Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography utilizing intraprocedural 320-row computed tomography with minimal contrast medium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently developed coronary angiography with intraprocedural 320-row computed tomography can be performed in a catheterization laboratory (XACT) by injecting contrast medium from a place close to the coronary arteries, thereby requiring a minimal amount of contrast medium. However, its clinical application has not yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of XACT angiography with a minimal volume of contrast medium in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 167 coronary segments were analyzed in 14 patients (9 males, median age 70 years) with suspected CAD by XACT angiography with 7.5 ml of contrast medium and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with standard techniques. The segmental-based diagnostic accuracy of XACT angiography in detecting stenosis of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% and visualized by ICA was good (sensitivity: 74% and 62%, specificity: 99% and 99%, positive predictive value: 93% and 80%, and negative predictive value: 97% and 97%, respectively). These results suggest that XACT angiography with a very low amount of contrast medium may have strong clinical utility for screening coronary arteries in patients with renal dysfunction or undergoing clinical procedures such as pacemaker implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yokoi K, Mizote I, Shiraki T, Ide S, Ohtani T, Hikoso S, Ikari Y, Sakata Y (2019) Mechanism of good back-up support with a deep-seated guiding catheter during percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 83:1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyman U, Bjork J, Aspelin P, Marenzi G (2008) Contrast medium dose-to-GFR ratio: a measure of systemic exposure to predict contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Radiol 49:658–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang K, Li HL, Bei WJ, Guo XS, Chen SQ, Islam SMS, Chen JY, Liu Y, Tan N (2017) Association of left ventricular ejection fraction with contrast-induced nephropathy and mortality following coronary angiography or intervention in patients with heart failure. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:887–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kato E, Fujimoto S, Takamura K, Kawaguchi Y, Aoshima C, Hiki M, Kumamaru KK, Daida H (2018) Clinical significance of transluminal attenuation gradient in 320-row area detector coronary CT angiography. Heart Vessels 33:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harigaya H, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Inoue K, Hara T, Okamura M, Naruse H, Ishii J, Hishida H, Ozaki Y (2010) Prediction of the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention using coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart Vessels 26:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yokoi K, Hara M, Ueda Y, Sumitsuji S, Awata M, Salah YK, Kabata D, Shintani A, Sakata Y (2017) Ideal guiding catheter position during bilaterally engaged percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 119:1518–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tasai I, Lee T, Tsai W, Chen M, Wu M, Lee W, Ting H (2008) Contrast enhancement in cardiac MDCT: comparison of iodixanol 320 versus iohexol 350. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W47–W53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ, Cheng V, DeFrance T, Hellinger JC, Karlsberg RP (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cerci R, Vavere A, Miller J, Yoneyama K, Rochitte C, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Clouse M, Laham R, Bush D, Shapiro E, Lardo A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima J, Arbab-Zadeh A (2013) Patterns of coronary arterial lesion calcification by a novel, cross-sectional CT angiographic assessment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1619–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, Walker S, Fraser C, Jia X, Waugh N (2008) 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94:1386–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Reiber JH, Boersma E, Schalij MJ, Spano F, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Uehara M, Takaoka H, Kobayashi Y, Funabashi N (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed-tomography for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with various heart rates and heart rhythms compared with conventional coronary-angiography. Int J Cardiol 167:809–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Jaffe R, Karkabi B, Flugelman MY, Kogan A, Shapira R, Peled N, Lewis BS (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 115:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M, Hamon M (2006) Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1896–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li S, Ni Q, Wu H, Peng L, Dong R, Chen L, Liu J (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 168:2699–2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai TT, Patel UD, Chang TI, Kennedy KF, Masoudi FA, Matheny ME, Kosiborod M, Amin AP, Messenger JC, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA (2014) Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath-PCI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aurelio A, Durante A (2014) Contrast-induced nephropathy in percutaneous coronary interventions: pathogenesis, risk factors, outcome, prevention and treatment. Cardiology 128:62–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parfrey P (2005) The clinical epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:S3–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rybicki F, Mather R, Kumamaru K, Brinker J, Chen M, Cox C, Matheson M, Dewey M, DiCarli M, Miller J, Geleijns J, George R, Paul N, Texter J, Vavere A, Yaw T, Lima J, Clouse M (2015) Comprehensive assessment of radiation dose estimates for the CORE320 Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W27–W36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Bijl N, de Bruin PW, Geleijns J, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Kroft LJ (2010) Assessment of coronary artery calcium by using volumetric 320-row multi-detector computed tomography: comparison of 0.5 mm with 3.0 mm slice reconstructions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Szilveszter B, Celeng C, Maurovich-Horvat P (2016) Plaque assessment by coronary CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, Schonberg SO, Luchner A, Strohm O, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Hoebel N, Simor T (2013) MR-IMPACT II: magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J 34:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, Takeda K (2003) Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, Dill T, Hombach V, Schulz-Menger J, Nagel E, Lombardi M, van Rossum AC, Wagner A, Schwitter J, Senges J, Sabin GV, Sechtem U, Mahrholdt H (2009) EuroCMR registry: results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1457–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morton G, Plein S, Nagel E (2010) Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Inter Med 152:827–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Yasuhiro Yanagawa for his technical assistance. We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohito Ohtani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There was no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chimura, M., Ohtani, T., Yokoi, K. et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography utilizing intraprocedural 320-row computed tomography with minimal contrast medium. Heart Vessels 35, 1341–1348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01610-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01610-3

Keywords

Navigation