Abstract
Forecasting uncertainties among meteorological fields have long been recognized as the main limitation on the accuracy and predictability of air quality forecasts. However, the particular impact of meteorological forecasting uncertainties on air quality forecasts specific to different seasons is still not well known. In this study, a series of forecasts with different forecast lead times for January, April, July, and October of 2018 are conducted over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region and the impacts of meteorological forecasting uncertainties on surface PM2.5 concentration forecasts with each lead time are investigated. With increased lead time, the forecasted PM2.5 concentrations significantly change and demonstrate obvious seasonal variations. In general, the forecasting uncertainties in monthly mean surface PM2.5 concentrations in the BTH region due to lead time are the largest (80%) in spring, followed by autumn (~50%), summer (~40%), and winter (20%). In winter, the forecasting uncertainties in total surface PM2.5 mass due to lead time are mainly due to the uncertainties in PBL heights and hence the PBL mixing of anthropogenic primary particles. In spring, the forecasting uncertainties are mainly from the impacts of lead time on lower-tropospheric northwesterly winds, thereby further enhancing the condensation production of anthropogenic secondary particles by the long-range transport of natural dust. In summer, the forecasting uncertainties result mainly from the decrease in dry and wet deposition rates, which are associated with the reduction of near-surface wind speed and precipitation rate. In autumn, the forecasting uncertainties arise mainly from the change in the transport of remote natural dust and anthropogenic particles, which is associated with changes in the large-scale circulation.
摘 要
气象要素预报的不确定性是长期以来学界公认的制约空气质量预报准确性和可预测性的主要因素。但目前气象预报的不确定性对不同季节空气质量预报影响的研究较为缺乏,且空气质量预报不确定性随预报时长延长增加的关键过程和机制也尚不明确。本研究通过对京津冀地区2018年1月、4月、7月和10月的2天至7天预报时长的数值预报实验,分析了气象预报不确定性对各预报时长近地面PM2.5浓度预报的影响。结果显示,随预报时长延长,PM2.5 的预报浓度有明显变化,并表现出显著的季节性变化特征:预报时长导致的京津冀地区PM2.5 月平均近地面浓度的预报不确定性在春季最大(80%),其次是秋季(约 50%)、夏季(约 40%)和冬季(20%)。通过分析PM2.5各化学组份近地面浓度和气象要素随预报时长的变化特征,本研究发现冬季预报时长导致的PM2.5近地面浓度预报不确定性主要是由于边界层高度预报随预报时长的升高增强了人为一次颗粒物的边界层混合。在春季,预报时长导致的不确定性则主要受对流层底西北风的影响。随预报时长不断增强的西北风加强了自然源沙尘气溶胶的远距离传输和人为二次气溶胶的凝结生成。在夏季,预报时长导致的不确定性主要是由于近地面风速和降水率随预报时长的减弱导致的干、湿沉积率的减弱。在秋季,预报时长导致的不确定性主要来自自然源沙尘的远距离传输和人为大气颗粒物传输随预报时长的增强,这与大尺度环流随预报时长的变化有关。
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability. The release version of WRF-Chem can be downloaded from http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download/get_source.html. The updated USTC version of WRF-Chem can be downloaded from http://aemol.ustc.edu.cn/product/list/ or contact chunzhao@ustc.edu.cn. Additionally, code modifications will be incorporated into the release version of WRF-Chem in the future.
References
Agarwal, S., and Coauthors, 2020: Air quality forecasting using artificial neural networks with real time dynamic error correction in highly polluted regions. Science of the Total Environment, 745, 139454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139454.
Bao, Y. S., and Coauthors, 2019: Assessing the impact of Chinese FY-3/MERSI AOD data assimilation on air quality forecasts: Sand dust events in northeast China. Atmos. Environ., 205, 78–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.026.
Barnard, J. C., J. D. Fast, G. Paredes-Miranda, W. P. Arnott, and A. Laskin, 2010: Technical note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem “aerosol chemical to aerosol optical properties” module using data from the MILAGRO campaign. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 7325–7340, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7325-2010.
Baumgart, M., P. Ghinassi, V. Wirth, T. Selz, G. C. Craig, and M. Riemer, 2019: Quantitative view on the processes governing the upscale error growth up to the planetary scale using a stochastic convection scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 177, 1713–1731, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0292.1.
Bei, N. F., G. H. Li, Z. Y. Meng, Y. H. Weng, M. Zavala, and L. T. Molina, 2014: Impacts of using an ensemble Kalman filter on air quality simulations along the California-Mexico border region during Cal-Mex 2010 Field Campaign. Science of the Total Environment, 199, 141–153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.121.
Binkowski, F. S., and U. Shankar, 1995: The regional particulate matter model: 1. Model description and preliminary results. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26191–26209, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02093.
Chae, S., J. Shin, S. Kwon, S. Lee, S. Kang, and D. Lee, 2021: PM10 and PM2.5 real-time prediction models using an interpolated convolutional neural network. Scientific Reports, 11, 11952, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91253-9.
Chapman, E. G., W. I. Gustafson Jr., R. C. Easter, J. C. Barnard, S. J. Ghan, M. S. Pekour, and J. D. Fast, 2009: Coupling aerosol-cloud-radiative processes in the WRF-Chem model: Investigating the radiative impact of elevated point sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 945–964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-945-2009.
Chatani, S., and S. Sharma, 2018: Uncertainties caused by major meteorological analysis data sets in simulating air quality over India. J. Geophys. Res., 123, 6230–6247, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027502.
Chen, J., and G. Hoek, 2020: Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International, 143, 109744, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974.
Chen, J. L., J. Y. Huang, X. C. Huang, S. W. Sun, Y. Hao, and H. T. Wu, 2020: How does new environmental law affect public environmental protection activities in China? Evidence from structural equation model analysis on legal cognition. Science of the Total Environment, 714, 136558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136558.
Chen, Z. Y., D. L. Chen, M.-P. Kwan, B. Chen, B. B. Gao, Y. Zhuang, R. Y. Li, and B. Xu, 2019: The control of anthropogenic emissions contributed to 80% of the decrease in PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing from 2013 to 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 13519–13533, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13519-2019.
Dalcher, A., and E. Kalnay, 1987: Error growth and predictability in operational ECMWF forecasts. Tellus A, 39A, 474–491, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1987.tb00322.x.
de Wildt, M. D. R., H. Eskes, A. Manders, F. Sauter, M. Schaap, D. Swart, and P. van Velthoven, 2011: Six-day PM10 air quality forecasts for the Netherlands with the chemistry transport model Lotos-Euros. Atmos. Environ., 15, 5586–5594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.049.
Delle Monache, L., J. P. Hacker, Y. M. Zhou, X. X. Deng, and R. B. Stull, 2006: Probabilistic aspects of meteorological and ozone regional ensemble forecasts. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006917.
Dennis, R., and Coauthors, 2010: A framework for evaluating regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 10, 471–489, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2.
Dentener, F., and Coauthors, 2006: Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 4321–4344, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006.
Du, Q. Y., and Coauthors, 2020: Modeling diurnal variation of surface PM2.5 concentrations over East China with WRF-Chem: Impacts from boundary-layer mixing and anthropogenic emission. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 2839–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2839-2020.
Easter, R. C., and Coauthors, 2004: MIRAGE: Model description and evaluation of aerosols and trace gases. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D20210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004571.
Emanuel, K., and F. Q. Zhang, 2016: On the predictability and error sources of tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 3739–3747, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0100.1.
Emili, E., S. Gürol, and D. Cariolle, 2016: Accounting for model error in air quality forecasts: An application of 4DEnVar to the assimilation of atmospheric composition using QG-Chem 1.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 3933–3959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3933-2016.
Fang, D. L., B. Chen, K. Hubacek, R. J. Ni, L. L. Chen, K. S. Feng, and J. T. Lin, 2019: Clean air for some: Unintended spillover effects of regional air pollution policies. Science Advances, 5, eaav4707, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav4707.
Fast, J. D., W. I. Gustafson Jr., R. C. Easter, R. A. Zaveri, J. C. Barnard, E. G. Chapman, G. A. Grell, and S. E. Peckham, 2006: Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D21305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006721.
Garcia-Menendez, F., Y. T. Hu, and M. T. Odman, 2013: Simulating smoke transport from wildland fires with a regional-scale air quality model: Sensitivity to uncertain wind fields. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 6493–6504, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50524.
Gilliam, R. C., C. Hogrefe, J. M. Godowitch, S. Napelenok, R. Mathur, and S. T. Rao, 2015: Impact of inherent meteorology uncertainty on air quality model predictions. J. Geophys. Res., 200, 12259–12280, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023674.
Ginoux, P., M. Chin, I. Tegen, J. M. Prospero, B. Holben, O. Dubovik, and S. J. Lin, 2001: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20255–20273, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000053.
Gupta, P., and S. A. Christopher, 2009: Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: Multiple regression approach. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011496.
Gustafson, W. I. Jr., E. G. Chapman, S. J. Ghan, R. C. Easter, and J. D. Fast, 2007: Impact on modeled cloud characteristics due to simplified treatment of uniform cloud condensation nuclei during NEAQS 2004. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, L19809, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030021.
Gvoždíková, B., and M. Müller, 2021: Predictability of moisture flux anomalies indicating central European extreme precipitation events. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 3335–3348, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4131.
Ho, H. C., M. S. Wong, L. Yang, W. Z. Shi, J. X. Yang, M. Bilal, and T.-C. Chan, 2018: Spatiotemporal influence of temperature, air quality, and urban environment on cause-specific mortality during hazy days. Environment International, 112, 10–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.001.
Hochman, A., T. Plotnik, F. Marra, E.-R. Shehter, S. Raveh-Rubin, and L. Magaritz-Ronen, 2023: The sources of extreme precipitation predictability; the case of the ‘Wet’ Red Sea Trough. Weather and Climate Extremes, 40, 100564, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WACE.2023.100564.
Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.
Honoré, C., and Coauthors, 2008: Predictability of European air quality: Assessment of 3 years of operational forecasts and analyses by the PREV’AIR system. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008761.
Hu, X.-M., M. Xue, F. Y. Kong, and H. L. Zhang, 2019a: Meteorological conditions during an ozone episode in Dallas-fort worth, Texas, and impact of their modeling uncertainties on air quality prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 124, 1941–1961, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029791.
Hu, Z. Y., and Coauthors, 2019b: Modeling the contributions of Northern Hemisphere dust sources to dust outflow from East Asia. Atmos. Environ., 202, 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.022.
Iacono, M. J., E. J. Mlawer, S. A. Clough, and J.-J. Morcrette, 2000: Impact of an improved longwave radiation model, RRTM, on the energy budget and thermodynamic properties of the NCAR community climate model, CCM3. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14873–14890, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900091.
Janssens-Maenhout, G., and Coauthors, 2015: HTAP_v2.2: A mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 11411–11432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015.
Ji, D. S., and Coauthors, 2019: Impact of air pollution control measures and regional transport on carbonaceous aerosols in fine particulate matter in urban Beijing, China: Insights gained from long-term measurement. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19, 8569–8590, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8569-2019.
Jia, H. L., X. Y. Ma, F. Q. Yu, and J. Quaas, 2021: Significant underestimation of radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions derived from satellite-based methods. Nature Communications, 12, 3649, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23888-1.
Judt, F., 2018: Insights into atmospheric predictability through global convection-permitting model simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1477–1497, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0343.1.
Kanaya, Y., and Coauthors, 2020: Rapid reduction in black carbon emissions from China: Evidence from 2009–2019 observations on Fukue Island, Japan. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 40, 339–63566, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6339-2020.
Keil, C., L. Chabert, O. Nuissier, and L. Raynaud, 2020: Dependence of predictability of precipitation in the northwestern Mediterranean coastal region on the strength of synoptic control. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 15851–15865, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15851-2020.
Khan, A. W., and P. Kumar, 2019: Impact of chemical initial and lateral boundary conditions on air quality prediction. Advances in Space Research, 64, 1331–1342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.06.028.
Kok, J. F., 2011: A scaling theory for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols suggests climate models underestimate the size of the global dust cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1016–1021, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014798108.
Kumar, R., and Coauthors, 2020: Enhancing accuracy of air quality and temperature forecasts during paddy crop residue burning season in Delhi via chemical data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 125, e20200D033019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033019.
Lee, H. J., Y. Liu, B. A. Coull, J. Schwartz, and P. Koutrakis, 2011: A novel calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM2.5 concentraiions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 7991–8002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7991-2011.
Li, M., and Coauthors, 2017a: Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: A review. National Science Review, 4, 834–866, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx150.
Li, M., and Coauthors, 2017b: MIX: A mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 935–963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17935-2017.
Liu, T., A. K. H. Lau, K. Sandbrink, and J. C. H. Fung, 2018: Time series forecasting of air quality based on regional numerical modeling in Hong Kong. J. Geophys. Res., 123, 4175–4196, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028052.
Liu, Y., J. A. Sarnat, V. Kilaru, D. J. Jacob, and P. Koutrakis, 2005: Estimating ground-level PM25 in the eastern United States using satellite remote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 3269–3278, https://doi.org/10.1021/es049352m.
Liu, Y. M., and T. Wang, 2020: Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017-Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 6305–6321, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020.
Magnusson, L., 2017: Diagnostic methods for understanding the origin of forecast errors. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2129–2142, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3072.
Menut, L., G. Rea, S. Mailler, D. Khvorostyanov and S. Turquety, 2015: Aerosol forecast over the Mediterranean area during July 2013 (ADRIMED/CHARMEX). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 7897–7911, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7897-2015.
McNider, R. T., and A. Pour-Biazar, 2020: Meteorological modeling relevant to mesoscale and regional air quality applications: A review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 70, 2–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1694602.
Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237.
Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one-and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1.
Neal, L. S., P. Agnew, S. Moseley, C. Ordóñez, N. H. Savage, and M. Tilbee, 2014: Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast. Atmos. Environ., 98, 385–393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.004.
Ni, Z.-Z., and Coauthors, 2018: Assessment of winter air pollution episodes using long-range transport modeling in Hangzhou, China, during World Internet Conference, 2015. Environmental Pollution, 236, 550–561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.069.
Parsons, D. B., S. P. Lillo, C. P. Rattray, P. Bechtold, M. J. Rodwell, and C. M. Bruce, 2019: The role of continental mesoscale convective systems in forecast busts within global weather prediction systems. Atmosphere, 10, 681, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110681.
Peters, K., and R. Eiden, 1992: Modelling the dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles to a spruce forest. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 26, 2555–2564, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90108-W.
Petersen, A. K., and Coauthors, 2019: Ensemble forecasts of air quality in eastern China—Part 2: Evaluation of the MarcoPolo-Panda prediction system, version 1. Geoscientific Model Development, 12, 1241–1266, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013.
Podrascanin, Z., 2019: Setting-up a real-time air quality forecasting system for Serbia: A WRF-Chem feasibility study with different horizontal resolutions and emission inventories. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 17066–17079, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05140-y.
Qu, L. L., S. J. Liu, L. L. Ma, Z. Z. Zhang, J. H. Du, Y. H. Zhou, and F. Meng, 2020: Evaluating the meteorological normalized PM2.5 trend (2014–2019) in the “2+26” region of China using an ensemble learning technique. Environmental Pollution, 266, 115346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115346.
Rao, S. T., H. Y. Luo, M. Astitha, C. Hogrefe, V. Garcia, and R. Mathur, 2020: On the limit to the accuracy of regional-scale air quality models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 1627–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1627-2020.
Sarangi, C., V. P. Kanawade, S. N. Tripathi, A. Thomas, and D. Ganguly, 2018: Aerosol- induced intensification of cooling effect of clouds during Indian summer monsoon. Nature Communications, 9, 3754, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06015-5.
Seaman, N. L., D. R. Stauffer and A. M. Lario-Gibbs, 1995: A Multiscale Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation System Applied in the San Joaquin Valley during SARMAP. Part I: Modeling Design and Basic Performance Characteristics. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 34, 1739–1761, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1739:AMFDDA>2.0.CO;2.
Selz, T., 2019: Estimating the intrinsic limit of predictability using a stochastic convection scheme. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 757–765, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0373.1.
Seng, D. W., Q. Y. Zhang, X. F. Zhang, G. S. Chen, and X. Y. Chen, 2021: Spatiotemporal prediction of air quality based on LSTM neural network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60, 2021–2032, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.009.
Spiridonov, V., B. Jakimovski, I. Spiridonova, and G. Pereira, 2019: Development of air quality forecasting system in Macedonia, based on WRF-Chem model. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12, 825–836, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00698-5.
Spiridonov, V., N. Ancev, B. Jakimovski, and G. Velinov, 2021: Improvement of chemical initialization in the air quality forecast system in North Macedonia, based on WRF-Chem model. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 14, 283–290, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00933-4.
Stauffer, D. R. and N. L. Seaman, 1990: Use of 4-Dimensional Data Assimilation in a Limited-Area Mesoscale Model. 1. Experiments with Synoptic-Scale Data. Monthly Weather Review, 118, 1250–1277, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1250:UOFDDA>2.0.CO;2.
Tang, R., X. Huang, D. R. Zhou, and A. J. Ding, 2020: Biomass-burning-induced surface darkening and its impact on regional meteorology in eastern China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20, 6177–6191, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6177-2020.
Thomas, A., A. K. Huff, X.-M. Hu, and F. Q. Zhang, 2019: Quantifying uncertainties of ground-level ozone within WRF-Chem simulations in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States as a response to variability. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 1100–1116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001457.
Ulpiani, G., P. N. Duhirwe, G. Y. Yun, and M. J. Lipson, 2022: Meteorological influence on forecasting urban pollutants: Long-term predictability versus extreme events in a spatially heterogeneous urban ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 814, 152537, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.152537.
Wesely, M. L., and B. B. Hicks, 1977: Some factors that affect the deposition rates of sulfur dioxide and similar gases on vegetation. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 27, 1110–1116, https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1977.10470534.
Wiedinmyer, C., S. K. Akagi, R. J. Yokelson, L. K. Emmons, J. A. Al-Saadi, J. J. Orlando, and A. J. Soja, 2011: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): A high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geoscientific Model Development, 4, 625–641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011.
Willmott, C. J., S. G. Ackleson, R. E. Davis, J. J. Feddema, K. M. Klink, D. R. Legates, J. O’Donnell, and C. M. Rowe, 1985: Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 8995–9005, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC090iC05p08995.
WRAP (Western Regional Air Partnership), 2005: 2002 fire emission inventory for the WRAP region-phase II, project No. 178-6. Available from http://www.wrapair.org/forums/fejf/tasks/FEJFtask7PhaseII.html.
Xiao, F., M. Yang, H. Fan, G. H. Fan, and M. A. A. Al-Qaness, 2020: An improved deep learning model for predicting daily PM2.5 concentration. Scientific Reports, 10, 20988, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77757-w.
Yang, Y., Z. L. Ruan, X. J. Wang, Y. Yang, T. G. Mason, H. L. Lin, and L. W. Tian, 2019: Short-term and long-term exposures to fine particulate matter constituents and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution, 247, 874–882, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.060.
