Abstract
To understand the strengths and limitations of a low-resolution version of Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land-Sea-ice (FGOALS-gl) to simulate the climate of the last millennium, the energy balance, climate sensitivity and absorption feedback of the model are analyzed. Simulation of last-millennium climate was carried out by driving the model with natural (solar radiation and volcanic eruptions) and anthropogenic (greenhouse gases and aerosols) forcing agents. The model feedback factors for (model sensitivity to) different forcings were calculated. The results show that the system feedback factor is about 2.5 (W m−2) K−1 in the pre-industrial period, while 1.9 (W m−2) K−1 in the industrial era. Thus, the model’s sensitivity to natural forcing is weak, which explains why it reproduces a weak Medieval Warm Period. The relatively reasonable simulation of the Little Ice Age is caused by both the specified radiative forcing and unforced linear cold drift. The model sensitivity in the industrial era is higher than that of the pre-industrial period. A negative net cloud radiative feedback operates during whole-millennial simulation and reduces the model’s sensitivity to specified forcing. The negative net cloud radiative forcing feedback under natural forcing in the period prior to 1850 is due to the underestimation (overestimation) of the response of cloudiness (in-cloud water path). In the industrial era, the strong tropospheric temperature response enlarges the effective radius of ice clouds and reduces the fractional ice content within cloud, resulting in a weak negative net cloud feedback in the industrial period. The water vapor feedback in the industrial era is also stronger than that in the pre-industrial period. Both are in favor of higher model sensitivity and thus a reasonable simulation of the 20th century global warming.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammann, C. M., F. Joos, D. S. Schimel, B. L. Otto-Bliesner, and R. A. Tomas, 2007: Solar influence on climate during the past millennium: Results from transient simulations with the NCAR Climate System Model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 3713–3718.
Barkstrom, B. R., and G. L. Smith, 1986: The earth radiation budget experiment-Science and implementation. Rev. Geophys., 24, 379–390.
Cess, R. D., and G. L. Potter, 1988: A methodology for understanding and intercomparing atmospheric climate feedback processes in general-circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 8305–8314.
Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1990: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16601–16615.
Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1996: Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update. J. Geophys. Res., 101D, 12791–12794.
Collins, W. D., and Coauthors, 2003: Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM2). NCAR Tech. Notes, Climate and Global Dynamics Division Boulder, Colorado, 109–110.
Colman, R., 2003: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Climate Dyn., 20, 865–873.
Crowley, T. J., 2000: Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years. Science, 289, 270–277.
Doutriaux-Boucher, M., and G. Sèze, 1998: Significant changes between the ISCCP C and D cloud climatologies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4193–4196.
Forster, P. M., and J. M. Gregory, 2006: The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget data. J. Climate, 19, 39–52.
Forster, P. M., and K. E. Taylor, 2006: Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Climate, 19, 6181–6194.
Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018747.
Harrison, E. F., P. Minnis, B. R. Barkstrom, V. Ramanathan, R. D. Cess, and G. Gibson, 1990: Seasonal variation of cloud radiative forcing derived from the earth radiation budget experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 18687–18703.
Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2000: Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 441–475.
Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden, 2006: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Climate, 19, 5686–5698.
Houghton, J. T., G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, 1990: Scientific Assessment of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 365pp.
Houghton, J. T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, 881pp.
Jansen, E., and Coauthors, 2007: Palaeoclimate. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 748–845.
Kiehl, J. T., 1994: On the observed near cancellation between longwave and shortwave cloud forcing in tropical regions. J. Climate, 7(4), 559–565.
Kristjánsson, J. E., and J. Kristiansen, 2000: Impact of a new scheme for optical properties of ice crystals on climates of two GCMs. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10063–10079.
Man, W. M., and T. J. Zhou, 2011: Forced response of atmospheric oscillations during the last millennium simulated by a climate system model. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 3042–3052.
