T, Vergani V, Kadiwar S, Shetty AK, Blauth C, Gill J, Bosco P, Rinaldi CA (2021) Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: importance of indication and comorbidities. Heart Rhythm 18:1566–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oszczygieł E, Kutarski A, Oszczygieł A, Mańkowska-Załuska B, Chudzik M, Wranicz JK, Cygankiewicz I (2017) Risk score to assess mortality risk in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 40:918–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sood N, Martin DT, Lampert R, Curtis JP, Parzynski C, Clansy J (2018) Incidence and predictors of perioperative complications with transvenous lead extractions: real-world experience with national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11(2):e004768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wazni O, Epstein LM, Carrillo RG, Love C, Adler SW, Riggio DW, Karim SS, Bashir J, Greenspon AJ, DiMarco JP, Cooper JM, Onufer JR, Ellenbogen KA, Kutalek SP, Dentry-Mabry S, Ervin CM, Wilkoff BL (2010) Lead extraction in the contemporary setting: the LExICon study: an observational retrospective study of consecutive laser lead extractions. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:579–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Chami MF, Liu Y, Griffiths RI, Knight BP, Weiss R, Mark GE, Biffi M, Probst V, Lambiase PD, Miller MA, Jacobsen CM, Baddour LM (2022) Device-related infection associated with increased mortality risk in de novo transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator medicare patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 33:725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rizwan Sohail M, Henrikson CA, Jo Braid-Forbes M, Forbes KF, Lerner DJ (2015) Increased long-term mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 38:231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung DU, Burger H, Kaiser L, Osswald B, Bärsch V, Nägele H, Knaut M, Reichenspurner H, Gessler N, Willems S, Butter C, Pecha S, Hakmi S, GALLERY investigators (2023) Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: a GALLERY subgroup-analysis. Heart Rhythm 20(2):181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandoe JA, Barlow G, Chambers JB, Gammage M, Guleri A, Howard P, Olson E, Perry JD, Prendergast BD, Spry MJ, Steeds RP, Tayebjee MH, Watkin R, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, British Heart Rhythm Society, British Cardiovascular Society, British Heart Valve Society, British Society for Echocardiography (2015) Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of implantable cardiac electronic device infection. Report of a joint Working Party project on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC, host organization), British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS), British Cardiovascular Society (BCS), British Heart Valve Society (BHVS) and British Society for Echocardiography (BSE). J Antimicrob Chemother 70:325–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polyzos KA, Konstantelias AA, Falagas ME (2015) Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 17:767–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palmisano P, Accogli M, Zaccaria M, Luzzi G, Nacci F, Anaclerio M, Favale S (2013) Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantable device complications requiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy. Europace 15:531–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prutkin JM, Reynolds MR, Bao H, Curtis JP, Al-Khatib SM, Aggarwal S, Uslan DZ (2014) Rates of and factors associated with infection in 200 909 Medicare implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implants: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 130:1037–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao A, Garner D, Starck C, Kirkfeldt RE, Dagres N, Didier K, Montano N, Heidbuchel H (2020) Knowledge gaps, lack of confidence, and system barriers to guideline implementation among European physicians managing patients with CIED lead or infection complications: a European Heart Rhythm Association/European Society of Cardiology educational needs assessment survey. Europace 22:1743–1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bongiorni MG, Kennergren C, Butter C, Deharo JC, Kutarski A, Rinaldi CA, Romano SL, Maggioni AP, Andarala M, Auricchio A, Kuck KH, Blomström-Lundqvist C, ELECTRa Investigators, (2017) The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Registry of transvenous lead extraction outcomes. Eur Heart J 38:2995–3005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baman TS, Gupta SK, Valle JA, Yamada E (2009) Risk factors for mortality in patients with cardiac device-related infection. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2:129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Athan E, Chu VH, Tattevin P, Selton-Suty C, Jones P, Naber C, Miró JM, Ninot S, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Durante-Mangoni E, Spelman D, Hoen B, Lejko-Zupanc T, Cecchi E, Thuny F, Hannan MM, Pappas P, Henry M, Fowler VG Jr, Crowley AL, Wang A, ICE-PCS Investigators (2012) Clinical characteristics and outcome of infective endocarditis involving implantable cardiac devices. JAMA 307:1727–1735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deharo JC, Quatre A, Mancini J, Khairy P, Le Dolley Y, Casalta JP, Peyrouse E, Prévôt S, Thuny F, Collart F, Raoult D, Habib G, Franceschi F (2012) Long-term outcomes following infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a prospective matched cohort study. Heart 98:724–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Habib A, Le KY, Baddour LM, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Lohse CM, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Sohail MR, Mayo Cardiovascular Infections Study Group (2013) Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Am J Cardiol 111:874–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Diemberger I, Biffi M, Lorenzetti S, Martignani C, Raffaelli E, Ziacchi M, Rapezzi C, Pacini D, Boriani G (2018) Predictors of long-term survival free from relapses after extraction of infected CIED. Europace 20:1018–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klug D, Lacroix D, Savoye C, Goullard L, Grandmougin D, Hennequin JL, Kacet S, Lekieffre J (1997) Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads: clinical presentation and management. Circulation 95:2098–2107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le KY, Sohail MR, Friedman PA, Uslan DZ, Cha SS, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Baddour LM, Mayo Cardiovascular Infections Study Group (2011) Impact of timing of device removal on mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Heart Rhythm 8:1678–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C (2002) Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulasenegative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2:677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G (2014) Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:870–926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Polewczyk A, Jacheć W, Polewczyk AM, Tomasik A, Janion M, Kutarski A (2017) Infectious complications in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: risk factors, prevention, and prognosis. Pol Arch Intern Med 127:597–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Santaguida PL, Don-Wauchope AC, Oremus M, McKelvie R, Ali U, Hill SA, Balion C, Booth RA, Brown JA, Bustamam A, Sohel N, Raina P (2014) BNP and NT-proBNP as prognostic markers in persons with acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev 19:453–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li H, Zeng Z, Cheng J, Hu G, Li Y, Wei L, Zhou Y, Ran P (2020) Prognostic role of NT-proBNP for in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 15:57–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Birgersdotter-Green U, Dawood FZ (2018) Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads and the risk of tricuspid valve regurgitation: making a case for thoughtful lead management. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:1429–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funded by the Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) publication fund supported by DFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lara C. Schipmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was performed in compliance with the principals outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) (E-01-20200809).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Laboratory results according to 1-year mortality

