Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon mineralization in saline soils as affected by residue composition and water potential

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 April 2013

Abstract

In saline soils under semi-arid climate, low matric and osmotic potential are the main stressors for microbes. But little is known about the impact of water potential (sum of matric and osmotic potential) and substrate composition on microbial activity and biomass in field collected saline soils. Three sandy loam soils with electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe) 3.8, 11 and 21 dS m−1 (hereafter referred to EC3.8, EC11 and EC21) were kept at optimal water content for 14 days. After this pre-incubation, the soils were either left at optimal water content or dried to achieve water potentials of −2.33, −2.82, −3.04 and −4.04 MPa. Then, the soils were amended with 20 g kg−1 pea or wheat residue to increase nutrient supply. Carbon dioxide emission was measured over 14 days; microbial biomass C was measured at the end of the experiment. Cumulative respiration decreased with decreasing water potential and was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in soils at water potential −4 MPa than in soils at optimal water content. The effect of residue type on the response of cumulative respiration was inconsistent; with residue type having no effect in the saline soils (EC11 and EC21) whereas in the non-saline soil (EC3.8), the decrease in respiration with decreasing water potential was less with wheat than with pea residue. At a given water potential, the absolute and relative (in percentage of optimal water content) cumulative respiration was lower in the saline soils than in the non-saline soil. This can be explained by the lower osmotic potential and the smaller microbial biomass in the saline soils. However, even at a similar osmotic potential, cumulative respiration was higher in the non-saline soil. It can be concluded that high salt concentrations in the soil solution strongly reduce microbial activity even if the water content is relatively high. The stronger relative decrease in microbial activity in the saline soils at a given osmotic potential compared to the non-saline soil suggests that the small biomass in saline soils is less able to tolerate low osmotic potential. Hence, drying of soil will have a stronger negative effect on microbial activity in saline than in non-saline soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: A handbook of methods, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Askri B, Bouhlila R, Job J (2010) Development and application of a conceptual hydrologic model to predict soil salinity within modern Tunisian oases. J Hydrol 380:45–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beales N (2004) Adaptation of microorganisms to cold temperatures, weak acid preservatives, low pH, and osmotic stress: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 3:1–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury N, Marschner P, Burns R (2011) Response of microbial activity and community structure to decreasing soil osmotic and matric potential. Plant Soil 344:241–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers T, Yeo A (1995) Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next? Funct Plant Biol 22:875–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari M, Abbate C, La Porta V, Baglieri A, Cignetti A (2007) Microbial response to Na2SO4 additions in a volcanic soil. Arid Land Res Manage 21:211–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O'Donnell AG, Bailey MJ (2003) Physiological and community responses of established grassland bacterial populations to water stress. Appl Environ Microb 69:6961–6968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gros R, Poly F, Jocteur Monrozier L, Faivre P (2003) Plant and soil microbial community responses to solid waste leachates diffusion on grassland. Plant Soil 255:445–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann M (2011) Molecular biology of cyanobacterial salt acclimation. FEMS Microb Rev 35:87–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heal O, Anderson J, Swift M (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: A historical overview. In: Cadisch G, Giller K (eds) In driven by nature: Plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International Wallingford, Oxford, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Song C (2010) Effects of land use on soil water soluble organic C and microbial biomass C concentrations in the Sanjiang Plain in northeast China. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Sec B–Soil Plant Sci 60:182–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ilstedt U, Nordgren A, Malmer A (2000) Optimum soil water for soil respiration before and after amendment with glucose in humid tropical acrisols and a boreal mor layer. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1591–1599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A 1986 Water retention: laboratory methods. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. In: A Klute (ed). Soil science society of America, Madison, WI, pp 635–662

  • Li XG, Shi XM, Wang DJ, Zhou W (2012) Effect of alkalized magnesic salinity on soil respiration changes with substrate availability and incubation time. Biol Fertil Soils DOI 10.1007/s00374-011-0654-1: 1-6

  • Mafongoya PL, Giller KE, Palm CA (1998) Decomposition and nitrogen release patterns of tree prunings and litter. Agroforest Syst 38:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P (2012) Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Beltran J, Manzur CL 2005 Overview of salinity problems in the world and FAO strategies to address the problem. Proceedings of the International Salinity Forum, Riverside, California, pp 311-313

  • Moyano F, Vasilyeva N, Bouckaert L, Cook F, Craine J, Curiel Yuste J, Don A, Epron D, Formanek P, Franzluebbers A (2011) The moisture response of soil heterotrophic respiration: interaction with soil properties. BGeo Discuss 8:11577–11599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren A (2001) The bioenergetic basis for the decrease in metabolic diversity at increasing salt concentrations: implications for the functioning of salt lake ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 466:61–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards L (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural Handbook No. 60. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardinha M, Müller T, Schmeisky H, Joergensen RG (2003) Microbial performance in soils along a salinity gradient under acidic conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 23:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setia R, Marschner P, Baldock J, Chittleborough D (2010) Is CO2 evolution in saline soils affected by an osmotic effect and calcium carbonate? Biol Fertil Soils 46:781–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setia R, Marschner P, Baldock J, Chittleborough D, Smith P, Smith J (2011a) Salinity effects on carbon mineralization in soils of varying texture. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1908–1916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setia R, Marschner P, Baldock J, Chittleborough D, Verma V (2011b) Relationships between carbon dioxide emission and soil properties in salt-affected landscapes. Soil Biol Biochem 43:667–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setia R, Setia D, Marschner P (2012) Short-term carbon mineralization in saline-sodic soils. Biol Fertil Soils 48:475–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R, Hughes K, Thorburn P, Dowling A 1987 Principles of landscape, soil and water salinity—processes and management options. Part A. In:‘Landscape, soil and water salinity‘. Proceedings of the Brisbane regional salinity workshop. In Queensland Department of Primary Industries Conference and Workshop Series QC8700, Brisbane

  • Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Bentz B, Lineres M, Cheneby D, Nicolardot B (2000) Biochemical quality of crop residues and carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics under non-limiting nitrogen conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:918–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida Y, Clough TJ, Kelliher FM, Sherlock RR (2010) Soil microbial respiration responses to changing temperature and substrate availability in fertile grassland. Soil Res 48:395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bruggen A, Semenov A (2000) In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Appl Soil Ecol 15:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance E, Brookes P, Jenkinson D (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WJ, Baldock JA, Dalal RC, Moody PW (2004) Decomposition of plant materials in relation to nitrogen availability and biochemistry determined by NMR and wet-chemical analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 36:2045–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wichern J, Wichern F, Joergensen RG (2006) Impact of salinity on soil microbial communities and the decomposition of maize in acidic soils. Geoderma 137:100–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Setia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Setia, R., Marschner, P. Carbon mineralization in saline soils as affected by residue composition and water potential. Biol Fertil Soils 49, 71–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0698-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0698-x

Keywords

Navigation