Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Catheter-related thrombosis after cardiac surgery in patients with both central venous and pulmonary artery catheters inserted into the right internal jugular vein: a single-center, prospective, observational study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 1 Altmetric

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) and pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are widely used in intensive care and perioperative management. The detection and prevention of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) are important because CRT is a complication of catheter use and can cause pulmonary embolism and bloodstream infection. Currently, there is no evidence for CRT in patients using both CVC and PAC. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study to identify the incidence, timing, and risk factors for CRT in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery and using a combination of CVC and PAC through the right internal jugular vein (RIJV). Out of 50 patients, CRT was observed using ultrasonography in 39 patients (78%), and the median time of CRT formation was 1 day (interquartile range: 1–1.5) after catheter insertion. The mean duration of PAC placement was 3 days (interquartile range: 2–5), and the maximum diameter of CRT was 12 mm (interquartile range: 10–15). In short-axis images, CRT occupied more than half of the cross-sectional area of the RIJV in five patients (10%), and CRT completely occluded the RIJV in one patient (2%). Platelet count, duration of PAC placement, and intraoperative bleeding amount were found to be high-risk indicators of CRT. In conclusion, patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and using both CVC and PAC had a high incidence of CRT. Avoiding unnecessary PAC placement and early removal of catheters in patients at high risk of developing CRT may prevent the development of CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, Martin JB, Misset B, Renaud B, Carlet J (1998) Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risks factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest 114:207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Fishman N, Fuchs B, Kolansky DM, Kasner S, Pryor J, Chittams J (2010) Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation. Radiology 256:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh CS, Rhee KY, Yoon TG, Kim SH (2016) Assessment of thrombosis in right internal jugular vein after percutaneous superior vena cava catheter insertion during cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152:1592–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen PT, Chang KC, Hu KL, Ting CK, Chan KH, Chang WK (2017) Catheter-related right internal jugular vein thrombosis after chest surgery. Br J Anaesth 119:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Geerts W (2014) Central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2014:306–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Judge O, Ji F, Fleming N, Liu H (2015) Current use of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery: a survey study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A, Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN (2014) 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 130:2215–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, DiSesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr, Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, LangeRA LMJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC, Winniford MD, Jacobs AK, Anderson JL, Albert N, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Kushner FG, Ohman EM, Stevenson W, Yancy CW, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (2012) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:4–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bossert T, Gummert JF, Bittner HB, Barten M, Walther T, Falk V, Mohr FW (2006) Swan-Ganz catheter-induced severe complications in cardiac surgery: right ventricular perforation, knotting, and rupture of a pulmonary artery. J Card Surg 21:292–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sato D, Ikeda S, Koga S, Yamagata Y, Eguchi M, Yonekura T, Tsuneto A, Yoshimuta T, Koide Y, Kawano H, Maemura K (2019) Effectiveness and safety of oral direct factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and/or older age. Heart Vessels 34:678–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller K, Hobohm L, Engelhardt M (2019) Risk of venous thromboembolism after endoprosthetic surgeries: lower versus upper extremity endoprosthetic surgeries. Heart Vessels 34:815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwann NM, Hillel Z, Hoeft A, Barash P, Möhnle P, Miao Y, Mangano DT (2011) Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 113:994–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barone JE, Tucker JB, Rassias D, Corvo PR (2001) Routine perioperative pulmonary artery catheterization has no effect on rate of complications in vascular surgery: a meta-analysis. Am Surg 67:674–679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G, Califf RM (2005) Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294:1664–1670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, Brampton W, Williams D, Young D, Rowan K, PAC-Man study collaboration (2005) Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:472–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the medical staff at the ICU of the Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital for data collection and their helpful advice. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for support of statistical analysis and English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Seino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Idei, M., Seino, Y., Sato, N. et al. Catheter-related thrombosis after cardiac surgery in patients with both central venous and pulmonary artery catheters inserted into the right internal jugular vein: a single-center, prospective, observational study. Heart Vessels 37, 691–696 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01955-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01955-3

Keywords

Navigation