Skip to main content
Log in

Significant impact of left ventricular assist device models on the value of flow-mediated dilation: effects of LVAD on endothelial function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The precise physiological changes associated with the use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not well characterized. We examined the impact of changes in hemodynamic state using LVAD on endothelial function. We measured flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) to evaluate endothelial vasodilator function of the brachial artery in 53 patients (dilated cardiomyopathy: 39, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 4, and others: 10) with an implanted LVAD (DuraHeart, EVAHEART, or HeartMate II). We found that FMD value in the HeartMateII LVAD group (9.3% ± 2.9%) was significantly higher than those in the other two groups (EVAHEART: 6.7% ± 2.8% and DuraHeart: 6.2% ± 4.0%). Other factors that affected the FMD value were age (r =  − 0.31, p = 0.026), Brinkman index (r =  − 0.30, p = 0.029); however, aortic opening, aortic regurgitation, and other hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure did not correlate with FMD. Multivariate analyses revealed that the difference among the LVAD models most significantly affected the FMD values after adjusting for age and smoking status (t = 2.6, p = 0.014). Event free survival rate of death and cerebral infarction was not significantly different according to the value of FMD. The difference among the LVAD groups most significantly affected the state of endothelial function and it had more impact than other clinical factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Witman MA, Garten RS, Gifford JR, Groot HJ, Trinity JD, Stehlik J, Nativi JN, Selzman CH, Drakos SG, Richardson RS (2015) Further peripheral vascular dysfunction in heart failure patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: the role of pulsatility. JACC Heart Fail 3(9):703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lou X, Templeton DL, John R, Dengel DR (2012) Effects of continuous flow left ventricular assist device support on microvascular endothelial function. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 5(3):345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz SD, Biasucci L, Sabba C, Strom JA, Jondeau G, Galvao M, Solomon S, Nikolic SD, Forman R, LeJemtel TH (1992) Impaired endothelium-mediated vasodilation in the peripheral vasculature of patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:918–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kubo SH, Rector TS, Bank AJ, Williams RE, Heifetz SM (1991) Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Circulation 84:1589–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Amir O, Radovancevic B, Delgado RM 3rd, Kar B, Radovancevic R, Henderson M, Cohn WE, Smart FW (2006) Peripheral vascular reactivity in patients with pulsatile vs axial flow left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant 25(4):391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takishima I, Nakamura T, Hirano M, Kitta Y, Kobayashi T, Fujioka D, Saito Y, Watanabe K, Watanabe Y, Mishina H, Obata JE, Kawabata K, Tamaru S, Kugiyama K (2012) Predictive value of serial assessment of endothelial function in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 158:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz SD, Hryniewicz K, Hriljac I, Balidemaj K, Dimayuga C, Hudaihed A, Yasskiy A (2005) Vascular endothelial dysfunction and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 111:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer B, Mörtl D, Strecker K, Hülsmann M, Kulemann V, Neunteufl T, Pacher R, Berger R (2005) Flow-mediated vasodilation predicts outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: comparison with B-type natriuretic peptide. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1011–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe S, Amiya E, Watanabe M, Takata M, Ozeki A, Watanabe A, Kawarasaki S, Nakao T, Hosoya Y, Omori K, Maemura K, Komuro I, Nagai R (2013) Simultaneous heart rate variability monitoring enhances the predictive value of flow-mediated dilation in ischemic heart disease. Circ J 77(4):1018–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson HM, Gossett LK, Piper ME, Aeschlimann SE, Korcarz CE, Baker TB, Fiore MC, Stein JH (2010) Effects of smoking and smoking cessation on endothelial function: 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(18):1988–1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diehl P, Aleker M, Helbing T, Sossong V, Beyersdorf F, Olschewski M, Bode C, Moser M (2010) Enhanced microparticles in ventricular assist device patients predict platelet, leukocyte and endothelial cell activation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11(2):133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sansone R, Stanske B, Keymel S, Schuler D, Horn P, Saeed D, Boeken U, Westenfeld R, Lichtenberg A, Kelm M, Heiss C (2015) Macrovascular and microvascular function after implantation of left ventricular assist devices in end-stage heart failure: role of microparticles. J Heart Lung Transplant 34:921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasin T, Matsuzawa Y, Guddeti RR, Aoki T, Kwon TG, Schettle S, Lennon RJ, Chokka RG, Lerman A, Kushwaha SS (2015) Attenuation in peripheral endothelial function after continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy is associated with cardiovascular adverse events. Circ J 79:770–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Zhi H, Yuen PS, Star RA, Banks SM, Schechter AN, Natanson C, Gladwin MT, Solomon SB (2005) Hemolysis-associated endothelial dysfunction mediated by accelerated NO inactivation by decompartmentalized oxyhemoglobin. J Clin Invest 115(12):3409–3417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caruso R, Verde A, Campolo J, Milazzo F, Russo C, Boroni C, Parolini M, Trunfio S, Paino R, Martinelli L, Frigerio M, Parodi O (2012) Severity of oxidative stress and inflammatory activation in end-stage heart failure patients are unaltered after 1 month of left ventricular mechanical assistance. Cytokine 59:138–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang C (2008) The role of inflammatory cytokines in endothelial dysfunction. Basic Res Cardiol 103:398–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Imamura T, Murasawa T, Kawasaki H, Kashiwa K, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, Ono M (2017) Correlation between driveline features and driveline infection in left ventricular assist device selection. J Artif Organs 20(1):34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eisuke Amiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, A., Amiya, E., Hatano, M. et al. Significant impact of left ventricular assist device models on the value of flow-mediated dilation: effects of LVAD on endothelial function. Heart Vessels 35, 207–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01474-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01474-2

Keywords

Navigation