Application of hydrochar and pyrochar to manure is not effective for mitigation of ammonia emissions from cattle slurry and poultry manure
- 253 Downloads
Nitrogen (N) loss as ammonia (NH3) from agricultural systems is one of the major sources of atmospheric pollutants and is responsible for more than 50% of global NH3 emissions. Ammonia volatilization from animal manures may be altered by amendment with chars derived from pyrolysis (pyrochars) or hydrothermal carbonization (hydrochars) by providing exchange sites for ammonium (NH4+) or changing the pH of manure. Pyrochar and hydrochar differ in chemical and structural composition, specific surface area, and pH and therefore may affect NH3 volatilization differently. In a laboratory incubation experiment, we investigated the effect of pyrochar (pH 9.0) and hydrochar (pH 3.8) from Miscanthus on NH3 emission after addition to poultry manure and cattle slurry. We analyzed manure treatments with and without char addition and acidification and determined the effect of char addition on immobilization of manure-derived NH4+. Ammonia emission from pure poultry manure amounted 84% of the applied NH4+-N, while 67% of the applied NH4+-N was lost as NH3 from cattle slurry. Addition of pyrochar or hydrochar had no or only marginal effects on NH3 emissions except for a reduction in NH3 emissions by 19% due to hydrochar application to CS (p < 0.05), which seems to be primarily related to the char pH. Sorption of NH4+ by admixture of chars to manure was generally small: between 0.1- and 0.5-mg NH4+-N g−1 chars were sorbed. This corresponds to between 0.1 and 3.5% of the NH4+ applied, which obviously was not strong enough to reduce emissions of NH3. Overall, our results do not provide evidence that addition of pyrochar or hydrochar to cattle slurry and poultry manure is an effective measure to reduce NH3 volatilization.
KeywordsNitrogen Cattle slurry Poultry manure Pyrochar Hydrochar Miscanthus pH Soil
We thank Frank Hegewald and Dagmar Wenderoth for taking NH3 samples and for support on construction of the incubation system; Regina Lausch and Silke Weiss for sample preparation; Ute Tambor, Sabine Wathsack, and Monika Zerbian for laboratory analyses and Stefan Burkart for technical instructions and support. We thank the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute of Animal Nutrition (Braunschweig, Germany) and the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry (Celle, Germany) for providing the manures.
This project was financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG-Research Training Group 1397 “Regulation of soil organic matter and nutrient turnover in organic agriculture,” University of Kassel).
- Cao XY, Ro KS, Chappell M, Li YA, Mao JD (2011) Chemical structures of swine-manure chars produced under different carbonization conditions investigated by advanced solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Energy Fuel 25:388–397. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101342v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Commission of the European Communities (2005) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament—thematic strategy on air pollution. URL: http://www.central2013.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Document_Centre/OP_Resources/03_Thematic_strategy_on_air_pollution_com_en.pdf
- Fenn LB, Matocha JE, Wu E (1981) A comparison of calcium carbonate precipitation and pH depression on calcium-reduced ammonia loss from surface-applied urea. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1128–1131. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060023x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferguson RB, Kissel DE, Koelliker JK, Basel W (1984) Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea: effect of hydrogen ion buffering capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:578–582. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800030022x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang T, Gao B, Hu X-K, Lu X, Well R, Christie P, Bakken LR, Ju X-T (2014) Ammonia-oxidation as an engine to generate nitrous oxide in an intensively managed calcareous Fluvo-aquic soil. Sci Rep 4 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03950
- Jordan G, Predotova M, Ingold M, Goenster S, Dietz H, Joergensen RG, Buerkert A (2015) Effects of activated charcoal and tannin added to compost and to soil on carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and ammonia volatilization. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 178:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kithome M, Paul JW, Bomke AA (1999) Reducing nitrogen losses during simulated composting of poultry manure using adsorbents or chemical amendments. J Environ Qual 28:194–201. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800010023x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici MM, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich KH (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pacholski A, Cai GX, Nieder R, Richter J, Fan XH, Zhu ZL, Roelcke M (2006) Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field—comparative measurements in Henan Province, China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 74:259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9003-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, Saikat D, Sarkar D (2015) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models R package version 31-122Google Scholar
- Rachhpalsingh, Nye PH (1986) A model of ammonia volatilization from applied urea. 2. Experimental testing. J Soil Sci 37:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1986.tb00003.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- RCoreTeam (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Sørensen P (1998) Carbon mineralization, nitrogen immobilization and pH change in soil after adding volatile fatty acids. Eur J Soil Sci 49:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4930457.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar