Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of cryo-ablation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the low atrioventricular (AV) block risk during cryo-ablation, it has become possible to treat AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) during arrhythmia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of performing cryo-ablation for AVNRT during arrhythmia. Twenty-three patients with AVNRT treated by cryo-ablation during arrhythmia were enrolled. Cryo-ablation was performed gradually from the bottom to above the paraseptal tricuspid annulus until AVNRT was terminated. If the slow pathway was not eliminated despite cryo-ablation terminating the AVNRT, additional cryo-ablation was performed at a higher site until the slow pathway elimination was achieved. AVNRT was terminated by cryo-ablation in all 23 patients. However, the slow pathway was only eliminated in 6 patients. Among the remaining 17 patients, the slow pathway could not be ablated because transient AV block occurred during cryo-ablation at a higher site in 8 patients; however, cryo-ablation at a higher site successfully eliminated the slow pathway in the other 9 patients. In these 9 patients, the distance from the bottom of tricuspid annulus to the site of slow pathway elimination was significantly longer than that from bottom of tricuspid annulus to the AVNRT termination site (20.1 ± 5.3 vs 14.7 ± 4.5 mm: p = 0.027). During follow-up, AVNRT recurrence was confirmed in 3 patients. In 1 of these 3 patients, even a slow pathway elimination was achieved by cryo-ablation at the AVNRT termination site. The AVNRT termination site may not be the ideal site for performing cryo-ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, Arribas F, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Calkins H, Corrado D, Deftereos SG, Diller GP, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Gorenek B, Grace A, Ho SY, Kaski JC, Kuck KH, Lambiase PD, Sacher F, Sarquella-Brugada G, Suwalski P, Zaza A (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia, The Task Force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): developed in collaboration with the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 41:655–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morady F (2004) Catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias: state of the art. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richard L, Snowdon, Kalman JM (2009) Catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J (eds) Cardiac electrophysiology from cell to bedside, 5th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, p 1083

  4. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI, Jess O, Overholt ED, Lazzara R (1992) Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med 327:313–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, Commenges D, Montserrat P, d’Ivernois C, Lemetayer P, Warin JF (1992) Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation 85:2162–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spector P, Reynolds MR, Calkins H, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A, Williams CJ, Sledge I (2009) Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 104:671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen-Urstad M, Tabrizi F, Kennebäck G, Wredlert C, Klang C, Insulander P (2006) High success rate with cryomapping and cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrytachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29:487–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Sisti A, Tonet J, Gueffaf F, Touil F, Leclercq JF, Aouate P, Lacotte J, Hidden-Lucet F, Frank R (2008) Effects of inadvertent atrioventricular block on clinical outcomes during cryoablation of the slow pathway in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace 10:1421–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez MD, Banchs JE, Rivera J (2011) Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and variants. In: Huan S, Wood M, Miller J (eds) Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, 2nd edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 318–350

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller JM, Rosenthal ME, Gottlieb CD, Vassallo JA, Josephson ME (1991) Usefulness of the delta ha interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias. Am J Cardiol 68:1037–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knight BP, Zivin A, Souza J, Flemming M, Pelosi F, Goyal R, Man C, Strickberger SA, Morady F (1999) A technique for the rapid diagnosis of atrial tachycardia in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:775–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkozy A, Richter S, Chierchia GB, De Asmundis C, Seferlis C, Brugada P, Kaufman L, Buyl R, Dorian P, Mangat I (2008) A novel pacing manoeuvre to diagnose atrial tachycardia. Europace 10:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drago F, Silvetti MS, De Santis A, Grutter G, Andrew P (2006) Lengthier cryoablation and a bonus cryoapplication is associated with improved efficacy for cryothermal catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias in children. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 16:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pieragnoli P, Paoletti Perini A, Checchi L, Carrassa G, Giomi A, Carrai P, Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Ricciardi G (2015) Cryoablation of typical avnrt: younger age and administration of bonus ablation favor long-term success. Heart Rhythm 12:2125–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandilands A, Boreham P, Pitts-Crick J, Cripps T (2008) Impact of cryoablation catheter size on success rates in the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia in 160 patients with long-term follow-up. Europace 10:683–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kay GN, Epstein AE, Dailey SM, Plumb VJ (1992) Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit. Circulation 85:1675–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivard L, Dubuc M, Guerra PG, Novak P, Roy D, Macle L, Thibault B, Talajic M, Khairy P (2008) Cryoablation outcomes for av nodal reentrant tachycardia comparing 4-mm versus 6-mm electrode-tip catheters. Heart Rhythm 5:230–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khairy P, Chauvet P, Lehmann J, Lambert J, Macle L, Tanguay JF, Sirois MG, Santoianni D, Dubuc M (2003) Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 107:2045–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arentz T (2005) Return to the ice age? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:370–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deisenhofer I, Zrenner B, Yin YH, Pitschner HF, Kuniss M, Grossmann G, Stiller S, Luik A, Veltmann C, Frank J, Linner J, Estner HL, Pflaumer A, Wu J, von Bary C, Ucer E, Reents T, Tzeis S, Fichtner S, Kathan S, Karch MR, Jilek C, Ammar S, Kolb C, Liu ZC, Haller B, Schmitt C, Hessling G (2010) Cryoablation versus radiofrequency energy for the ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the cyrano study): results from a large multicenter prospective randomized trial. Circulation 122:2239–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan NY, Mok NS, Lau CL, Lo YK, Choy CC, Lau ST, Choi YC (2009) Treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by cryoablation with a 6 mm-tip catheter vs. radiofrequency ablation. Europace 11:1065–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matta M, Anselmino M, Scaglione M, Vitolo M, Ferraris F, Di Donna P, Caponi D, Castagno D, Gaita F (2017) Cooling dynamics: a new predictor of long-term efficacy of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia cryoablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 48:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Shugo Egashira, Joe Ninomiya, and Kouzaburou Oba for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Miyazaki, Japan

    Tadashi Hoshiyama, Keiichi Ashikaga & Yoshisato Shibata

  2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan

    Tadashi Hoshiyama & Kenichi Tsujita

Authors
  1. Tadashi Hoshiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keiichi Ashikaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenichi Tsujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshisato Shibata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadashi Hoshiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoshiyama, T., Ashikaga, K., Tsujita, K. et al. Efficacy of cryo-ablation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Heart Vessels 36, 541–548 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01717-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01717-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation