Advertisement

Advances in Atmospheric Sciences

, Volume 36, Issue 10, pp 1047–1059 | Cite as

Characteristics of Surface Solar Radiation under Different Air Pollution Conditions over Nanjing, China: Observation and Simulation

  • Hao Luo
  • Yong Han
  • Chunsong LuEmail author
  • Jun Yang
  • Yonghua Wu
Original Paper

Abstract

Surface solar radiation (SSR) can affect climate, the hydrological cycle, plant photosynthesis, and solar power. The values of solar radiation at the surface reflect the influence of human activity on radiative climate and environmental effects, so it is a key parameter in the evaluation of climate change and air pollution due to anthropogenic disturbances. This study presents the characteristics of the SSR variation in Nanjing, China, from March 2016 to June 2017, using a combined set of pyranometer and pyrheliometer observations. The SSR seasonal variation and statistical properties are investigated and characterized under different air pollution levels and visibilities. We discuss seasonal variations in visibility, air quality index (AQI), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and their correlations with SSR. The scattering of solar radiation by particulate matter varies significantly with particle size. Compared with the particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter between 2.5 µm and 10 µm (PM2.5–10), we found that the PM2.5 dominates the variation of scattered radiation due to the differences of single-scattering albedo and phase function. Because of the correlation between PM2.5 and SSR, it is an effective and direct method to estimate PM2.5 by the value of SSR, or vice versa to obtain the SSR by the value of PM2.5. Under clear-sky conditions (clearness index ➞0.5), the visibility is negatively correlated with the diffuse fraction, AQI, PM10, and PM2.5, and their correlation coefficients are −0.50, −0.60, −0.76, and −0.92, respectively. The results indicate the linkage between scattered radiation and air quality through the value of visibility.

Key words

surface solar radiation air pollution particulate matter visibility radiative transfer 

摘要

地表太阳辐射(SSR)可以影响气候, 水循环, 植物光合作用和太阳能. 地表太阳辐射的值反映了人类活动对辐射的气候和环境效应的影响, 是评价气候变化和空气污染的关键参数. 本研究利用2016年3月至2017年6月在中国南京地区的辐射计观测数据, 分析了SSR的变化特征. 同时, 本文还分析了不同空气污染等级和不同能见度下SSR的季节变化和统计特征. 此外, 我们讨论了能见度, 空气质量指数(AQI), 颗粒物(PM10和PM2.5)的季节变化及其与SSR之间的关系. 颗粒物对地表太阳辐射的散射能力与颗粒物的粒径大小有关. 与空气动力学直径在2.5µm至10µm间的颗粒物相比, 由于单次散射反照率和相函数的差异, PM2.5对太阳辐射的散射更强. 基于PM2.5与SSR之间较好的相关性, 用SSR 的值来估计PM2.5, 或者用PM2.5的值来估计SSR, 都是直接有效的方法. 在晴空条件下(晴空指数≥0.5), 能见度与散射分数, AQI, PM10和PM2.5都呈负相关关系, 它们的相关系数分别为-0.50, -0.60, -0.76和-0.92. 这一结果表明, 散射辐射与空气质量之间的关系可以通过能见度的值相联系. 所以, 我们可以通过在SBDART模式中输入能见度的值来模拟晴空天气下不同污染等级所对应的SSR.

关键词

地表太阳辐射 空气污染 颗粒物 能见度 辐射传输 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775026, 41075012, 40805006, 91544230, 41822504, 41575133, and 41675030), the National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2016YFC0203303), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant Nos. BE2015151 and BK20160041). In addition, the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which greatly helped to improve the quality of this article.