 

Survived

n = 199

Died

n = 44

p-Value

At admission

 Haemoglobin [mmol/L]

7.9 (7.2–8.8)

7.4 (6.2–8.3)

0.009

 Thrombocytes [103/µL]

221 (169–273)

204 (142–263)

0.209

 Leukocytes [Gpt/L]

8.1 (6.7–10.0)

8.2 (6.8–11.9)

0.301

 CRP [mg/L]

9.0 (3.0–33.9)

37.2 (10.1–99.8)

 < 0.001

 NT-proBNP [pg/mL]

1109 (356–3425)

3803 (1254–9063)

 < 0.001

 Creatinine [µmol/L]

96 (79.0–131.0)

112.5 (73.0–178.0)

0.136

 eGFR [mL/min/1.73]

66 (48–89)

54 (32–84)

0.040

At discharge

 Haemoglobin [mmol/L]

6.6 (6.0–7.4)

6.4 (5.6–7.1)

0.063

 Thrombocytes [103/µL]

215 (166–281)

209 (142–306)

0.734

 Leukocytes [Gpt/L]

7.2 (6.0–9.1)

8.7 (7.1–11.4)

0.003

 CRP [mg/L]

26.4 (13.3–59.0)

49.7 (18.5–76.1)

0.018

 Creatinine [µmol/L]

92 (75–134)

130 (88–190)

0.004

 eGFR [mL/min/1.73]

69 (46–86)

46 (28–77)

0.003

Difference in laboratory results from admission to discharge

 △Haemoglobin [mmol/L]

1.2 (0.6–1.8)

1 (0.45–1.55)

0.160

 △ Thrombocytes [103/µL]

−7 (−46–43)

15 (−37–63)

0.421

 △Leukocytes [Gpt/L]

0.7 (−0.5–2.1)

0 (−1.7–2.0)

0.136

 △CRP [mg/L]

−11.2 (−29.8–5.8)

1.3 (−17.5–26.8)

0.013

 △eGFR [mL/min/1.73]

0.0 (−9.0–6.0)

1 (−8–14)

0.360

 △Creatinine [µmol/L]

4.0 (−9.0–17)

−1.0 (−38.5–17.5)

0.180

  1. CRP C-reactive protein, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

Antibiotics used as first-line therapy according to 1-year mortality

 

Survived

n = 199

Died

n = 44

p-Value

Flucloxacillin

39 (19.6%)

9 (20.5%)

0.897

Amoxicillin

2 (1.0%)

1 (2.3%)

0.491

Ampicillin/sulbactam

16 (8.0%)

3 (6.8%)

0.785

Piperacillin/tazobactam

11 (5.5%)

4 (9.1%)

0.374

Cefuroxime

50 (25.1%)

7 (15.9%)

0.192

Ceftriaxone

2 (1.0%)

3 (6.8%)

0.014

Meropenem

6 (3.0%)

4 (9.1%)

0.066

Ciprofloxacin

7 (3.5%)

1 (2.3%)

0.675

Vancomycin

36 (18.1%)

12 (27.3%)

0.166

Gentamicin

13 (6.5%)

4 (9.1%)

0.547

Clindamycin

27 (13.6%)

3 (6.8%)

0.218

Linezolid

4 (2.0%)

1 (2.3%)

0.912

Daptomycin

5 (2.5%)

3 (6.8%)

0.147

Rifampicin

16 (8.0%)

5 (11.4%)

0.478

Cotrimoxazole

3 (1.5%)

0 (0%)

0.412

Mortality table

Interval [days]

Number of patients entering Interval

Number of deaths

Cumulative proportion surviving at end of interval

0

243

16

0.93

50

227

8

0.90

100

218

3

0.89

150

215

4

0.87

200

211

3

0.86

250

208

5

0.84

300

203

1

0.84

350

202

4

0.82

400

198

6

0.79

450

191

4

0.78

500

187

0

0.78

550

187

2

0.77

600

185

1

0.76

650

184

0

0.76

700

184

2

0.76

750

182

1

0.75

800

181

0

0.75

850

181

1

0.75

900

180

1

0.74

950

179

4

0.73

1000

175

2

0.72

1050

172

5

0.70

1100

164

0

0.70

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schipmann, L.C., Moeller, V., Krimnitz, J. et al. Outcome and microbiological findings of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection. Heart Vessels (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02380-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02380-y

Keywords

Navigation