Abstract
Initial condition and model errors both contribute to the loss of atmospheric predictability. However, it remains debatable which type of error has the larger impact on the prediction lead time of specific states. In this study, we perform a theoretical study to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local prediction lead time of given states in the Lorenz model. Using the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent method, the prediction lead time, also called local backward predictability limit (LBPL), of given states induced by the two types of errors can be quantitatively estimated. Results show that the structure of the Lorenz attractor leads to a layered distribution of LBPLs of states. On an individual circular orbit, the LBPLs are roughly the same, whereas they are different on different orbits. The spatial distributions of LBPLs show that the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability depend on the locations of given states on the dynamical trajectory and the error magnitudes. When the error magnitude is fixed, the differences between the LBPLs vary with the locations of given states. The larger differences are mainly located on the inner trajectories of regimes. When the error magnitudes are different, the dissimilarities in LBPLs are diverse for the same given state.
摘要
初始状态误差和参数误差对于大气可预报性的丧失具有重要的影响. 哪一类误差对于特定状态可预报性具有更大的影响依然存在着争议. 在本工作中, 我们选择Lorenz模型, 评估了两类误差对于给定状态可预报性的相对影响. 模型中存在初始状态误差 (模式误差)时, 利用向后非线性局部Lyapunov指数 (BNLLE) 方法, 给定状态的理论最长提前预报时间, 即向后可预报性, 可以被定量确定. 研究结果显示, Lorenz吸引子特定结构导致了给定状态的向后可预报性呈现层状分布. 即, 在单个环形轨圈上, 给定状态的向后可预报期限基本一致, 在不同的环形轨圈上, 向后可预报期限则不同. 向后可预报性期限的空间分布显示, 初始状态误差和模式误差对于局部向后可预报性的相对影响取决于给定状态所在的空间位置以及误差量级大小. 当误差量级大小固定时, 两类误差导致的向后可预报期限差值随着给定状态空间位置的变化而变化. 较大差值主要分布在冷暖位相的内圈. 当误差量级不同时, 对于相同的给定状态, 两类误差导致的向后可预报期限差值也是不同的.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berner, J., G. J. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, and T. N. Palmer, 2009: A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. J. Atmos. Sci., 66(3), 603–626, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2677.1.
Charney, J. G., 1966: The feasibility of a global observation and analysis experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 47, 200–221, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-47.3.200.
Chou, J. F., 2011: Predictability of weather and climate. Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology, 1(2), 11–14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Daza, A., A. Wagemakers, B. Georgeot, D. Guéry-Odelin, and M. A. F. Sanjuán, 2016: Basin entropy: A new tool to analyze uncertainty in dynamical systems. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 31416, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31416.
Ding, R. Q., and J. P. Li, 2007: Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Physics Letters A, 364, 396–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.094.
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, and H. Kyung-Ja, 2008: Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and quantification of local predictability. Chinese Physics Letters, 25, 1919–1922, https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/109.
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, and K. H. Seo, 2010: Predictability of the Madden-Julian oscillation estimated using observational data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1004–1013, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3082.1.
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, F. Zheng, J. Feng, and D. Q. Liu, 2015: Estimating the limit of decadal-scale climate predictability using observational data. Climate Dyn., 46, 1563–1580, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2662-6.
Downton, R. A., and R. S. Bell, 1988: The impact of analysis differences on a medium range forecast. Meteor. Mag., 117, 279–284.
Duan, W. S., and M. Mu, 2009: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation: Applications to stability, sensitivity, and predictability. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 52, 883–906, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0090-3.
Duan, W. S., M. Mu, and B. Wang, 2004: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations as the optimal precursors for El Nino-Southern Oscillation events. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004756.
Evans, E., N. Bhatti, J. Kinney, L. Pann, M. Peña, S. C. Yang, E. Kalnay, and J. Hansen, 2004: RISE undergraduates find that regime changes in Lorenz’s model are predictable. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 520–524, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-4-520.
Farrell, B. F., 1990: Small error dynamics and the predictability of atmospheric flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2409–2416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2409:SED-ATP>2.0.CO;2.
Feng, J., R. Q. Ding, D. Q. Liu, and J. P. Li, 2014: The application of nonlinear local Lyapunov vectors to ensemble predictions in Lorenz systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3554–3567, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0270.1.
Gilson, M. K., K. A. Sharp, and B. H. Honig, 1988: Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: Method and error assessment. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 9(4), 327–335, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540090407.
He, W.-P., G.-L. Feng, W.-J. Dong, and J.-P. Li, 2006: On the predictability of the Lorenz system. Acta Physica Sinica, 55, 969–977, https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2006.02.088. (in Chinese with English abstract)
He, W. P., G. L. Feng, Q. Wu, S. Q. Wan, and J. F. Chou, 2008: A new method for abrupt change detection in dynamic structures. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 15, 601–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-601-2008.
He, W. P., X. Q. Xie, Y. Mei, S. Q. Wan, and S. S. Zhao, 2021: Decreasing predictability as a precursor indicator for abrupt climate change. Climate Dyn., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05676-1.
Lacarra, J. F., and O. Talagrand, 1988: Short-range evolution of small perturbations in a barotropic model. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 40, 81–95, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v40i2.11784.
Leith, C. E., 1965: Numerical simulation of the earth’s atmosphere. Methods in Computational Physics, 4, 1–28.
Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2011: Temporal-spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogs. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3265–3283, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05020.1.
Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2013: Temporal-spatial distribution of the predictability limit of monthly sea surface temperature in the global oceans. International Journal of Climatology, 33(8), 1936–1947, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3562.
Li, J. P., Q. C. Zeng, and J. F. Chou, 2000: Computational uncertainty principle in nonlinear ordinary differential equations (I)-Numerical results. Science in China (Series E), 43, 449–460, https://doi.org/10.1360/ye2000-43-5-449.
Li, X., R. Q. Ding, and J. P. Li, 2019: Determination of the backward predictability limit and its relationship with the forward predictability limit. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 669–677, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8205-z.
Li, X., R. Q. Ding, and J. P. Li, 2020a: Quantitative comparison of predictabilities of warm and cold events using the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent method. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 951–958, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2100-5.
Li, X., R. Q. Ding, and J. P. Li, 2020b: Quantitative study of the relative effects of initial condition and model uncertainties on local predictability in a nonlinear dynamical system. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139, 110094, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110094.
Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Lorenz, E. N., 1975: The physical bases of climate and climate modelling. Climate Predictability, 16, 132–136.
Lorenz, E. N., 1989: Effects of analysis and model errors on routine weather forecasts. Proc. ECMWF Seminar on Ten Years of Medium Range Weather Forecasting, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 115–128.
Lorenz, E. N., 2005: A look at some details of the growth of initial uncertainties. Tellus A, 57, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2005.00095.x.
Mintz, Y., 1968: Very long-term global integration of the primitive equations of atmospheric motion: An experiment in climate simulation. Causes of Climatic Change, D. E. Billings et al., Eds., Springer, 20–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-38-6_3.
Mu, M., and W. S. Duan, 2003: A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48, 1045–1047, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.
Mu, M., and Z. Y. Zhang, 2006: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations of a two-dimensional quasigeostrophic model. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1587–1604, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3703.1.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and J. C. Wang, 2002: The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 19, 191–204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 10, 493–501, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-10-493-2003.
Mukougawa, H., M. Kimoto, and S. Yoden, 1991: A relationship between local error growth and quasi-stationary states: Case study in the Lorenz system. J. Atmos. Sci, 48, 1231–1237, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1231:ARBLEG>2.0.CO;2.
Nese, J. M., 1989: Quantifying local predictability in phase space. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 35, 237–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(89)90105-X.
Oseledec, V. I., 1968: A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Characteristic ljapunov exponents of dynamical systems. Trans Moscow Math Soc, 19, 197–231.
Palmer, T. N., 1993: Extended-range atmospheric prediction and the Lorenz model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 49–66, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<0049:ERAPAT>2.0.CO;2.
Richardson, D. S., 1998: The relative effect of model and analysis differences on ECMWF and UKMO operational forecast. Proc. ECMWF Workshop on Predictability, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 363–372.
Sanz-Serna, J. M., and S. Larsson, 1993: Shadows, chaos, and saddles. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 13(3–3), 181–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9274(93)90141-D.
Smagorinsky, J., 1969: Problems and promises of deterministic extended range forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 50, 286–312, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-50.5.286.
Trevisan, A., and R. Legnani, 1995: Transient error growth and local predictability: A study in the Lorenz system. Tellus A, 47, 103–117, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3824.1.
Vallejo, J. C., and M. A. F. Sanjuán, 2013: Predictability of orbits in coupled systems through finite-time Lyapunov exponents. New Journal of Physics, 15(11), 113064, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113064.
Vallejo, J. C., and M. A. F. Sanjuán, 2015: The forecast of predictability for computed orbits in galactic models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447(4), 3797–3811, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2733.
Vannitsem, S., and Z. Toth, 2002: Short-term dynamics of model errors. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2594–2604, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2594:STDOME>2.0.CO;2.
Yoden, S., and M. Nomura, 1993: Finite-time Lyapunov stability analysis and its application to atmospheric predictability. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1531–1543, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1531:FTLSAA>2.0.CO;2.
Acknowledgments
This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42005054, 41975070) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M681154).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• This study introduces a new method to quantify predictabilities of LBPL of specific states with the presence of initial condition or model errors.
• The specific structure of the Lorenz attractor leads to a layered distribution of local backward predictability limits induced by the initial condition or model errors.
• The relative impacts of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability depend on the locations of given states on the dynamical trajectory and the error magnitudes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Feng, J., Ding, R. et al. Application of Backward Nonlinear Local Lyapunov Exponent Method to Assessing the Relative Impacts of Initial Condition and Model Errors on Local Backward Predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 38, 1486–1496 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0434-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0434-2