Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposition of aboveground and root litter for three desert herbs: mass loss and dynamics of mineral nutrients

Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Litter decomposition is an important process in terrestrial C and N cycling, but it is still unclear which factors are controlling litter decomposition and nutrient release in arid and semiarid environments. Litterbag experiment was carried out to evaluate the mass loss and nutrient dynamics of aboveground and belowground litter of three desert plants with different life form (ephemeral herbs and perennials). The decomposition rates of Erodium oxyrrhynchum and Eremurus inderiensis (ephemeral herbs) were faster than that of Seriphidium santolinum (perennial) after 2 years. The content of neutral soluble detergent positively correlated with mass loss and was responsible for the faster rates in the primary decomposition phase. Additionally, differences in mass loss and N release between aboveground and belowground litter depended on litter type. Decomposition of the aboveground litter was mainly affected by initial nutrient content and C component of litter, whereas root decomposition was primarily determined by the content of recalcitrant compounds of litter. Only stem generally exhibited N accumulation, whereas there was no relationship between the initial N content and net N immobilization during decomposition of leaf and root litter. Our results suggest that the decomposition rate and nutrient release in temperate desert are closely linked to initial nutrients and C contents of litters, and decomposition of desert litters depended on plant life form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abiven S, Recous S, Reyes V, Oliver R (2005) Mineralisation of C and N from root, stem and leaf residues in soil and role of their biochemical quality. Biol Fertil Soils 42:119–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Ballaré CL (2010) Dual role of lignin in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:4618–4622

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin AT, Vivanco L (2006) Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, McClaugherty C (2008) Plant litter. decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, Berlin, pp 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LA, King JY, Milchunas DG (2007) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 13:2193–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 1085–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro H, Fortunel C, Freitas H (2010) Effects of land abandonment on plant litter decomposition in a Montado system: relation to litter chemistry and community functional parameters. Plant Soil 333:181–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda-Pizarro JG, Whitford WG (1990) Decomposition patterns of surface leaf litter of six plant species along a Chihuahuan Desert watershed. Am Midl Nat 123:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YN, Wang Q, Li WH, Ruan X (2007) Microbiotic crusts and their interrelations with environmental factors in the Gurbantonggut desert, western China. Environ Geol 52:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BM, Wang GX, Peng SL (2009) Role of desert annuals in nutrient flow in arid area of Northwestern China: a nutrient reservoir and provider. Plant Ecol 201:401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright LJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, Denef K, Paul E (2013) The Microbial Efficiency Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Chang Biol 19:988–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and liter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack DF, Chou WW, Yang WH, Harmon ME, Silver WL (2009) Controls on long-term root and leaf litter decomposition in neotropical forests. Glob Chang Biol 15:1339–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrepaal E, Cornelissen JH, Aerts R, Wallén B, Van Logtestijn RS (2005) Are growth forms consistent predictors of leaf litter quality and decomposability across peatlands along a latitudinal gradient? J Ecol 93:817–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornara DA, Tilman D, Hobbie SE (2009) Linkages between plant functional composition, fine root processes and potential soil N mineralization rates. J Ecol 97:48–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frey S, Elliott E, Paustian K, Peterson G (2000) Fungal translocation as a mechanism for soil nitrogen inputs to surface residue decomposition in a no-tillage agroecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 32:689–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii S, Takeda H (2010) Dominant effects of litter substrate quality on the difference between leaf and root decomposition process above-and belowground. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2224–2230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gholz HL, Wedin DA, Smitherman SM, Harmon ME, Parton WJ (2000) Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Glob Chang Biol 6:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Nadelhoffer KJ, Blair JM (1999) Analysis of detritus and organic horizons for mineral and organic constituents. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 869–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JF (1991) Climate in Xinjiang. Meteorol Press, Beijing, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Jackson RB, Trofymow JA, Porporato A (2008) The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321:684–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Yrízar A, Núñez S, Búrquez A (2007) Leaf litter decomposition in a southern Sonoran Desert ecosystem, northwestern Mexico: Effects of habitat and litter quality. Acta Oecol 32:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KL, Klopatek JM, Klopatek CC (1998) The effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition along an elevational gradient. Ecol Appl 8:1061–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 961–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adar EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC, Fasth B (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Vendramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A (2000) Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil 218:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott C (1995) Does nitrogen availability control rates of litter decomposition in forests? Plant Soil 168–169:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quested H, Eriksson O, Fortunel C, Garnier E (2007) Plant traits relate to whole-community litter quality and decomposition following land use change. Funct Ecol 21:1016–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:13730–13734

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt T, Parton W, Ojima D (1992) Mass loss and nitrogen dynamics of decaying litter of grasslands: the apparent low nitrogen immobilization potential of root detritus. Can J Bot 70:384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber J, Seeber GUH, Langel R, Scheu S, Meyer E (2008) The effect of macro-invertebrates and plant litter of different quality on the release of N from litter to plant on alpine pastureland. Biol Fertil Soils 44:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi A, Penfold C, Marschner P (2013) Decomposition of roots and shoots of perennial grasses and annual barley–separately or in two residue mixes. Biol Fertil Soils 49:673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Prescott C, Parsons W, Parkinson D (1991) Substrate control of litter decomposition in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J Bot 69:2242–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilston EL, Halpin C, Hopkins DW (2013) Decomposition of tobacco roots with modified phenylpropanoid content by fungi with contrasting lignocellulose degradation strategies. Biol Fertil Soils 49:305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi SK, Sumida A, Shibata H, Ono K, Uemura S, Kodama Y, Hara T (2006) Leaf litterfall and decomposition of different above- and belowground parts of birch (Betula ermanii) trees and dwarf bamboo (Sasa kurilensis) shrubs in a young secondary forest in Northern Japan. Biol Fertil Soils 43:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uselman SM, Snyder KA, Blank RR, Jones TJ (2011) UVB exposure does not accelerate rates of litter decomposition in a semi-arid riparian ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1254–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1967) Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J Anim Sci 26:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco L, Austin AT (2006) Intrinsic effects of species on leaf litter and root decomposition: a comparison of temperate grasses from North and South America. Oecologia 150:97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco L, Austin AT (2008) Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interactions in Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol 96:727–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XQ, Jiang J, Lei JQ, Zhang WM, Qian YB (2003) The distribution of ephemeral vegetation on the longitudinal dune surface and its stabilization significance in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Acta Geograph Sin 58:598–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherly HE, Zitzer SF, Coleman JS, Arnone JA (2003) In situ litter decomposition and litter quality in a Mojave Desert ecosystem: effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and interannual climate variability. Glob Chang Biol 9:1223–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Reich P, Westoby M (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct Ecol 15:423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DQ, Hui DF, Luo YQ, Zhou GY (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of China (XDA05050405) and the Western Light Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XBBS201007). We would like to thank Zhongdong Lan, Qing Lu, and Li Zhou for their help in the chemical analysis. We also wish to thank the staff of the Fukang Station of Desert Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Huang, G., Ma, J. et al. Decomposition of aboveground and root litter for three desert herbs: mass loss and dynamics of mineral nutrients. Biol Fertil Soils 50, 745–753 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0892-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0892-5

Keywords

Navigation