Abstract
Millimeter-wave cloud radar (MMCR) provides the capability of detecting the features of micro particles inside clouds and describing the internal microphysical structure of the clouds. Therefore, MMCR has been widely applied in cloud observations. However, due to the influence of non-meteorological factors such as insects, the cloud observations are often contaminated by non-meteorological echoes in the clear air, known as clear-air echoes. It is of great significance to automatically identify the clear-air echoes in order to extract effective meteorological information from the complex weather background. The characteristics of clear-air echoes are studied here by combining data from four devices: an MMCR, a laser-ceilometer, an L-band radiosonde, and an all-sky camera. In addition, a new algorithm, which includes feature extraction, feature selection, and classification, is proposed to achieve the automatic identification of clear-air echoes. The results show that the recognition algorithm is fairly satisfied in both simple and complex weather conditions. The recognition accuracy can reach up to 95.86% for the simple cases when cloud echoes and clear-air echoes are separate, and 88.38% for the complicated cases when low cloud echoes and clear-air echoes are mixed.
摘要
毫米波云雷达 (MMCR) 不仅能够探测到云中微小粒子的特征信息, 还可以获取云内的微物理结构, 所以在云的观测领域得到了广泛应用. 但是, 由于诸如昆虫之类的非气象因素的影响, 云观测通常会被晴空中的非气象回波污染, 这被称为晴空回波. 如何在这种复杂天气背景下消除晴空回波的干扰, 并从雷达回波中提取有用气象信息, 具有重要研究意义和实用价值. 通过结合以下四个设备的数据来研究晴空回波的特性: MMCR, 激光云高仪, L 波段探空仪和全天空成像仪. 此外, 提出了一种新的算法, 该算法包括特征提取, 特征选择和特征筛选, 以实现晴空回波的自动识别. 结果表明, 在简单和复杂的天气条件下, 该识别算法都令人满意. 在云回波和晴空回波分开的简单情况下, 识别精度可以达到 95.86%, 在低云回波和晴空回波混合在一起的复杂情况下, 识别精度可以达到 88.38%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amjady, N., A. Daraeepour, and F. Keynia, 2010: Day-ahead electricity price forecasting by modified relief algorithm and hybrid neural network. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 4(3), 432–444, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0297.
Bai, Y., Y. Li, X. X. Wang, J. J. Xie, and C. Li, 2016: Air pollutants concentrations forecasting using back propagation neural network based on wavelet decomposition with meteorological conditions. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7, 557–566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.0L004.
Bao, Y. D., Y. P. Wu, and Y. He, 2004: Optimal Mix forecasting method based on BP neutral network and its application. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 3, 162–164, https://doi.org/10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2004.03.074.
Clothiaux, E. E., T. P. Ackerman, G. G. Mace, K. P. Moran, R. T. Marchand, M. A. Miller, and B. E. Martner, 2000: Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the ARM CART sites. J. Appl. Meteorol., 39(5), 645–665, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0645:ODOCHA>2.0.CO;2.
Fabry, F., C. Frush, I. Zawadzki, and A. Kilambi, 1997: On the extraction of near-surface index of refraction using radar phase measurements from ground targets. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 4, 978–987, https://doi.org/10.1155/11200-4266(1997)014<0978:OTEONS>2.0.CO;2.
Frisch, A. S., C. W. Fairall, and J. B. Snider, 1995: Measurement of stratus cloud and drizzle parameters in ASTEX with a Ka-band Doppler radar and a microwave radiometer. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2788–2799, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<2788:MOSCAD>2.0.CO;2.
Gauthreaux, S., and R. Diehl, 2020: Discrimination of biological scatterers in polarimetric weather radar data: Opportunities and challenges. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 545, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030545.
Geerts, B., and Q. Miao, 2004: The use of millimeter Doppler radar echoes to estimate vertical air velocities in the fair-weather convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22(3), 225–246, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1699.1.
He, J. F., W. Q. Liu, Y. J. Zhang, Z. Y. Chen, J. Ruan, and L. M. Wang, 2011: A denoising method for backscatter signal of laser ceilometer based on Hilbert-Huang transform. Acta Optica Sinica, 31, 0201001, https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS201131.0201001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Hogan, R. J., N. Gaussiat, and A. J. Illingworth, 2005: Stratocumulus liquid water content from dual-wavelength radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 1207–1218, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1768.1.
Jacoby-Koaly, S., B. Campistron, S. Bernard, B. Bénech, F. Ardhuin-Girard, J. Dessens, E. Dupont, and B. Carissimo, 2002: Turbulent dissipation rate in the boundary layer via UHF wind profiler Doppler spectral width measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 103, 361–389, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014985111855.
Kalapureddy, M. C. R., and Coauthors, 2018: A simple biota removal algorithm for 35 GHz cloud radar measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 11, 1417–1436, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1417-2018.
Kessinger, C., S. Ellis, and J. Van Andel, 2003: The radar echo classifier: A fuzzy logic algorithm for the WSR-88D. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications to the Environmental Science, Benalmadena, Spain, AMS, 40–45.
Kollias, P., and B. Albrecht, 2000: The turbulence structure in a continental stratocumulus cloud from millimeter-wavelength radar observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2417–2434, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2417:TTSIAC>2.0.CO;2.
Kollias, P., B. A. Albrecht, R. Lhermitte, and A. Savtchenko, 2001: Radar observations of updrafts, downdrafts, and turbulence in fair-weather cumuli. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1750–1766, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1750:ROOUDA>2.0.CO;2.
Lu, Y. H., K. Aydin, E. E. Clothiaux, and J. Verlinde, 2015: Retrieving cloud ice water content using millimeter- and centimeter-wavelength radar polarimetric observables. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 54, 596–604, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0169.1.
Luke, E. P., P. Kollias, and K. L. Johnson, 2008: A technique for the automatic detection of insect clutter in cloud radar returns. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 25, 1498–1513, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA953.1.
Melnikov, V. M., M. J. Istok, and J. K. Westbrook, 2015: Asymmetric radar echo patterns from insects. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 32, 659–674, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00247.1.
Nashashibi, A., and F. T. Ulaby, 2001: Millimeter-wave radar detection of partially obscured targets. Proc. 2001 Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp. Held in Conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, IEEE.
Oh, S.-B., Y.-H. Kim, K.-H. Kim, C.-H. Cho, and E. Lim, 2016: Verification and correction of cloud base and top height retrievals from Ka-band cloud radar in Boseong, Korea. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33(1), 73–84, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5058-y.
Paulsen, W. H., P. J. Petrocchi, and G. McLean, 1970: Operational utilization of the AN/TPQ-11 cloud detection radar. Air Force Cambridge Research Labs Instrumentation Papers, 166–168.
Russell, R. W., and J. W. Wilson, 1997: Radar-observed “fine Lines” in the optically clear boundary layer: Reflectivity contributions from aerial plankton and its predators. Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 82, 235–262, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000237431851.
Sassen, K., G. G. Mace, and Z. E. Wang, 1999: Continental stratus clouds: A case study using coordinated remote sensing and aircraft measurements. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2345–2358, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2345:CSCACS>2.0.CO;2.
Tang, Y., 2014: The scattering mechanism and analysis of clear-air echo. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology. M.S. thesis, 67 pp, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Yin, J. P., C. Unal, and H. Russchenberg, 2018: Object-orientated filter design in spectral domain for polarimetric weather radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57(5), 2725–2740, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2876632.
Zhao, J., X. Z. Cao, T. G. Dai, Z. C. Wang, D. D. Chen, and D. Zheng, 2017: Comparative analysis of cloud observed by millimeter wave cloud radar and sounding. Meteorological Monthly, 43(1), 101–107, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2017.01.011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1506605), Sichuan Provincial Department of Education Scientific research projects (Grant No. 16ZB0211) and Chengdu University of Information Technology research and development projects (Grant No. CRF20 1705). The authors would like to acknowledge the Meteorological Observation Centre of the CMA and the southern suburb observatory in Beijing for providing the data used in this study. Last but not least, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and comments, which helped to improve this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• Measurements from a laser ceilometer, MMCR, L-band radiosonde, and all-sky camera are used to delineate clear-air echoes and cloud echoes.
• Features are filtered using the Relief algorithm to obtain the optimal feature subset, from which the neural network algorithm is trained to realize the automatic recognition of the clear-air echoes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, L., Wang, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Automatic Identification of Clear-Air Echoes Based on Millimeter-wave Cloud Radar Measurements. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 37, 912–924 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9270-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9270-z
Key words
- millimeter-wave cloud radar
- clear-air echoes
- neural network
- laser ceilometer
- all-sky camera
- feature extraction
- feature selection