Feasibility and safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization with intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test
- 49 Downloads
Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test is useful to diagnose vasospastic angina. Although outpatient coronary angiography has been widely performed in current clinical settings, the feasibility and safety of ACh provocation test in outpatient services are unclear. A total of 323 patients, who electively underwent ACh provocation test in hospitalization and outpatient services, were included. Coronary angiography was performed after insertion of a temporary pacing electrode in the right ventricle. The positive diagnosis of intracoronary ACh provocation test was defined as total or subtotal coronary artery narrowing accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes. Cardiac complications defined as composite of death, ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac tamponade, were evaluated. There were 201 patients (62%) in the hospitalization group and 122 patients (38%) in the outpatient group. The incidence of positive ACh provocation test was similar between the 2 groups (47 vs. 54%, p = 0.21). Coronary angiography in the outpatient group was performed through the radial artery, mostly (98%) with a 4 F sheath. Venous access site was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and the sheath size was 5 F in all cases. There were 2 cases (1.0%) of cardiac complications in the hospitalization group, whereas 1 case (0.8%), which led to unexpected hospitalization, occurred in the outpatient group. In conclusion, intracoronary ACh provocation test for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina in outpatient services was feasible and safe in selected patients.
KeywordsVasospastic angina Acetylcholine provocation test Outpatient services
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Yasue H, Horio Y, Nakamura N, Fujii H, Imoto N, Sonoda R, Kugiyama K, Obata K, Morikami Y, Kimura T (1986) Induction of coronary artery spasm by acetylcholine in patients with variant angina: possible role of the parasympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of coronary artery spasm. Circulation 74:955–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Heyde GS, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Klees MI, Dijksman LM, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG (2007) Randomized trial comparing same-day discharge with overnight hospital stay after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Elective PCI in Outpatient Study (EPOS). Circulation 115:2299–2306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Chambers CE, Dehmer GJ, Cox DA, Harrington RA, Babb JD, Popma JJ, Turco MA, Weiner BH, Tommaso CL, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (2009) Defining the length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:847–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Saito Y, Kitahara H, Shoji T, Tokimasa S, Nakayama T, Sugimoto K, Fujimoto Y, Kobayashi Y (2016) Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing—omission of the 20-µg dose is feasible in patients without coronary artery spasm in the other coronary artery. Circ J 80:1820–1823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar