Skip to main content
Log in

Denitrification and total fertilizer-N losses from an irrigated cotton field

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 In a 2-year field study, denitrification loss was measured from an irrigated sandy-clay loam under cotton receiving urea-N at 158–173 kg ha–1. An acetylene inhibition-soil core method was employed for the direct measurement of denitrification, considering also the N2O entrapped in the soil. Taking into account the N2O evolved from soil cores and that entrapped in the soil, a total of 65.7 kg N ha–1 and 64.4 kg N ha–1 was lost due to denitrification during the 1995 and 1996 cotton-growing seasons, respectively. Most (>70%) of the denitrification loss occurred during June–August, a period characterized by high soil temperatures and heavy monsoon rains. On average, 35% of the denitrification-N2O was found entrapped in the soil and the amount of entrapped N2O was significantly correlated with head space N2O concentration and with water-filled pore space. 15N-balance during the 1996 growing season revealed a loss of 71.8 kg N ha–1. It was concluded that a substantial proportion of the fertilizer-N applied to irrigated cotton is lost under the semiarid subtropical climatic conditions prevailing in the Central Punjab region of Pakistan and that denitrification is the major N loss process under irrigated cotton in this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 8 March 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmood, T., Ali, R., Sajjad, M. et al. Denitrification and total fertilizer-N losses from an irrigated cotton field. Biol Fertil Soils 31, 270–278 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050656

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050656

Navigation