Skip to main content
Log in

Transfemoral extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Needle’s Eye Snare: a single-center experience of more than 900 leads

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The femoral approach with the Needle’s Eye Snare (NES) is often used for bailout after failure of the superior approach for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). The safety and efficacy of the NES as a first-line tool for TLE remain unclear. The medical records of patients who underwent TLE via the femoral approach utilizing the NES from May 2014 to June 2019 in Peking University People’s Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Nine hundred and eighty-five leads were extracted in 492 patients (369 men; mean age 72.8 ± 29.0 years). The median (range) number of leads extracted per patient was 2 (1–6). The mean indwelling time of all extracted leads was 112.6 ± 52.0 months. The complete procedure success rate, clinical success rate, and failure rate were 94.1% (463/492), 97.8% (481/492), and 1.1% (11/492), respectively. Major complications including death occurred in nine patients (1.9%), of whom eight developed cardiac tamponade. Among these eight patients, emergency pericardiocentesis followed by rescue surgical repair if necessary was successful in 6 (75.0%) and failed in 2 (25.0%). No significant differences were found in the clinical success rate or major complications rate between patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or between patients with infected and uninfected leads. A femoral approach with the NES is safe and effective for TLE of both pacing and defibrillator leads and could be considered a first-line approach. Cardiac tamponade was the most frequent cardiovascular complication. A strategy of emergency pericardiocentesis followed by a rescue surgical approach seems to be reasonable technique to treat a cardiac tamponade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klug D, Jarwe M, Messaoudene SA, Kouakam C, Marquie C, Gay A, Lacroix D, Kacet S (2002) Pacemaker lead extraction with the needle's eye snare for countertraction via a femoral approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25(7):1023–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bracke FA, Dekker L, van Gelder BM (2013) The Needle's Eye Snare as a primary tool for pacing lead extraction. Europace 15(7):1007–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha YM, Clancy J, Deharo JC, Ellenbogen KA, Exner D, Hussein AA, Kennergren C, Krahn A, Lee R, Love CJ, Madden RA, Mazzetti HA, Moore JC, Parsonnet J, Patton KK, Rozner MA, Selzman KA, Shoda M, Srivathsan K, Strathmore NF, Swerdlow CD, Tompkins C, Wazni O (2017) 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm 14(12):e503–e551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Chami MF, Merchant FM, Waheed A, Khattak F, El-Khalil J, Patel A, Sayegh MN, Desai Y, Leon AR, Saba S (2017) Predictors and outcomes of lead extraction requiring a bailout femoral approach: data from 2 high-volume centers. Heart Rhythm 14(4):548–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulpuru SK, Hayes DL, Osborn MJ, Asirvatham SJ (2015) Femoral approach to lead extraction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(3):357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Migliore F, Testolina M, Sagone A, Carretta D, Agricola T, Rovaris G, Piazzi E, Facchin D, De Lazzari M, Zorzi A, Melillo F, Cataldi C, Marzi A, Bottio T, Tarzia V, Gerosa G, Iliceto S, Bertaglia E, Mazzone P (2019) Multicenter experience with the evolution RL mechanical sheath for lead extraction using a stepwise approach: safety, effectiveness, and outcome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 42(7):989–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bordachar P, Defaye P, Peyrouse E, Boveda S, Mokrani B, Marquie C, Barandon L, Fossaert EM, Garrigue S, Reuter S, Laborderie J, Marijon E, Deharo JC, Jacon P, Kacet S, Ploux S, Deplagne A, Haissaguerre M, Clementy J, Ritter P, Klug D (2010) Extraction of old pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator leads by laser sheath versus femoral approach. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3(4):319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robboy SJ, Harthorne JW, Leinbach RC, Sanders CA, Austen WG (1969) Autopsy findings with permanent pervenous pacemakers. Circulation 39(4):495–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marijon E, Boveda S, De Guillebon M, Jacob S, Vahdat O, Barandon L, Combes N, Sidobre L, Albenque JP, Clementy J, Bordachar P (2009) Contributions of advanced techniques to the success and safety of transvenous leads extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(Suppl 1):S38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Sellers TD, Turk KT, Reeves R, Young R, Crevey B, Kutalek SP, Freedman R, Friedman R, Trantham J, Watts M, Schutzman J, Oren J, Wilson J, Gold F, Fearnot NE, Van Zandt HJ (1999) Intravascular extraction of problematic or infected permanent pacemaker leads: 1994–1996 U.S. extraction database, MED institute. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 22(9):1348–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Candinas R, Duru F, Schneider J, Luscher TF, Stokes K (1999) Postmortem analysis of encapsulation around long-term ventricular endocardial pacing leads. Mayo Clin Proc 74(2):120–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Novak M, Dvorak P, Kamaryt P, Slana B, Lipoldova J (2009) Autopsy and clinical context in deceased patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators: intracardiac findings near their leads and electrodes. Europace 11(11):1510–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rennert RC, Rustad K, Levi K, Harwood M, Sorkin M, Wong VW, Al-Ahmad A, Zei P, Hsia H, Beygui RE, Norton L, Wang P, Gurtner GC (2014) A histological and mechanical analysis of the cardiac lead-tissue interface: implications for lead extraction. Acta Biomater 10(5):2200–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hauser RG, Katsiyiannis WT, Gornick CC, Almquist AK, Kallinen LM (2010) Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction. Europace 12(3):395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein LM, Love CJ, Wilkoff BL, Chung MK, Hackler JW, Bongiorni MG, Segreti L, Carrillo RG, Baltodano P, Fischer A, Kennergren C, Viklund R, Mittal S, Arshad A, Ellenbogen KA, John RM, Maytin M (2013) Superior vena cava defibrillator coils make transvenous lead extraction more challenging and riskier. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(9):987–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malecka B, Kutarski A, Grabowski M (2010) Is the transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads more hazardous than that of pacemaker leads? Kardiol Pol 68(8):884–890

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes S, Cranney G, Bennett M, Li A, Giles R (2014) Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre. Europace 16(9):1350–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Le KY, Sohail MR, Friedman PA, Uslan DZ, Cha SS, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Baddour LM (2011) Impact of timing of device removal on mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Heart Rhythm 8(11):1678–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaynor SL, Zierer A, Lawton JS, Gleva MJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Moon MR (2006) Laser assistance for extraction of chronically implanted endocardial leads: infectious versus noninfectious indications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29(12):1352–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bongiorni MG, Kennergren C, Butter C, Deharo JC, Kutarski A, Rinaldi CA, Romano SL, Maggioni AP, Andarala M, Auricchio A, Kuck K-H, Blomström-Lundqvist C (2017) The European Lead Extraction Controlled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) registry of transvenous lead extraction outcomes. Eur Heart J 38(40):2995–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Franceschi F, Dubuc M, Deharo JC, Mancini J, Page P, Thibault B, Koutbi L, Prevot S, Khairy P (2011) Extraction of transvenous leads in the operating room versus electrophysiology laboratory: a comparative study. Heart Rhythm 8(7):1001–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuebin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Ze, F., Li, D. et al. Transfemoral extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Needle’s Eye Snare: a single-center experience of more than 900 leads. Heart Vessels 35, 825–834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01539-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01539-2

Keywords

Navigation