References

  1. Bendix, J., 1995: A case study on the determination of fog optical depth and liquid water path using AVHRR data and relations to fog liquid water content and horizontal visibility. Int. J. Remote Sens., 16, 515–530,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, Z. Y., Y. F. Zheng, J. J. Liu, Y. Lü, and R. J. Wu, 2009: Analysis of solar radiation and relative factors in Yangtze River Delta of China. Scientia Meteorologica Sinica, 29, 447–453,  https://doi.org/10.3969/jissn.1009-0827.2009.04.003. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Cao, C., X. Lee, S. D. Liu, N. Schultz, W. Xiao, M. Zhang, and L. Zhao, 2016: Urban heat islands in China enhanced by haze pollution. Nature Communications, 7, 12509,  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1995: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models. Science, 267, 496–499,  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5197.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Che, H. Z., G. Y. Shi, X. Y. Zhang, R. Arimoto, J. Q. Zhao, L. Xu, B. Wang, Z. H. Chen, 2005: Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from China, 1961–2000. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L06803,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dayan, U., B. Ziv, T. Shoob, and Y. Enzel, 2008: Suspended dust over southwestern Mediterranean and its relation to atmospheric circulations. International Journal of Climatology, 28, 915–924,  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, H. T., and R. F. Pueschel, 1971: Solar radiation: Absence of air pollution trends at Mauna Loa. Science, 172, 845–846,  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3985.845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haverkort, A. J., D. Uenk, H. Veroude, and M. Van De Waart, 1991: Relationships between ground cover, intercepted solar radiation, leaf area index and infrared reflectance of potato crops. Potato Research, 34, 113–121,  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayasaka, T., 2016: The long-term variation in surface shortwave irradiance in China and Japan: A review. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 94, 393–414,  https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haywood, J., and O. Boucher, 2000: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review. Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543,  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hess, M., P. Koepke, and I. Schult, 1998: Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: The software package OPAC. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 831–844,  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:OPOAAC>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horvath, H., and K. E. Noll, 1969: The relationship between atmospheric light scattering coefficient and visibility. Atmos. Environ., 3, 543–550,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(69)90044-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, B., and Coauthors, 2017: Quantification of the impact of aerosol on broadband solar radiation in North China. Scientific Reports, 7, 44851,  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jandaghian, Z., and H. Akbar, 2017: The effects of aerosol-radiation-cloud interactions on air quality over North America during heatwave period. Preprints, 6th International Conf. on Climate Change Adaptation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, D. P., and Y. Qian, 2002: Decreasing trends in sunshine duration over China for 1954–1998: Indication of increased haze pollution? Geophys Res. Lett., 29, 2042,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kundu, S. S., A. Borgohain, N. Barman, M. Devi, and P. L. N. Raju, 2018: Spatial variability and radiative impact of aerosol along the Brahmaputra River Valley in India: Results from a campaign. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 405–430,  https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2018.94026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuye, A., and S. S. Jagtap, 1992: Analysis of solar radiation data for Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Solar Energy, 49, 139–145,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(92)90148-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lelieveld, J., and Coauthors, 2002: Global air pollution crossroads over the Mediterranean. Science, 298, 794,  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, D. H. W., C. C. S. Lau, and J. C. Lam, 2004: Overcast sky conditions and luminance distribution in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 39, 101–108,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liepert, B. G., 2002: Observed reductions of surface solar radiation at sites in the United States and worldwide from 1961 to 1990. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1421,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, B. Y. H., and R. C. Jordan, 1960: The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation. Solar Energy, 4, 1–19,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(60)90062-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lohmann, U., and J. Feichter, 2005: Global indirect aerosol effects: A review. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 715–737,  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Obregón, M. A., A. Serrano, M. J. Costa, and A. M. Silva, 2015: Validation of libRadtran and SBDART models under different aerosol conditions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 28, 012010,  https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/28/1/012010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okogbue, E. C., J. A. Adedokun, and B. Holmgren, 2009: Hourly and daily clearness index and diffuse fraction at a tropical station, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. International Journal of Climatology, 29, 1035–1047,  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Park, R. J., D. J. Jacob, N. Kumar, and R. M. Yantosca, 2006: Regional visibility statistics in the United States: Natural and transboundary pollution influences, and implications for the Regional Haze Rule. Atmos. Environ., 40, 5405–5423,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinker, R. T., B. Zhang, and E. G. Dutton, 2005: Do satellites detect trends in surface solar radiation? Science, 308, 850–854,  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Power, H. C., 2003: Trends in solar radiation over Germany and an assessment of the role of aerosols and sunshine duration. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 76, 47–63,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-003-0005-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qian, Y., and F. Giorgi, 2000: Regional climatic effects of anthropogenic aerosols? The case of southwestern China. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3521–3524,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qian, Y., F. Giorgi, Y. Huang, W. Chameides, and C. Luo, 2001: Regional simulation of anthropogenic sulfur over East Asia and its sensitivity to model parameters. Tellus, 53, 171–191,  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v53i2.16573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qian, Y., D. P. Kaiser, L. R. Leung, and M. Xu, 2006: More frequent cloud-free sky and less surface solar radiation in China from 1955 to 2000. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L01812,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024586.Google Scholar
  31. Qian, Y., W. G. Wang, L. R. Leung, and D. P. Kaiser, 2007: Variability of solar radiation under cloud-free skies in China: The role of aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12804,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qu, Y. W., Y. Han, Y. H. Wu, P. Gao, and T. J. Wang, 2017: Study of PBLH and its correlation with particulate matter from one-year observation over Nanjing, southeast China. Remote Sensing, 9, 668,  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qu, Y. W., and Coauthors, 2018: Influence of atmospheric particulate matter on ozone in Nanjing, China: Observational study and mechanistic analysis. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1381–1395,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-8027-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramanathan, V., and A. M. Vogelmann, 1997: Greenhouse effect, atmospheric solar absorption and the earth’s radiation budget: From the Arrhenius-Langley Era to the 1990s. Ambio, 26, 38–46.Google Scholar
  35. Ricchiazzi, P., S. R. Yang, C. Gautier, and D. Sowle, 1998: SBDART: A research and teaching software tool for plane-parallel radiative transfer in the earth’s atmosphere. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 2101–2114,  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2101:SARATS>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodhe, H., and J. Grandell, 1972: On the removal time of aerosol particles from the atmosphere by precipitation scavenging. Tellus, 24, 442–454,  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v24i5.10658.Google Scholar
  37. Sengupta, M., and Coauthors, 2015: Best practices handbook for the collection and use of solar resource data for solar energy applications. NREL/TP-5D00-63112, 236 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Shen, Y. B., Z. C. Zhao, and G. Y. Shi, 2008: The progress in variation of surface solar radiation, factors and probable climatic effects. Advances in Earth Science, 23, 915–923,  https://doi.org/10.11867/jissn.1001-8166.2008.09.0915. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Sheng, P. X., J. T. Mao, J. G. Li, Z. M. Ge, A. C. Zhang, J. G. Sang, N. X. Pan, H. S. Zhang, 2003: Atmospheric Physics. Peiking University Press, 531 pp. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Tselioudis, G., and W. B. Rossow, 1994: Global, multiyear variations of optical thickness with temperature in low and cirrus clouds. Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2211–2214,  https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Varotsos, C. A., G. J. Chronopoulos, S. Katsikis, and N. K. Sakellariou, 1995: Further evidence of the role of air pollution on solar ultraviolet radiation reaching the ground. Int. J. Remote Sens., 16, 1883–1886,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vautard, R., P. Yiou, and G. J. van Oldenborgh, 2009: Decline of fog, mist and haze in Europe over the past 30 years. Nature Geoscience, 2, 115–119,  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, H., F. B. Sun, and W. B. Liu, 2018a: Spatial and temporal patterns as well as major influencing factors of global and diffuse Horizontal Irradiance over China: 1960–2014. Solar Energy, 159, 601–615,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, H. L., B. Zhu, H. Q. Kang, L. J. Shen, and C. Pan, 2011: Seasonal variations of PM10 and PM2.1 in different functional areas in Nanjing. Journal of the Meteorological Sciences, 31, 16–23,  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0827.2011.z1.003. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Wang, J. Z., and Coauthors, 2018b: Interdecadal changes of summer aerosol pollution in the Yangtze River Basin of China, the relative influence of meteorological conditions and the relation to climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 630, 46–52,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, L. D., D. R. Lü, and Q. He, 2015: The impact of surface properties on downward surface shortwave radiation over the Tibetan Plateau. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 759–771,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-4131-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, N., Z. H. Ling, X. J. Deng, T. Deng, X. P. Lyu, T. Y. Li, X. R. Gao, and X. Chen, 2018c: Source contributions to PM2.5 under unfavorable weather conditions in Guangzhou City, China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1145–1159,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, T. J., and Coauthors, 2012: Urban air quality and regional haze weather forecast for Yangtze River Delta region. Atmos. Environ., 58, 70–83,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wild, M., and Coauthors, 2005: From dimming to brightening: Decadal changes in solar radiation at earth’s surface. Science, 308, 847–850,  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu, J., C. B. Fu, L. Y. Zhang, and J. P. Tang, 2012: Trends of visibility on sunny days in China in the recent 50 years. Atmos. Environ., 55, 339–346,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang, J., Q. L. Min, W. T. Lu, Y. Ma, W. Yao, and T. S. Lu, 2017: An RGB channel operation for removal of the difference of atmospheric scattering and its application on total sky cloud detection. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10, 1191–1201,  https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1191-2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang, S., G. Y. Shi, B. Wang, H. L. Yang, and Y. X. Duan, 2013: Trends in Surface Solar Radiation (SSR) and the Effect of Clouds on SSR during 1961–2009 in China. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 37, 963–970,  https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.11122. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Zerefos, C. S., K. Eleftheratos, C. Meleti, S. Kazadzis, A. Romanou, C. Ichoku, G. Tselioudis, and A. Bais, 2009: Solar dimming and brightening over Thessaloniki, Greece, and Beijing, China. Tellus, 61, 657–665,  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00425.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Y. L., B. Q. Qin, and W. M. Chen, 2004: Analysis of 40 year records of solar radiation data in Shanghai, Nanjing and Hangzhou in Eastern China. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 78, 217–227,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-003-0030-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zheng, R., S. Z. Kang, L. Tong, and S. E. Li, 2012: Water consumption of wine grape under different weather conditions in desert oasis. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28, 99–107. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Zhu, B., H. L. Wang, L. J. Shen, H. Q. Kang, and X. N. Yu, 2013: Aerosol spectra and new particle formation observed in various seasons in Nanjing. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1632–1644,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2202-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Atmospheric Physics/Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Luo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong Han
    • 2
  • Chunsong Lu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jun Yang
    • 3
  • Yonghua Wu
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, School of Atmospheric PhysicsNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Severe WeatherChinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.NOAA-CRESTCity College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations