Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 350–357 | Cite as

Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria and soil compaction on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, soil properties and rhizosphere microflora

  • Mustafa Y. CanbolatEmail author
  • Serdar Bilen
  • Ramazan Çakmakçı
  • Fikrettin Şahin
  • Adil Aydın
Original Paper


Inoculants are of great importance in sustainable and/or organic agriculture. In the present study, plant growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare) has been studied in sterile soil inoculated with four plant growth-promoting bacteria and mineral fertilizers at three different soil bulk densities and in three harvests of plants. Three bacterial species were isolated from the rhizosphere of barley and wheat. These bacteria fixed N2, dissolved P and significantly increased growth of barley seedlings. Available phosphate in soil was significantly increased by seed inoculation of Bacillus M-13 and Bacillus RC01. Total culturable bacteria, fungi and P-solubilizing bacteria count increased with time. Data suggest that seed inoculation of barley with Bacillus RC01, Bacillus RC02, Bacillus RC03 and Bacillus M-13 increased root weight by 16.7, 12.5, 8.9 and 12.5% as compared to the control (without bacteria inoculation and mineral fertilizers) and shoot weight by 34.7, 34.7, 28.6 and 32.7%, respectively. Bacterial inoculation gave increases of 20.3–25.7% over the control as compared with 18.9 and 35.1% total biomass weight increases by P and NP application. The concentration of N and P in soil was decreased by increasing soil compaction. In contrast to macronutrients, the concentration of Fe, Cu and Mn was lower in plants grown in the loosest soil. Soil compaction induced a limitation in root and shoot growth that was reflected by a decrease in the microbial population and activity. Our results show that bacterial population was stimulated by the decrease in soil bulk density. The results suggest that the N2-fixing and P-solubilizing bacterial strains tested have a potential on plant growth activity of barley.


Plant growth promoting bacteria Phosphate solubilization Bacillus spp. Soil compaction 



This study was supported by The Turkish Academy of Sciences- TUBA- GEBIP programme.


  1. Amer GA, Utkheda RS (2000) Development of formulations of biological agents for management of root rot of lettuce and cucumber. Can J Microbiol 46:809–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. In: Helrich K (ed) Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Inc., vol 1, 15th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Badalucco L, Kuikman PJ (2001) Mineralization and immobilization in the rhizosphere. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (eds) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil–plant interface. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 159–196Google Scholar
  4. Bashan Y (1998) Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 16:729–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1225–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, Holguin G, de-Bashan LE (2004) Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances. Can J Microbiol 50:521–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand H, Nalin R, Bally R, Cleyet-Marel JC (2001) Isolation and identification of the most efficient plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with canola (Brassica napus). Biol Fertil Soils 33:152–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 363–375Google Scholar
  9. Carrillo AE, Li CY, Bashan Y (2002) Increased acidification in the rhizosphere of cactus seedlings induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Naturwissenschaften 89:428–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. De Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 24:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deubel A, Gransee A, Merbach W (2000) Transformation of organic rhizodepositions by rhizosphere bacteria and its influence on the availability of tertiary calcium phosphate. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Ptacek D, Okon Y, Vanderleyden J (2002) Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum brasilense and A. irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake of spring wheat and grain maize. Biol Fertil Soils 36:284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell RE, Walley FL, Lukey AP, Germida JJ (1993) Manual and digital line-intercept methods for measuring root length: a comparison. Agron J 85:1233–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS (2002) Bailey and Scott's diagnostic microbiology, 11th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Glick BR, Bashan Y (1997) Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of phytopathogens. Biotechnol Adv 15:353–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groleau-Renaud V, Plantureux S, Guckert A (1998) Influence of plant morphology on root exudation of maize subjected to mechanical impedance in hydroponic conditions. Plant Soil 201:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gyaneshwar P, Kumar GN, Parekh LJ (1998) Effect of buffering on the phosphate-solubilizing ability of microorganisms. W J Microbiol Biotechnol 14:669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iyamuremye F, Dick RP (1996) Organic amendments and phosphorus sorption by soils. Adv Agron 56:139–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jordan D, Ponder F Jr, Hubbard VC (2003) Effects of soil compaction, forest leaf litter and nitrogen fertilizer on two oak species and microbial activity. Appl Soil Ecol 23:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar V, Narula N (1999) Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter chroococcum. Biol Fertil Soils 28:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004) Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86:1–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin JP (1950) Use of acid rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci 69:215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehta S, Nautiyal CS (2001) An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Curr Microbiol 43:51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nautiyal CS, Bhadauria S, Kumar P, Lal H, Mondal R, Verma D (2000) Stress induced phosphate solubilization in bacteria isolated from alkaline soils. FEMS Microbiol Lett 182:291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira ALM, Urquiaga S, Döbereiner J, Baldani JI (2002) The effect of inoculating endophytic N2-fixing bacteria on micropropagated sugarcane plants. Plant Soil 242:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 2. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 403–427Google Scholar
  27. Oussible M, Crookston PK, Larson WE (1992) Subsurface compaction reduces the root and shoot growth and grain yield of wheat. Agron J 84:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pal SS (1998) Interactions of an acid tolerant strain of phosphate solubilizing bacteria with a few acid tolerant crops. Plant Soil 198:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pikovskaya RE (1948) Mobilization of phosphates in soil in connection with vital activities of some microbial species. Mikrobiologia 17:362–370Google Scholar
  30. Puente ME, Bashan Y, Li CY, Lebsky VK (2004a) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. I. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks. Plant Biol 6:629–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Puente ME, Li CY, Bashan Y (2004b) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. II. Growth promotion of cactus seedlings. Plant Biol 6:643–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodriguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez H, Gonzalez T, Goire I, Bashan Y (2004) Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum spp. Naturwissenschaften 91:552–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rojas A, Holguin G, Glick BR, Bashan Y (2001) Synergism between Phyllobacterium sp. (N2-fixer) and Bacillus licheniformis (P-solubilizer), both from a semiarid mangrove rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35:181–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Şahin F, Çakmakçı R, Kantar F (2004) Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil 265:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salle AJ (1973) Laboratory manual on fundamental principles of bacteriology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Shishido M, Chanway CP (1998) Forest soil community responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and spruce seedlings. Biol Fertil Soils 26:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn. USDA-SCS Agriculture Handbook 436. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J (2000) Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:487–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sundara B, Natarajan V, Hari K (2002) Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane and sugar yield. Field Crops Res 77:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vivas A, Marulanda A, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Barea JM, Azcon R (2003) Influence of a Bacillus sp on physiological activities of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant responses to PEG-induced drought stress. Mycorrhiza 13:249–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Welbaum GE, Sturz, AV, Dong ZM, Nowak J (2004) Managing soil microorganisms to improve productivity of agro-ecosystems. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yadav KS, Dadarwal KR (1997) Phosphate solubilization and mobilization through soil microorganisms. In: Dadarwal KR (ed) Biotechnological approaches in soil microorganisms for sustainable crop production. Scientific, Jodhpur, India, pp 293–308Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Y. Canbolat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Serdar Bilen
    • 1
  • Ramazan Çakmakçı
    • 2
  • Fikrettin Şahin
    • 3
    • 4
  • Adil Aydın
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science, Faculty of AgricultureAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Atatürk University Technical Vocational School Ýspir and/or Biotechnology Application and Research CenterErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of AgricultureAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Genetic and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations