Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 423–437 | Cite as

Nanotechnologies for increasing the crop use efficiency of fertilizer-micronutrients

  • C. M. Monreal
  • M. DeRosa
  • S. C. Mallubhotla
  • P. S. Bindraban
  • C. Dimkpa


Billions of people and many soils across the planet suffer from micronutrient (MN) deficiencies impairing human health. In general, fertilization of deficient soils, according to soil test, with MNs alone and in combination with nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium (NPK) baseline treatment increases crop yield. The soil applied fertilizer-MN use efficiency (MUE) by crops is <5 % due to a lack of synchronization between the fertilizer-MN release and their crop demand during growth. Nanotechnology and biotechnology have the potential to play a prominent place in transforming agricultural systems and food production worldwide in the coming years. MNs added in microcapsules and nanocapsules, nanomaterials (NMs), and nanoparticles (NPs) are taken up and translocated within plants when grown to maturity, increasing crop yield and MN concentration in plants. Noteworthy, many of the effects of NPs and NMs on crop yield and quality, human health, and associated environmental risks remain to be explored. Increasing MUE requires synchronizing the release of nutrients from fertilizers with crop demand during the growing season. Development of intelligent MN fertilizer delivery platforms (IMNDP) may be possible on the basis of elucidating communication signals between plant roots and soil microorganisms. Important benefits from the development and farm adoption of intelligent MN delivery platforms include increased MUE, reduced fertilizer use, and minimal toxicity and environmental impacts. This article proposes for the first time a novel model for IMNDP to enhance MUE and food quality by enabling the synchronization of MN release from fertilizers according to crop demand.


Micronutrients Deficiency Crops Nanomaterials Nanoparticles Nanotechnology Biotechnology Intelligent nanofertilizer Nutrient delivery platform 


  1. Abedi-Koupai J, Varshosaz J, Mesforoosh M, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH (2012) Controlled release of fertilizer microcapsules using ethylene vinyl acetate polymer to enhance micronutrient deficiency and water use efficiency. J Plant Nutr 35:1130–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adhikary BH, Shrestha J, Baral BR (2010) Effects of micronutrients on growth and productivity of maize in acidic soil. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 1:8–15Google Scholar
  3. Adler FR (2011) Plant signalling: the opportunities and dangers of chemical communication. Biol Lett 7:161–162PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akhter S, Ahmad I, Ahmad MZ, Ramazani F, Singh A, Rahman Z, Ahmad FJ, Storm G, Kok RJ (2013) Nanomedicines as cancer therapeutics: current status. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 13:362–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alidoust D, Isoda A (2014) Phytotoxicity assessment of c-Fe2O3 nanoparticles on root elongation and growth of rice plant. Environ Earth Sci 71:5173–5182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alimohammadi M, Xu Y, Wang D, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV (2011) Physiological responses induced in tomato plants by a two-component nanostructural system composed of carbon nanotubes conjugated with quantum dots and its in vivo multimodal detection. Nanotechnol 22:295101–295108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alloway BJ (2008) Micronutrient deficiencies in global crop production. Springer Science and Business Media. UK, Reading, 354 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amiri ME, Fallahi E, Golchin A (2008) Influence of foliar and ground fertilization on yield, fruit quality, and soil, leaf, and fruit mineral nutrients in apple. J Plant Nutr 31:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Antisari LV, Laudicina VA, Gatti A, Carbone S, Badalucco L, Vianello G (2015) Soil microbial biomass carbon and fatty acid composition of earthworm Lumbricus rubellus after exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Biol Fertil Soils 51:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Antisari LV, Carbone S, Gatti A, Vianello G, Nannipieri P (2013) Toxicity of metal oxide (CeO2, Fe3O4, SnO2) engineered nanoparticles on soil microbial biomass and their distribution in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 60:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Atha DH, Wang H, Petersen EJ, Cleveland D, Holbrook RD, Jaruga P, Dizdaroglu M, Xing B, Nelson BC (2012) Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environ Sci Technol 46:1819–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bandyopadhyay S, Ghosh K, Varadachari C (2014) Multimicronutrient slow-release fertilizer of zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Article ID 327153. doi:10.1155/2014/327153. 7 p
  13. Bandyopadhyay S, Bhattacharya I, Ghosh K, Varadachari C (2008) New slow-releasing molybdenum fertilizer. J Agric Food Chem 56:1343–1349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bassler B (2002) Small talk: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell 109:421–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernal M, Casero D, Singh V, Grandon T, Wilson GT, Grande A, Yang H, Dodani SC, Pellegrini M, Huijser P, Connolly EL, Merchant SS, Krämer U (2012) Transcriptome sequencing identifies SPL7-regulated copper acquisition genes FRO4/FRO5 and the copper dependence of iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:738–761PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bingham FT, Garber MJ (1960) Solubility and availability of micronutrients in relation to phosphorus fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blackshaw RE, Hao X, Brandt RN, Clayton GW, Harker KN, O’Donovan JT, Johnson EN, Vera CL (2011) Canola response to ESN and urea in a four-year no-till cropping system. Agr J 103:92–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolle-Jones EW (1955) The interactions of iron and potassium in the potato plant. Plant Soil 6:129–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bouain N, Shahzad Z, Rouached A, Khan GA, Berthomieu P, Abdelly C, Poirier Y, Briat J-F, Curie C, Gaymard F (2007) Iron utilization and metabolism in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bunka DHJ, Stockley PG (2006) Aptamers come of age—at last. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:588–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2005) Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev 105:1025–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burke DJ, Zhu S, Pablico-Lansigan MP, Hewins CR, Samia ACS (2014) Titanium oxide nanoparticle effects on composition of soil microbial communities and plant performance. Biol Fertil Soils 50:1169–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cakmak I, Pfeiffer WH, McClafferty B (2010) Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc and iron. Cer Chem 87:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cakmak I (2008) Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 302:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Choi SJ, Decker EA, McClements DJ (2009) Impact of iron encapsulation within the interior aqueous phase of water-in-oil-in-water emulsions on lipid oxidation. Food Chem 116:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clemens S, Deinlein U, Ahmadi H, Höreth S, Uraguchi S (2013) Nicotianamine is a major player in plant Zn homeostasis. Biometals 26:623–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DeRosa M, Monreal CM, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y (2010) Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat Nanotech 5:91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Britt DW, Anderson AJ (2015a) Nano-CuO and interaction with nano-ZnO or soil bacterium provide evidence for the interference of nanoparticles in metal nutrition of plants. Ecotoxicol 24:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dimkpa CO, Hansen T, Stewart J, McLean JE, Britt DW, Anderson AJ (2015b) ZnO nanoparticles and root colonization by a beneficial pseudomonad influence metal responses in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Nanotoxicol 9:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dimkpa CO (2014) Can nanotechnology deliver the promised benefits without negatively impacting soil microbial life? J Basic Microb 54:889–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dimkpa CO, Latta DE, McLean JE, Britt DW, Boyanov MI, Anderson AJ (2013) Fate of CuO and ZnO nano- and microparticles in the plant environment. Env Sci Technol 47:4734–4742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Latta DE, Manangón E, Britt DW, Johnson WP, Boyanov MI, Anderson A (2012a) CuO and ZnO nanoparticles: phytotoxicity, metal speciation and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat. J Nanopart Res 14:1125–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Britt DW, Anderson AJ (2012b) Bioactivity and biomodification of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles with relevance to plant performance in agriculture. Industr Biotechnol 8:344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. El-Kereti MA, El-Feky SA, Khater MS, Osman YA, El-sherbini EA (2013) ZnO nanofertilizer and He Ne laser irradiation for promoting growth and yield of sweet basil. Recent Pat Food Nutrit 5:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fageria VD (2001) Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr 24:1269–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferrandon M, Chamel AR (1988) Cuticular retention, foliar absorption and translocation of Fe, Mn and Zn supplied in organic and inorganic form. J Plant Nutr 11:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gardea-Torresdey JL, Rico CM, White JC (2014) Trophic transfer, transformation, and impact of engineered nanomaterials in terrestrial environments. Envir Sci Technol 48:2526–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ghafariyan MH, Malakouti MJ, Dadpour MR, Stroeve P, Mahmoudi M (2013) Effects of magnetite nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Env Sci Technol 47:10645–10652Google Scholar
  39. Goh EB, Yim G, Tsui W, McClure J, Surette MG, Davies J (2002) Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99:17025–17030PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. González ME, Cea M, Medina J, González A, Diez MC, Cartes P, Monreal C, Navia R (2015) Evaluation of biodegradable polymers as encapsulating agents for the development of a urea controlled release fertilizer using biochar as support material. Sci Tot Envir 505:446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grotz N, Guerinot ML (2006) Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:595–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hawkesford MJ (2014) Reducing the reliance on nitrogen fertilizer for wheat production. Cer Sci Food Secur Nutrit Sustain 59:276–283Google Scholar
  43. Han J, Guenier AS, Salmieri S, Lacroix M (2008) Alginate and chitosan functionalization for micronutrient encapsulation. J Agric Food Chem 56:2528–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hossain K-Z, Monreal CM, Sayari A (2008) Adsorption of urease on PE-MCM-41 and its catalytic effect on hydrolysis of urea. Coll Surf B: Biointerfaces 62:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huo C, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) CuO nanoparticles encapsulated inside Al-MCM-41 mesoporous materials via direct synthetic route. Sci Rep 4:3682 (1–9)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Imtiaz M, Rashid A, Khan P, Memon MY, Aslam M (2010) The role of micronutrients in crop production and human health. Pak J Bot 42:2565–2578Google Scholar
  47. International Rice Research Institute – IRRI (1999) Program report for 1998. Los Baños, Philippines, 188 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaiser D (2011) Are micronutrients needed in high yield environments? University of Minnesota Extension. (
  49. Keuskamp DH, Kimber R, Bindraban P, Dimkpa C, Schenkeveld WDC (2015) Plant exudates for nutrient uptake. VFRC Report 2015/4. Virtual Fertilizer Research Center, Washington, D.C. 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Khodakovskaya MV, de Silva K, Nedosekin DA, Dervishi E, Biris AS, Shashkov EV, Galanzha EI, Zharov VP (2011) Complex genetic, photothermal, and photoacoustic analysis of nanoparticle-plant interactions. PNAS 108:1028–1033PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li ZR, Watanabe F, Biris AS (2009) Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano 3:3221–3227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Khosroyar S, Akbarzade A, Arjoman M, Safekordil AA, Mortazavi SA (2012) Ferric saccharate capsulation with alginate coating using emulsification method. Afr J Microb Res 6:2455–2461Google Scholar
  53. Kim JH, Lee Y, Kim EJ, Gu S, Sohn EJ, Seo YS, An HJ, Chang YS (2014) Exposure of iron nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana enhances root elongation by triggering cell wall loosening. Environ Sci Technol 48:3477–3485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim S, Lee S, Lee I (2012) Alteration of phytotoxicity and oxidant stress potential by metal oxide nanoparticles in Cucumis sativus. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2799–2806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim SA, Guerinot ML (2007) Mining iron: iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett 581:2273–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012) Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 63:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee S, Chiecko JC, Kim SA, Walker EL, Lee Y, Guerinot ML, An G (2009) Disruption of OsYSL15 leads to iron inefficiency in rice plants. Plant Physiol 150:786–800PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiates) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar tests for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Envir Toxicol Chem 27:1915–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin S, Reppert J, Hu Q, Hudson J, Reid M, Ratnikova T, Rao A, Luo H, Ke P (2009) Uptake, translocation, and transmission of carbon nanomaterials in rice plants. Small 5:1128–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lin DH, Xing B (2008) Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42:5580–5585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lin DH, Xing B (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Envir Pollut 150:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Liu R, Lal R (2015) Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci Total Envir 514:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liu P, Huang Q, Chen W (2012a) Construction and application of a zinc-specific biosensor for assessing the immobilization and bioavailability of zinc in different soils. Envir Pollut 164:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu G, Hanlon E, Li Y (2012b) Understanding and applying chelated fertilizers effectively based on soil pH. Horticultural Sciences Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida (, accessed November 2014).
  65. Liu QL, Chen B, Wang QL, Shi XL, Xiao ZY, Lin JX, Fang XH (2009) Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett 9:1007–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Loneragan JF, Grove TS, Robson DR, Snowball K (1979) Phosphorus toxicity as a factor in zinc-phosphorus interactions in plants. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ma X, Geisler-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A (2010) Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ 408:3053–3061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maderova L, Paton GI (2013) Deployment of microbial sensors to assess zinc bioavailability and toxicity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 66:222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Malakouti MJ (2008) The effect of micronutrients in ensuring efficient use of macronutrients. Turk J Agric For 32:215–220Google Scholar
  70. Malakouti MJ (2000) Balanced nutrition of wheat: an approach towards self-sufficiency and enhancement of national health. A compilation of papers, Ministry of Agriculture, Karaj, Iran, 544 pGoogle Scholar
  71. Marschner H (2012) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, 889 pGoogle Scholar
  72. Martineau N, McLean JE, Dimkpa CO, Britt DW, Anderson AJ (2014) Components from wheat roots modify the bioactivity of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles in a soil bacterium. Envir Poll 187:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mastronardi E, Tsae P, Zhang X, Monreal C, DeRosa MC (2015) Strategic role of nanotechnology in fertilizers: potential and limitations. In: Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N (eds) Emerging nanotechnologies in agriculture. Verlag, New York, NY, pp 25–68Google Scholar
  74. Milner MJ, Seamon J, Craft E, Kochian LV (2013) Transport properties of members of the ZIP family in plants and their role in Zn and Mn homeostasis. J Exp Bot 64:369–381PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Miralles P, Church TL, Harris AT (2012a) Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Envir Sci Technol 46:9224–9239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Miralles P, Johnson E, Church TL, Harris AT (2012b) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes in alfalfa and wheat: toxicology and uptake. J R Soc Interface 9:3514–3527PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moghaddasi S, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH, Karimzadeh F, Chaney RL (2013) Preparation of nano-particles from waste tire rubber and evaluation of their effectiveness as zinc source for cucumber in nutrient solution culture. Scient Hortic 160:398–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Monreal CM (2015) The chemistry of labile organic matter in soil solution: I. A model for metabolites of chemical signaling pathways associated with plant-microbial interactions. In: He Z, Wu F (eds) Labile organic matter— chemical compositions, function, and significance in soil and the environment. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer, Madison, WI. doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub62.2014.0073, Chapter 9Google Scholar
  79. Monreal CM, Schnitzer M (2015) Labile organic matter in soil solution: II. Separation and identification of metabolites from plant-microbial communication in soil solutions of wheat rhizospheres. In: He Z, Wu F (eds) Labile organic matter—compositions, function, and significance in soil and the environment. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer, Madison, WI. doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub62.2014.0074, Chapter 10Google Scholar
  80. Monreal CM, Schnitzer M (2013) The chemistry and biochemistry of organic components in the soil solutions of wheat rhizosphere. Adv Agron 121:179–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Moslemy M, Hosseini H, Erfan M, Mortazavian AM, Fard RMN, Neyestani TR, Komeyli R (2014) Characterisation of spray-dried microparticles containing iron coated by pectin/resistant starch. Int J Food Sci Technol 49:1736–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Murphy LS, Ellis JR, Adriano DC (1981) Phosphorus-micronutrient interaction effects on crop production. J Plant Nutr 3:593–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nair PMG, Chung I (2014) Impact of copper oxide nanoparticles exposure on Arabidopsis thaliana growth, root system development, root lignification, and molecular level changes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12709–12722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL, Wang H, Tang CX, Zhang YS (2012) Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Ann Bot 112:391–408PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ockenden I, Dorsch JA, Reid MM, Lin L, Grant LK, Raboy V, Lott JNA (2004) Characterization of the storage of phosphorus, inositol phosphate and cations in grain tissues of four barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) low phytic acid genotypes. Plant Sci 167:1131–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ostwald W (1897) Studien über die bildung und umwandlung fester Körper. Zeitschr Physikal Chemie 22:289–330Google Scholar
  87. Ozturk L, Yazici A, Eker S, Gokmen O, Rmheld V, Cakmak I (2008) Glyphosate inhibition of ferric reductase activity in iron deficient sunflower roots. New Phytol 177:899–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pan B, Xing B (2012) Applications and implications of manufactured nanoparticles in soils: a review. Eur J Soil Sci 63:437–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pandey AC, Sanjay SS, Yadav RS (2010) Application of ZnO nanoparticles in influencing the growth rate of Cicer arietinum. J Exper Nanosci 5:488–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Peng M, Hudson D, Schofield A, Tsao R, Yang R, Gu H, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ (2008) Adaptation of Arabidopsis to nitrogen limitation involves induction of anthocyanin synthesis which is controlled by the NLA gene. J Exp Bot 59:2933–2944PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pii Y, Mimmo T, Tomasi N, Terzano R, Cesco S, Crecchio C (2015) Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere: beneficial influences of plant-growth-promoting bacteria on nutrient acquisition process. A review Biol Fertil Soils 51:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pittman J (2005) Managing the manganese: molecular mechanisms of manganese transport and homeostasis. New Phytol 167:733–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pokhrel LR (2013) Evaluation of colloidal stability and ecotoxicity of metal-based nanoparticles in the aquatic and terrestrial systems. Ph.D. Thesis, East Tennessee State University. p 205Google Scholar
  94. Pokhrel LR, Dubey B (2013) Evaluation of developmental responses of two crop plants exposed to silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Sci Total Envir 452–453:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pradhan S, Patra P, Mitra S, Dey KK, Jain S, Sarkar S, Roy S, Palit P, Goswami A (2014) Manganese nanoparticles: impact on non-nodulated plant as a potent enhancer in nitrogen metabolism and toxicity study both in vivo and in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 62:8777–8785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pradhan S, Patra P, Das S, Chandra S, Mitra S, Dey KK, Akbar S, Palit P, Goswami A (2013) Photochemical modulation of biosafe manganese nanoparticles on Vigna radiata: a detailed molecular, biochemical, and biophysical study. Environ Sci Technol 47:13122–13131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Prasad TNVKV, Sudhakar P, Sreenivasulu Y, Latha P, Munaswamya V, Reddy RK, Sreeprasad TS, Sajanlal PR, Pradeep T (2012) Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of peanut. J Plant Nutr 35:905–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agric Res 2:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ramani S, Kannan S (1974) Effects of certain cations on manganese absorption by excised rice roots. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 5:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Reich M, Aghajanzadeh T, De Kok LJ (2014) Physiological basis of plant nutrient use efficiency—concepts, opportunities and challenges for its improvement. In: Hawkesford MJ, De Kok LJ (eds) Nutrient use efficiency in plants: concepts and approaches. Plant Ecophysiology. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  101. Rengel Z, Batten GD, Crowley DE (1999) Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crop Res 60:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rico CM, Majumdar S, Duarte-Gardea M, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Interactions of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J Agric Food Chem 59:3485–3498PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rocha-Santos TAP (2014) Sensors and biosensors based on magnetic nanoparticles. Trends Anal Chem 62:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Roshan NM, Azarpour E, Moradi M (2011) Study effects of different nitrogen and micronutrients fertilizers rates on yield and yield components of rice. World Appl Sci J 13:419–423Google Scholar
  105. Ryan J, Rashid A, Torrent J, Yau SK, Ibrikci H, Sommer R, Ereneglu EB (2013) Micronutrient constraints to crop production in the Middle East–West Asia region: significance, research, and management. Adv Agron 122:1–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sailor MJ, Park JH (2012) Hybrid nanoparticles for detection and treatment of cancer. Adv Mater 24:3779–3802PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Samra JS, Benbi DK, Brar MS, Bansal, S (2006) Declining factor productivity and sustainability of crop production, Ith edn, Balanced fertilization for sustaining crop productivity. Proceed. Inter. Symposium, 22–25 Nov. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, pp 21–56, Int. Potash Inst., Horgen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  108. Sarkar AN, Wynjones RG (1982) Effect of rhizosphere pH on the availability and uptake of Fe, Mn and Zn. Plant Soil 66:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Seneff S, Swanson N, Li C (2015) Aluminum and glyphosate can synergistically induce pineal gland pathology: connection to gut dysbiosis and neurological disease. Agric Sci 6:42–70Google Scholar
  110. Servin A, Elmer W, Mukherjee A, De la Torre-Roche R, Hamdi H, White JC, Bindraban P, Dimkpa C (2015) A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant diseases and enhance crop yield. J Nano Part Res 17:92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shao Y, Wang J, Wu H, Liu JL, Aksay IA, Lina Y (2010) Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 22:1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Shi J, Abid AD, Kennedy IM, Hristova KR, Silk WK (2011) To duckweeds (Landoltia punctata), nanoparticulate copper oxide is more inhibitory than the soluble copper in the bulk solution. Environ Pollut 159:1277–1282PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Shukla UC, Mukhi AK (1980) Ameliorative role of Zn, K, and gypsum on maize growth under alkali soil conditions. Am Soc Agron 72:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Singh NB, Amist N, Yadav K, Singh D, Pandey JK, Singh SC (2013) Zinc oxide nanoparticles as fertilizer for the germination, growth and metabolism of vegetable crops. J Nanoeng Nanoman 3:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Singh JP, Karamanos RE, Stewart JWB (1987) The zinc fertility of Saskatchewan soils. Can J Soil Sci 67:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Singh MV (2008) Micronutrient deficiencies in crops and soils in India. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Micronutrients deficiencies in global crop production, 4th edn. Springer Science and Business Media. Reading, UK, pp 93–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Smith D (1975) Effect of potassium topdressing a low fertility silt loam soil on alfalfa herbage yields and composition and soil potassium values. Agr J 67:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Soliman AS, El-feky SA, Darwish E (2015) Alleviation of salt stress on Moringa peregrina using foliar application of nanofertilizers. J Hortic For 7:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Srivastava PC, Bhatt M, Pachauri SP, Tyagi AK (2014) Effect of zinc application methods on apparent utilization efficiency of zinc and phosphorus fertilizers under basmati rice-wheat rotation. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stampoulis D, Saion K, Sinha SK, White JC (2009) Assay-dependent phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants. Environ Sci Technol 43:9473–9479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sultan Y, DeRosa MC (2011) Target binding influences permeability in aptamer-polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Small 7:1219–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sultan Y, Walsh R, Monreal C, DeRosa MC (2009) Preparation of functional aptamer films using layer-by-layer self-assembly. Biomacromolec 10:1149–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Swaminathan S, Edwards BS, Kurpad AV (2013) Micronutrient deficiency and cognitive and physical performance in Indian children. Eur J Clin Nutrit 67:467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Teare ID, Peterson CJ, Law AG (1971) Size and frequency of leaf stomata in cultivars of Triticum aestivum and other Triticum species. Crop Sci 11:496–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tomalia DA, Reyna LA, Svenson S (2007) Dendrimers as multi-purpose nanodevices for oncology drug delivery and diagnostic imaging. Biochem Soc Trans Cell Deliv Therap Macromol 35:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Unrine JM, Shoults-Wilson WA, Zhurbich O, Bertsch PM, Tsyusko V (2012) Trophic transfer of Au nanoparticles from soil along simulated terrestrial food chain. Envir Sci Technol 46:9753–9760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Verma TS, Minhas RS (1987) Zinc and phosphorus interaction in a wheat- maize cropping system. Fertil Res 13:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Vo-Dinh T, Kasili P, Wabuyele M (2006) Nanoprobes and nanobiosensors for monitoring and imaging individual living cells. Nanomedic 2:22–30Google Scholar
  129. Wang P, Menzies NW, Lombi E, McKenna BA, Johannessen B, Glover CJ, Kappen P, Kopittke PM (2013) Fate of ZnO nanoparticles in soils and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ Sci Technol 47:13822–13830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wang Z, Xie X, Zhao J, Liu X, Feng W, White JC, Xing B (2012) Xylem- and phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize (Zea mays L.). Environ Sci Technol l46:4434–4441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Warne MS, Heemsbergen D, Stevens D, McLaughlin M, Cozens G, Whatmuff M, Broos K, Barry G, Bell M, Nash D, Pritchard D, Penney N (2008) Modeling the toxicity of copper and zinc salts to wheat in 14 soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:786–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Waters BM, Sankaran RP (2011) Moving micronutrients from the soil to the seeds: gene and physiological processes from a biofortification perspective. Plant Sci 180:562–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Watson J-L, Fang T, Dimkpa CO, Britt DW, McLean JE, Jacobson A, Anderson AJ (2015) The phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles on wheat varies with soil properties. Biometals 28:101–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wild E, Jones KC (2009) Novel method for the direct visualization of in vivo nanomaterials and chemical interactions in plants. Environ Sci Technol 43:5290–5294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Witzany G (2010) Biocommunication and natural genome editing. Springer, New York, USA, p 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. World Health Organization - WHO (2009) Global health risks. Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Switzerland, Geneva, 60 pGoogle Scholar
  137. Wu ZY, Wang HJ, Zhuang TT, Sun LB, Wang YM, Zhu J (2008) Multiple functionalization of mesoporous silica in one-pot: direct synthesis of aluminum-containing plugged SBA-15 from aqueous nitrate solutions. Adv Funct Mater 18:82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Xu Y, Wu Z, Zhang L, Lu H, Yang P, Webley PA, Dongyuan Z (2009) Highly specific enrichment of glycopeptides using boronic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica. Anal Chem 81:503–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Yang HM, Deng Y, Du C, Jin S (2010a) Novel synthesis of ordered mesoporous materials Al-MCM-41 from bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 47:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yang HM, Tang AD, Ouyang J, Mann S (2010b) From natural attapulgite to mesoporous materials: methodology, characterization and structural evolution. J Phys Chem B 114:2390–2398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Yang F, Liu C, Gao F, Su M, Wu X, Zheng I, Hong F, Yang P (2007) The improvement of spinach growth by nano-anatase TiO2 treatment is related to nitrogen photoreduction. Biol Trace Elem Res 119:77–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yim G, Wang HH, Davies J (2007) Antibiotics as signalling molecules. Philos Trans R Soc London B 362:1195–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Yuvaraj M, Subramanian KS (2014) Controlled release fertilizer of zinc encapsulated by a manganese hollow core shell. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2014:1–8Google Scholar
  144. Zebarth BJ, Warren CJ, Sheard RW (1992) Influence of the rate of nitrogen fertilization on the mineral content of winter wheat in Ontario. J Agric Food Chem 40:1528–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zhang X, Chabot D, Sultan Y, Monreal C, DeRosa MC (2013) Target-molecule-triggered rupture of aptamer-encapsulated polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Appl Mater Interf 5:5500–5507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zhao L, Sun Y, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Servin AD, Hong J, Niu G, Peralta-Videa JR, Duarte-Gardea M, Gardea- Torresdey JL (2013) Influence of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on cucumber physiological markers and bioaccumulation of Ce and Zn: a life cycle study. J Agric Food Chem 61:11945–11951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zhu H, Han J, Xiao JQ, Jin Y (2008) Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J Environ Monit 10:713–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by: Marc Savard 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Monreal
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. DeRosa
    • 3
  • S. C. Mallubhotla
    • 4
  • P. S. Bindraban
    • 5
  • C. Dimkpa
    • 5
  1. 1.Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research CenterOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  4. 4.OttawaCanada
  5. 5.Virtual Fertilizer Research Center, NWWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations