GPS water vapor and its comparison with radiosonde and ERA-Interim data in Algeria
- 66 Downloads
Remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using global positioning system (GPS) data has become an effective tool in meteorology, weather forecasting and climate research. This paper presents the estimation of precipitable water (PW) from GPS observations and meteorological data in Algeria, over three stations located at Algiers, Bechar and Tamanrasset. The objective of this study is to analyze the sensitivity of the GPS PW estimates for the three sites to the weighted mean temperature (Tm), obtained separately from two types of Tm–Ts regression [one general, and one developed specifically for Algeria (Ts stands for surface temperature)], and calculated directly from ERA-Interim data. The results show that the differences in Tm are of the order of 18 K, producing differences of 2.01 mm in the final evaluation of PW. A good agreement is found between GPS-PW and PW calculated from radiosondes, with a small mean difference with Vaisala radiosondes. A comparison between GPS and ERA-Interim shows a large difference (4 mm) in the highlands region. This difference is possibly due to the topography. These first results are encouraging, in particular for meteorological applications in this region, with good hope to extend our dataset analysis to a more complete, nationwide coverage over Algeria.
Key wordsGPS atmospheric water vapor radiosonde ERA-Interim
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bevis, M., S. Businger, T. A. Herring, C. Rocken, R. A. Anthes, and R. H. Ware, 1992: GPS meteorology: Remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 15 787–15 801, doi: 10.1029/92 JD01517.Google Scholar
- Brenot, H., V. Ducrocq, A. Walpersdorf, C. Champollion, and O. Caumont, 2006: GPS zenith delay sensitivity evaluated from high-resolution numerical weather prediction simulations of the 8-9 September 2002 flash flood over southeastern France. J. Geophys. Res., 111, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005726.Google Scholar
- Businger, S., Chiswell, S. R., Ulmer, W. C., and Johnson, R., 1996: Balloons as a Lagrangian measurement platform for atmospheric research. J. Geophys. Res, 101, doi: 10.1029/95JD 00559.Google Scholar
- Kos, T., M. Botinčan, and A. Dlesk, 2009: Mitigating GNSS Positioning Errors due to Atmospheric Signal Delays. Pomorstvo, 23, 495–513.Google Scholar
- Mengistu Tsidu, G., T. Blumenstock, and F. Hase, 2015: Observations of precipitable water vapour over complex topography of Ethiopia from ground-based GPS, FTIR, radiosonde and ERA-Interim reanalysis. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8, 3277–3295, doi: 10.5194/amt-8-3277-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nash, J., T. Oakley, H. Vömel, and L. I. Wei, 2011: WMO intercomparison of high quality radiosonde systems, Yangjiang, China, 12 July–3 August 2010. IOM Rep. 107, WMO/TD 1580, World Meteorological Organization, 238 pp.Google Scholar
- Saastamoinen, J., 1972: Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, S. W. Henriksen, A. Mancini, and B. H. Chovitz, AGU, Washington, D.C., 247–251.Google Scholar
- Teregoning, P., Boers, R. O’Brier, D., Hendy, M., 1998: Accuracy of absolute precipitable water vapor estimates from GPS observations. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmopsheres, 103, 28.Google Scholar
- Torres, B., V. E. Cachorro, C. Toledano, J. P. Ortiz de Galisteo, A. Berjón, A. M. de Frutos, Y. Bennouna, and N. Laulainen, 2010: Precipitable water vapor characterization in the Gulf of Cadiz region (southwestern Spain) based on Sun photometer, GPS, and radiosonde data. J. Geophys. Res., 115, doi: 10.1029/2009JD012724.Google Scholar
- Vey, S., R. Dietrich, M. Fritsche, A. Rülke, P. Steigenberger, and M. Rothacher, 2009: On the homogeneity and interpretation of precipitable water time series derived from global GPS observations. J. Geophys. Res., 114, doi: 10.1029/2008JD 010415.Google Scholar