Advertisement

Heart and Vessels

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 706–712 | Cite as

Endothelial function estimated by digital reactive hyperemia in patients with atherosclerotic risk factors or coronary artery disease

  • Jeehoon Kang
  • Hack-Lyoung Kim
  • Jae-Bin Seo
  • Jin-Yong Lee
  • Min-Kyong Moon
  • Woo-Young Chung
Original Article

Abstract

Due to the complex profile of atherosclerotic risk factors, an integrated analysis of a specific individual is difficult. Endothelial function reflects a composite of various risk factors, and may be used as an optimal tool to estimate the overall atherosclerotic risk. In this study, we investigated the value of digital Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) in an actual population with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors or coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 417 patients from the Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center RHI registry were enrolled in this study. Patients were enrolled from January, 2013 to July, 2016. RHI was measured using the EndoPAT2000 system (Itamiar Medical Inc. Israel). The mean value of RHI was 1.67 ± 0.48 in total study population. Among various atherosclerotic risk factors, RHI was significantly lower in older (> 60 years) patients, diabetics, smokers’ patients on statin therapy, and those with coronary or cerebrovascular disease. Most of these findings were consistent after adjustment with multiple regression analysis. RHI was significantly associated with CAD, with a hazard ratio of 1.80 (95% confidence interval 1.15–2.80, p = 0.010). In the subgroup with CAD, current smoking was the only finding showing a lower RHI. Brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity, which is a surrogate marker of arterial atherosclerotic change, was not correlated with RHI in patients with clinically significant atherosclerotic disease. RHI was significantly reduced by major atherosclerotic risk factors and in clinical atherosclerotic disease. RHI may reflect a composite effect of risk factors pertaining to the endothelial function.

Keywords

Reactive Hyperemia Index Endothelial dysfunction Coronary artery disease Atherosclerosis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Eagle KA, Ginsburg GS, Musunuru K, Aird WC, Balaban RS, Bennett SK, Blumenthal RS, Coughlin SR, Davidson KW, Frohlich ED, Greenland P, Jarvik GP, Libby P, Pepine CJ, Ruskin JN, Stillman AE, Van Eyk JE, Tolunay HE, McDonald CL, Smith SC Jr (2010) Identifying patients at high risk of a cardiovascular event in the near future: current status and future directions: report of a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group. Circulation 121:1447–1454CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vanhoutte PM (2009) Endothelial dysfunction: the first step toward coronary arteriosclerosis. Circ J 73:595–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toggweiler S, Schoenenberger A, Urbanek N, Erne P (2010) The prevalence of endothelial dysfunction in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 33:746–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawano H, Motoyama T, Hirai N, Kugiyama K, Yasue H, Ogawa H (2002) Endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia is improved by l-arginine administration: possible role of oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis 161:375–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartge MM, Unger T, Kintscher U (2007) The endothelium and vascular inflammation in diabetes. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 4:84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heitzer T, Schlinzig T, Krohn K, Meinertz T, Munzel T (2001) Endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 104:2673–2678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davignon J, Ganz P (2004) Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 109:III27–III32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moerland M, Kales AJ, Schrier L, van Dongen MG, Bradnock D, Burggraaf J (2012) Evaluation of the EndoPAT as a tool to assess endothelial function. Int J Vasc Med 2012:904141PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vogel RA, Corretti MC, Plotnick GD (2000) A comparison of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation using upper and lower arm arterial occlusion in subjects with and without coronary risk factors. Clin Cardiol 23:571–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuvin JT, Patel AR, Sliney KA, Pandian NG, Sheffy J, Schnall RP, Karas RH, Udelson JE (2003) Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude. Am Heart J 146:168–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rubinshtein R, Kuvin JT, Soffler M, Lennon RJ, Lavi S, Nelson RE, Pumper GM, Lerman LO, Lerman A (2010) Assessment of endothelial function by non-invasive peripheral arterial tonometry predicts late cardiovascular adverse events. Eur Heart J 31:1142–1148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamburg NM, Keyes MJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Schnabel R, Pryde MM, Mitchell GF, Sheffy J, Vita JA, Benjamin EJ (2008) Cross-sectional relations of digital vascular function to cardiovascular risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 117:2467–2474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ki YJ, Seo JB, Kim HL, Lim WH, Seo HY, Lee JY, Chung WY (2017) Comparison of endothelial function improvement estimated with Reactive Hyperemia Index between ramipril and telmisartan in hypertensive patients. Clin Hypertens 23:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lerman A, Burnett JC Jr (1992) Intact and altered endothelium in regulation of vasomotion. Circulation 86:III12–III19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutierrez E, Flammer AJ, Lerman LO, Elizaga J, Lerman A, Fernandez-Aviles F (2013) Endothelial dysfunction over the course of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 34:3175–3181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bohm M (2007) Angiotensin receptor blockers versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: where do we stand now? Am J Cardiol 100:38J–44JCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Sudano I, Salvetti A (2002) Effects of antihypertensive drugs on endothelial dysfunction: clinical implications. Drugs 62:265–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Versari D, Daghini E, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Taddei S (2009) Endothelial dysfunction as a target for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 32(Suppl 2):S314–S321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, Holmes DR Jr, Kuvin JT, Lerman A (2004) Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2137–2141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruno RM, Gori T, Ghiadoni L (2014) Endothelial function testing and cardiovascular disease: focus on peripheral arterial tonometry. Vasc Health Risk Manag 10:577–584PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beckman JA, Liao JK, Hurley S, Garrett LA, Chui D, Mitra D, Creager MA (2004) Atorvastatin restores endothelial function in normocholesterolemic smokers independent of changes in low-density lipoprotein. Circ Res 95:217–223CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Messner B, Bernhard D (2014) Smoking and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34:509–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flammer AJ, Anderson T, Celermajer DS, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Ganz P, Hamburg NM, Luscher TF, Shechter M, Taddei S, Vita JA, Lerman A (2012) The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice. Circulation 126:753–767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schoenenberger AW, Urbanek N, Bergner M, Toggweiler S, Resink TJ, Erne P (2012) Associations of Reactive Hyperemia Index and intravascular ultrasound-assessed coronary plaque morphology in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 109:1711–1716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamamoto M, Hara H, Moroi M, Ito S, Nakamura M, Sugi K (2014) Impaired digital reactive hyperemia and the risk of restenosis after primary coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Atheroscler Thromb 21:957–965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    von Mering GO, Arant CB, Wessel TR, McGorray SP, Bairey Merz CN, Sharaf BL, Smith KM, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Sopko G, Handberg E, Pepine CJ, Kerensky RA (2004) Abnormal coronary vasomotion as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular events in women: results from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation 109:722–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seoul National University, Boramae Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Seoul National University, College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations