Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes after balloon angioplasty with Crosser device for heavily calcified common femoral and popliteal artery disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on the mid-term clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) using a Crosser catheter (C. R. Bard, Inc.) as a crossing or flossing device for a heavily calcified lesion in the common femoral artery (CFA) or popliteal artery (PA) are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of EVT using a Crosser catheter for isolated and heavily calcified CFA or PA disease. We retrospectively analyzed 64 consecutive patients (72 lesions; CFA 30, PA 42) who underwent EVT for heavily calcified CFA or PA lesions with Crosser catheters between April 2015 and April 2019. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The median follow-up was 18.5 months. The mean age of the study population was 70 ± 9.5 years, with a male prevalence of 73.6%. The mean Proposed Peripheral Artery Calcification Scoring System grade was 2.9 ± 0.9. Procedure success, defined as 50% or less residual stenosis without suboptimal results, was achieved in 94.4% of lesions. There were no cases of bailout stenting or target lesion-related complications. After EVT, the 1-year CD-TLR-free rate for CFA and PA lesions was 87.4 and 76.8%, respectively. The corresponding rates at 2 years were 82.2 and 62.8%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis used to define CD-TLR predictors for CFA and PA lesions, hemodialysis was the only independent predictor (HR 3.35, 95% CI 1.02–13.95, P = 0.045). EVT with a Crosser device for heavily calcified CFA and PA lesions seems to be safe and feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The data of our study are unavailable to access because it is confidential.

References

  1. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Ikeda Y, Mas JL, Goto S, Liau CS, Richard AJ, Röther J, Wilson PW, REACH Registry Investigators (2006) International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA 295:180–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumann F, Ruch M, Willenberg T, Dick F, Do DD, Keo HH, Baumgartner I, Diehm N (2011) Endovascular treatment of common femoral artery obstructions. J Vasc Surg 53:1000–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Silva JA, White CJ, Quintana H, Collins TJ, Jenkins JS, Ramee SR (2004) Percutaneous revascularization of the common femoral artery for limb ischemia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonvini RF, Rastan A, Sixt S, Noory E, Schwarz T, Frank U, Roffi M, Dorsaz PA, Schwarzwälder U, Bürgelin K, Macharzina R, Zeller T (2011) Endovascular treatment of common femoral artery disease: medium-term outcomes of 360 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:792–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballotta E, Gruppo M, Mazzalai F, Da Giau G (2010) Common femoral artery endarterectomy for occlusive disease: an 8-year single-center prospective study. Surgery 147:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakao M, Yamaguchi J, Otsuki H, Arashi H, Hagiwara N (2019) Clinical outcomes of high-pressure balloon angioplasty for common femoral artery disease in contemporary practice. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 34:340–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liang GZ, Zhang FX (2013) Novel devices and specialized techniques in recanalization of peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTOs)—a literature review. Int J Cardiol 165:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laird J, Joye J, Sachdev N, Huang P, Caputo R, Mohiuddin I, Runyon J, Das T (2014) Recanalization of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions with the Crosser system: results of the PATRIOT trial. J Invasive Cardiol 26:497–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan M, Urasawa K, Koshida R, Haraguchi T, Kitani S, Nakagawa Y, Igarashi Y, Sato K (2018) Evaluation for the efficacy and safety of the Crosser catheter as a CTO crossing device and a flossing device. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 33:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Igari K, Kudo T, Toyofuku T, Inoue Y (2016) A novel approach to infrainguinal arteries with chronic total occlusions using the high frequency vibrational device. Int Angiol 35:212–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalid MR, Khalid FR, Farooqui FA, Devireddy CM, Robertson GC, Niazi K (2010) A novel catheter in patients with peripheral chronic total occlusions: a single center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gandini R, Volpi T, Pipitone V, Simonetti G (2009) Intraluminal recanalization of long infrainguinal chronic total occlusions using the Crosser system. J Endovasc Ther 16:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Staniloae CS, Mody KP, Yadav SS, Han SY, Korabathina R (2011) Endoluminal treatment of peripheral chronic total occlusions using the Crosser® recanalization catheter. J Invasive Cardiol 23:359–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okuno S, Iida O, Shiraki T, Fujita M, Masuda M, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, Kanda T, Takahara M, Uematsu M (2016) Impact of calcification on clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy for superficial femoral artery disease: assessment using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system. J Endovasc Ther 23:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsujimura T, Iida O, Fujita M, Masuda M, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, Kanda T, Okuno S, Matsuda Y, Fujihara M, Yokoi Y, Mano T (2018) Two-year clinical outcomes post implantation of Epic self-expanding nitinol stents for the aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Atheroscler Thromb 25:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katsuki T, Yamaji K, Tomoi Y, Hiramori S, Soga Y, Ando K (2020) Clinical impact of improvement in the ankle-brachial index after endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease. Heart Vessels 35:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soga Y, Tomoi Y, Sato K, Iida O, Yokoi H (2013) Clinical outcome after endovascular treatment for isolated common femoral and popliteal artery disease. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 28:250–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies RS, Adair W, Bolia A, Fishwick G, Sayers RD, McCarthy MJ (2013) Endovascular treatment of the common femoral artery for limb ischemia. Vasc Endovascular Surg 47:639–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Semaan E, Hamburg N, Nasr W, Shaw P, Eberhardt R, Woodson J, Doros G, Rybin D, Farber A (2010) Endovascular management of the popliteal artery: comparison of atherectomy and angioplasty. Vasc Endovascular Surg 44:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rastan A, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Blessing E, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Pilger E, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Beschorner U, Noory E, Neumann FJ, Zeller T (2015) Stent placement vs. balloon angioplasty for popliteal artery treatment: two-year results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther 22:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarzwalder U, Zeller T (2010) Debulking procedures: potential device specific indications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 13(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang JL, Patel VI, Conrad MF, Lamuraglia GM, Chung TK, Cambria RP (2008) Common femoral artery occlusive disease: contemporary results following surgical endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 48:872–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kechagias A, Ylonen K, Biancari F (2008) Long-term outcome after isolated endarterectomy of the femoral bifurcation. World J Surg 32:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kram HB, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Wengerter KR, Panetta TF, Nwosisi C (1991) Late results of two hundred seventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments. J Vasc Surg 14:386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iida O, Nakamura M, Yamauchi Y, Kawasaki D, Yokoi Y, Yokoi H, Soga Y, Zen K, Hirano K, Suematsu N, Inoue N, Suzuki K, Shintani Y, Miyashita Y, Urasawa K, Kitano I, Yamaoka T, Murakami T, Uesugi M, Tsuchiya T, Shinke T, Oba Y, Ohura N, Hamasaki T, Nanto S, OLIVE Investigators (2013) Endovascular treatment for infrainguinal vessels in patients with critical limb ischemia: OLIVE registry, a prospective, multicenter study in Japan with 12-month follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. AEH and MN performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AEH, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masashi Nakao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Junichi Yamaguchi and Hisao Otsuki belong to the division (Clinical Research division for Cardiovascular Catheter Intervention) financially maintained by the donation from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic Terumo. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital (No 3502-R).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, A.E., Nakao, M., Katsumata, H. et al. Clinical outcomes after balloon angioplasty with Crosser device for heavily calcified common femoral and popliteal artery disease. Heart Vessels 36, 1359–1365 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01816-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01816-z

Keywords

Navigation