Skip to main content

Evaluation of repolarization dynamics using the QT–RR regression line slope and intercept relationship during 24-h Holter ECG

Abstract

QT–RR linear regression consists of two parameters, slope and intercept, and the aim of this study was to evaluate repolarization dynamics using the QT–RR linear regression slope and intercept relationship during 24-h Holter ECG. This study included 466 healthy subjects (54.6 ± 14.6 years; 200 men and 266 women) and 17 patients with ventricular arrhythmias, consisted of 10 patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and 7 patients with torsades de pointes (TDP). QT and RR intervals were measured from ECG waves based on a 15-s averaged ECG during 24-h Holter recording using an automatic QT analyzing system. The QT interval dependence on the RR interval was analyzed using a linear regression line for each subject ([QT] = A[RR] + B; where A is the slope and B is the y-intercept). The slope of the QT–RR regression line in healthy subjects was significantly greater in women than in men (0.185 ± 0.036 vs. 0.161 ± 0.033, p < 0.001) and the intercept was significantly smaller in women than in men (0.229 ± 0.028 vs. 0.240 ± 0.027, p < 0.001). A scatter diagram of the QT–RR regression line slope and intercept among healthy subjects demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation (B = −0.62A + 0.34, r = −0.79). Distribution of both scatter diagrams of the slope and the intercept of the QT–RR regression line in patients with IVF and TDP was different from healthy subjects (left corner for IVF and upward shift for TDP). The slope and intercept relationship of the QT–RR linear regression line based on 24-h Holter ECG may become a simple useful marker for abnormality of ventricular repolarization dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Merri M, Moss AJ, Benhorin J, Locati EH, Alberti M, Badilini F (1992) Relation between ventricular repolarization duration and cardiac cycle length during 24-Holter recordings: findings in normal patients and with long QT syndrome. Circulation 85:1816–1821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iacoviello M, Forleo C, Guida P, Romito R, Sorgente A, Sorrentino S, Catucci S, Mastropasqua F, Pitzalis M (2007) Ventricular repolarization dynamicity provides independent prognostic information toward major arrhythmic events in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Indik JH, Pearson EC, Fried K, Woosley RL (2006) Bazett and Fridericia QT correction formulas interfere with measurement of drug-induced changes in QT interval. Heart Rhythm 3:1003–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Viskin S (2009) The QT interval: too long, too short or just right. Heart Rhythm 6:711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smetana P, Pueyo E, Hnatkova K, Batchvarov V, Laguna P, Malik M (2004) Individual patterns of dynamic QT/RR relationship in survivors of acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:1147–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe E, Arakawa T, Uchiyama T, Tong M, Yasui K, Takeuchi H, Terasawa T, Kodama I, Hishida H (2007) Prognostic significance of circadian variability of RR and QT intervals and QT dynamicity in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Rhythm 4:999–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cygankiewicz I, Zareba W, Vazquez R, Almendral J, Bayes-Genis A, Fiol M, Valdes M, Macaya C, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Cinca J, Bayes de Luna A, MUSIC Investigators (2008) Prognostic value of QT/RR slope in predicting mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 19:1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malik M, Färbom P, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, Camm AJ (2002) Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval. Heart 87:220–228

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujiki A, Sakabe M (2011) Comparison of QT/RR relation based on a 15-s averaged ECG and a single beat ECG during atrial fibrillation. Circ J 75:274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Emori T, Ohe T, Aihara N, Shimizu W, Kamakura S, Shimomura K (1995) Dynamic relationship between the QaT interval and heart rate in patients with long QT syndrome during 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 18:1909–1918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suto F, Zhu W, Chan A, Gross GJ (2007) IKr and IKs remodeling differentially affects QT interval prolongation and dynamic adaptation to heart rate acceleration in bradycardic rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292:H1782–H1788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakashima K, Kusakawa I, Yamamoto T, Hirabayashi S, Hosoya R, Shimizu W, Sumitomo N (2013) A left ventricular noncompaction in a patient with long QT syndrome caused by a KCNQ1 mutation: a case report. Heart Vessels 28:126–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bando S, Soeki T, Matsuura T, Niki T, Ise T, Yamaguchi K, Taketani Y, Iwase T, Yamada H, Wakatsuki T, Akaike M, Aiba T, Shimizu W, Sata M (2013) Congenital long QT syndrome with compound mutations in the KCNH2 gene. Heart Vessels. doi:10.1007/800380-013-0406-2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takenaka K, Ai T, Shimizu W, Ninomiya T, Otani H, Kubota T, Takaki H, Kamakura S, Horie M (2003) Exercise stress test amplifies genotype-phenotype correlation in the LQT1 and LQT2 forms of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation 107:838–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX (2010) J wave syndromes. Heart Rhythm 7:549–558

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujiki A, Usui M, Nagasawa H, Mizumaki K, Hayashi H, Inoue H (1999) ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads induced with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs: insight into the mechanism of Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 10:214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujiki A, Sugao M, Nishida K, Sakabe M, Tsuneda T, Mizumaki K, Inoue H (2004) Repolarization abnormality in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: assessment using 24-hour QT–RR and QaT–RR relationships. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugao M, Fujiki A, Sakabe M, Nishida K, Tsuneda T, Iwamoto J, Mizumaki K, Inoue H (2006) New quantitative methods for evaluation of dynamic changes in QT interval on 24 hour Holter ECG recordings: QT interval in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and long QT syndrome. Heart 92:201–207

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Topilski I, Rogowski O, Rosso R, Justo D, Copperman Y, Glikson M, Belhassen B, Hochenberg M, Viskin S (2007) The morphology of the QT interval predicts torsade de pointes during acquired bradyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Ms. Kumiko Kobayashi.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Fujiki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujiki, A., Yoshioka, R. & Sakabe, M. Evaluation of repolarization dynamics using the QT–RR regression line slope and intercept relationship during 24-h Holter ECG. Heart Vessels 30, 235–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0471-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0471-1

Keywords

  • Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
  • Long QT syndrome
  • QT interval
  • QT–RR relation
  • Torsades de pointes