Yue, X. C., and Coauthors, 2021: Mitigation of indoor air pollution: A review of recent advances in adsorption materials and catalytic oxidation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 405, 124138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124138.
Zaveri, R. A., and L. K. Peters, 1999: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 30387–30415, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876.
Zaveri, R. A., R. C. Easter, J. D. Fast, and L. K. Peters, 2008: Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC). J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782.
Zhang, B., Y. Wang, and J. Hao, 2015: Simulating aerosol-radiation-cloud feedbacks on meteorology and air quality over eastern China under severe haze conditions in winter. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 2387–2404, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2387-2015.
Zhang, F. Q., N. F. Bei, J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, G. H. Li, R. Y. Zhang, A. Stuart, and A. Aksoy, 2007: Impacts of meteorological uncertainties on ozone pollution predictability estimated through meteorological and photochemical ensemble forecasts. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D04304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007429.
Zhang, F. Q., Y. Q. Sun, L. Magnusson, R. Buizza, S.-J. Lin, J.-H. Chen, and K. Emanuel, 2019: What is the predictability limit of midlatitude weather. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1077–1091, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0269.1.
Zhang, M. S., and Coauthors, 2021: Modeling sensitivities of BVOCs to different versions of MEGAN emission schemes in WRF-Chem (v3.6) and its impacts over eastern China. Geoscientific Model Development, 14, 6155–6175, https://doi.org/10.5194/GMD-14-6155-2021.
Zhang, Z. Y., D. Y. Gong, R. Mao, S.-J. Kim, J. Xu, X. J. Zhao, and Z. Q. Ma, 2017: Cause and predictability for the severe haze pollution in downtown Beijing in November-December 2015. Science of the Total Environment, 592, 627–638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.009.
Zhao, C., X. Liu, L. R. Leung, and S. Hagos, 2011: Radiative impact of mineral dust on monsoon precipitation variability over West Africa. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 1879–1893, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1879-2011.
Zhao, C., S. Chen, L. R. Leung, Y. Qian, J. F. Kok, R. A. Zaveri, and J. Huang, 2013a: Uncertainty in modeling dust mass balance and radiative forcing from size parameterization. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 10733–10753, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10733-2013.
Zhao, C., L. R. Leung, R. Easter, J. Hand, and J. Avise, 2013b: Characterization of speciated aerosol direct radiative forcing over California. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2372–2388, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018364.
Zhao, C., and Coauthors, 2014: Simulating black carbon and dust and their radiative forcing in seasonal snow: A case study over North China with field campaign measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 11475–11491, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11475-2014.
Zhao, C., and Coauthors, 2016: Sensitivity of biogenic volatile organic compounds to land surface parameterizations and vegetation distributions in California. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 1959–1976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1959-2016.
Zhao, Y. H., and Coauthors, 2019: Influences of planetary boundary layer mixing parameterization on summertime surface ozone concentration and dry deposition over North China. Atmos. Environ., 218, 116950, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116950.
Zheng, B., and Coauthors, 2018: Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 14095–14111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFC3700701), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775146, 42061134009), USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (YD2080002007), and Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB41000000). The study used computing resources from the High-Performance Computing Center of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contributions. Qiuyan DU and Chun ZHAO designed the experiments and conducted and analyzed the simulations. All authors contributed to the discussion and final version of the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• Forecasting uncertainties of PM2.5 due to lead time are large.
• Forecasting uncertainties of PM2.5 are largest (smallest) in spring (winter).
• Improving the forecast accuracy of key meteorological fields requires additional effort.
Electronic Supplementary Material
376_2023_3060_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Seasonal Characteristics of Forecasting Uncertainties in Surface PM2.5 Concentration Associated with Forecast Lead Time over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, Q., Zhao, C., Feng, J. et al. Seasonal Characteristics of Forecasting Uncertainties in Surface PM2.5 Concentration Associated with Forecast Lead Time over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 41, 801–816 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3060-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3060-3