Man, W. M., T. J. Zhou, J. Zhang, C. Wu, and B. Wu, 2010a: The equilibrium response of LASG/IAP climate system model to prescribed external forcing of little ice age. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 914–924. (in Chinese)
Man, W. M., T. J. Zhou, and L. X. Zhang, 2010b: The tropical Pacific interannual variability simulated by LASG/IAP climate system model FGOALS-gl. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1141–1154. (in Chinese)
Manabe, S., and R. T. Wetherald, 1967: Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 241–259.
Meehl, G. A., W. M. Washington, C. Ammann, J. M. Arblaster, T. M. L. Wigley, and C. Tebaldi, 2004: Combination of natural and anthropogenic forcings and 20th century climate. J. Climate, 17, 3721–3727.
Mann, M. E., Z. Zhang, S. Rutherford, R. Bradley, M. Hughes, D. Shindell, C. Ammann, G. Faluvegi and F. Ni, 2009: Global signatures and dynamical origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval climate anomaly. Science, 326, 1256–1260
Ramanathan, V., R. D. Cess, E. F. Harrison, P. Minnis, B. R. Barkstorm, E. Ahmad, and D. Hartmann, 1989: Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science, 243(4887), 57–63.
Slingo, A., 1989: A GCM parameterization for the shortwave radiative properties of water clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 1419–1427.
Soden, B. J., A. J. Broccoli, and R. S. Hemler, 2004: On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedbacks. J. Climate, 17, 3661–3665.
Sun, D. Z., and Coauthors, 2003: On the Radiative and dynamical feedbacks over the equatorial cold-tongue. J. Climate, 16, 2425–2432.
Sun, D. Z., and Coauthors, 2006: Radiative and dynamic feedbacks over the equatorial cold-tongue: Results from nine atmospheric GCMs. J. Climate, 19, 4059–4074.
Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, 2012: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 485–498.
Wen, X., T. J. Zhou, S. Wang, B. Wang, H. Wan, and J. Li, 2007: Performance of a reconfigured atmospheric general circulation model at low resolution. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24, 712–728, doi: 10.1007/s00376-007-0712-7.
Wetherald, R. T., and S. Manabe, 1988: Cloud feedback processes in general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1397–1415.
Zhang, J., 2010: General features of climate changes during the last 1000 years in a climate system model. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Paris: L’Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, 8–9.
Zhang, J., T. J. Zhou, W. M. Man, and Z. Li, 2009: The transient simulation of little ice age by LASG/IAP climate system model. Quaternary Sciences, 29, 1125–1134. (in Chinese)
Zhang, M., and C. Bretherton, 2008: Mechanisms of low cloud-climate feedback in idealized single-column simulations with the community atmospheric model, version 3 (CAM3). J. Climate, 21, 4859–4878.
Zhang, M., J. J. Hack, J. T. Kiehl, and R. D. Cess, 1994: Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5525–5537.
Zhang, Y., W. B. Rossow, A. A. Lacis, V. Oinas, and M. Mishchenko, 2004: Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, doi: 1029/2003JD004457.
Zhou, T. J., and R. C. Yu, 2006: Twentieth century sur face air temperature over China and the globe simulated by coupled climate models. J. Climate, 19(22), 5843–5858.
Zhou, T. J., B. Wu, X. Y. Wen, L. J. Li, and B. Wang, 2008: A fast version of LASG/IAP climate system model and its 1000-year control integration. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 25, 655–672, doi: 10.1007/s00376-008-0655-7.
Zhou, T. J., B. Li, W.M. Man, L. X. Zhang, and J. Zhang, 2011: A comparison of the medieval warm period, the little ice age and the 20th century warming simulated by FGOALS climate system model. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 3028–3041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Z., Zhou, T. Why does FGOALS-gl reproduce a weak Medieval Warm Period but a reasonable Little Ice Age and 20th century warming?. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 30, 1758–1770 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2227-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2227-8