Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Internal iliac artery preservation outcomes of endovascular aortic repair for common iliac aneurysm: iliac branch device versus crossover chimney technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the outcomes of using iliac branch devices (IBD) and the crossover chimney (COCh) technique for preserving the internal iliac artery (IIA) during endovascular aortic repair in patients with common iliac aneurysm (CIA).

Methods

From February 2010 to July 2016, we recruited 61 consecutive and elective patients. Thirty of them received the IBD, and the remaining 31 received the COCh. Their medical chart was reviewed retrospectively, and computed tomographic angiography was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and then yearly as a follow-up.

Results

The median follow-up time was 19.72 ± 5.45 months. The technical success rate reached 100% in both groups. The 12-month and 24-month primary IIA patency rates between IBD and COCh group were 90.00% versus 93.54% (p = 0.67) and 83.33% versus 93.54% (p = 0.25). The numbers of stents were 1.00 ± 0.00 and 1.93 ± 0.24 in the IBD and COCh group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for the incidence of type 1a (IBD/COCh = 3.33%/6.45%, p > 0.99) and type 2 endoleak (IBD/COCh = 13.33%/12.90%, p > 0.99) between two groups. Neither type 1b or type 3 endoleak nor delayed aortic rupture appeared in our series. The postoperative complication rates did not exhibit significant differences either. Free from reintervention was also similar in both groups (IBD/COCh = 22.50 ± 4.62/23.00 ± 3.87 months, p = 0.64).

Conclusions

The IBD and COCh techniques exhibited similar success rates and IIA patency rates at the 24-month follow-up. Both these techniques are feasible for the preservation of IIA in patients with CIA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hinchliffe RJ, Alric P, Rose D, Owen V, Davidson IR, Armon MP, Hopkinso BR (2003) Comparison of morphologic features of intact and ruptured aneurysms of infrarenal abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 38(1):88–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Armon MP, Wenham PW, Whitaker SC, Gregson RH, Hopkinson BR (1998) Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15(3):255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henretta JP, Karch LA, Hodgson KJ, Mattos MA, Ramsey DE, McLafferty R, Sumner DS (1999) Special iliac artery considerations during aneurysm endografting. Am J Surg 178(3):212–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bratby MJ, Munneke GM, Belli AM, Loosemore TM, Loftus I, Thompson MM, Morgan RA (2008) How safe is bilateral internal iliac artery embolization prior to EVAR? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31:246–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, De Rango P, Panuccio G, Cao P (2009) Endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysm: concurrent comparison of side branch endograft versus hypogastric exclusion. J Vasc Surg 49(5):1154–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rayt HS, Bown MJ, Lambert KV, Fishwick NG, McCarthy MJ, London NJ, Sayers RD (2008) Buttock claudication and erectile dysfunction after internal iliac artery embolization in patients prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31:728–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Farahmand P, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, Allaire E, Marzelle J, Roudot-Thoraval F (2008) Is hypogastric artery embolization during endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair (EVAR) innocuous and useful? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35(4):429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewster DC, Franklin DP, Cambria RP, Darling RC, Moncure AC, Lamuraglia GM, Stone WM, Abbott WM (1991) Intestinal ischemia complicating abdominal aortic surgery. Surgery 109:447–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wyers MC, Schermerhorn ML, Fillinger MF, Powell RJ, Rzucidlo EM, Walsh DB, Zwolak RM, Cronenwett JL (2002) Internal iliac occlusion without coil embolization during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 36(6):1138–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iliopoulos JI, Howanitz PE, Pierce GE, Kueshkerian SM, Thomas JH, Hermreck AS (1987) The critical hypogastric circulation. Am J Surg 154:671–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Torsello G, Schönefeld E, Osada N, Austermann M, Pennekamp C, Donas KP (2010) Endovascular treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms using the bell-bottom technique: long-term results. J Endovasc Ther 17:504–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobato AC (2011) Sandwich technique for aortoiliac aneurysms extending to the internal iliac artery or isolated common/internal iliac artery aneurysms: a new endovascular approach to preserve pelvic circulation. J Endovasc Ther 18:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lobato AC, Canacho-Lobato L (2013) The sandwich technique to treat complex aortoiliac or isolated iliac aneurysms: results of midterm follow-up. J Vasc Surg 57(2 Suppl):26S–34S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu IH, Chou HW, Chang CH, Lin CF, Chi NH, Wang SS (2015) Crossover chimney technique to preserve the internal iliac artery during endovascular repair of iliac or aortoiliac aneurysms: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 22(3):388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schönhofer S, Mansour R, Ghotbi R (2015) Initial results of the management of aortoiliac aneurysms with gore excluder iliac branched endoprosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg 56:883–888

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrer C, De Crescenzo F, Coscarella C, Cao P (2014) Early experience with the excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis. J Cardiovasc Surg 55:679–683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parlani G, Verzini F, De Rango P, Brambilla D, Coscarella C, Ferrer C, Cao P (2012) Long-term results of iliac aneurysm repair with iliac branched endograft: a 5-year experience on 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43(3):287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pearce BJ, Varu VN, Glocker R, Novak Z, Jordan WD, Lee JT (2015) Anatomic suitability of aortoiliac aneurysms for next generation branched systems. Ann Vasc Surg 29:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DeRubertis BG, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Greenberg JI (2012) Results of a double-barrel technique with commercially available devices for hypogastric preservation during aortoilac endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 56:1252–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haulon S, Greenberg RK, Pfaff K, Francis C, Koussa M, West K (2007) Branched grafting for aortoiliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33(5):567–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dias NV, Resch TA, Sonesson B, Ivancev K, Malina M (2008) EVAR of aortoiliac aneurysms with branched stent-grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35(6):677–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira M, Monteiro M, Lanziotti L (2010) Technical aspects and midterm patency of iliac branched devices. J Vasc Surg 51(3):545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong S, Greenberg RK, Brown CR, Mastracci TM, Bena J, Eafketon MJ (2013) Endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease with the helical iliac bifurcation device and the bifurcated–bifurcated iliac bifurcation device. J Vasc Surg 58(4):861–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bisdas T, Weiss K, Donas KP, Schwindt A, Torsello G, Austermann M (2014) Use of iliac branch devices for endovascular repair of aneurysmal distal seal zones after EVAR. J Endovasc Ther 21(4):579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pratesi G, Fargion A, Pulli R, Barbante M, Dorigo W, Ippoliti A, Pratesi C (2013) Endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms: four-year results of iliac branch endograft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 45(6):607–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fargion AT, Masciello F, Pratesi C, Prastesi G, Torsello G, Donas KP, pELVIS Registry collaborators (2018) Results of the multicenter pELVIS registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device. J Vasc Surg 68(5):1367–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the help from Taiwan Association of Cardiovascular Surgery Research and appreciate Wallace Academic Editing for manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Ming Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, YT., Kuo, TT., Chen, PL. et al. Internal iliac artery preservation outcomes of endovascular aortic repair for common iliac aneurysm: iliac branch device versus crossover chimney technique. Heart Vessels 36, 235–241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01678-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01678-x

Keywords

Navigation