Skip to main content
Log in

Fluorescence microscopy for visualization of soil microorganisms—a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct microscopic observation of microorganisms is an important tool in many microbial studies. Such observations have been reported for Protozoa, fungi, inoculated bacteria, and rhizosphere microorganisms but few studies have focused on indigenous bacteria and their spatial relationship within various microhabitats. Principles and applications of epifluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy for visualization of soil microorganisms in situ are reviewed. Both cationic and anionic dyes (also commonly referred to as fluorochromes if they are fluorescent) have been used based on their ability to bind to specific cellular components of microbial cells. Common fluorochromes used for imaging of microbial cells include acridine orange, ethidium bromide, fluorescein isothiocyanate, 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazinyl) aminofluorescein, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, europium chelate, magnesium salt of 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid, and calcofluor white M2R. Combining fluorescence staining techniques with soil thin section technology allows one to obtain images of microorganisms in situ. Soil texture and the procedures used for resin embedding are important factors affecting the quality of stained soil thin sections. Indeed, general limitations of applying fluorescence microscopy to soil ecological studies are the non-specific binding of dyes to the soil matrix and the autofluorescence of some soil components. The development of fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy techniques provides new potential for microbial distribution studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4A–D
Fig. 5A, B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altemüller HJ, van Vliet-Lanoe B (1990) Soil thin section fluorescence microscopy. In: Douglas LA (ed) Soil micromorphology: a basic and applied science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 565–579

  • Bhupathiraju VK, Hernandez M, Krauter P, Alvarez-Cohen L (1999a) A new direct microscopy basedmethod for evaluating in-site bioremediation. J Hazard Mater 67:299–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhupathiraju VK, Hernandez M, Landfear D, Alvarez-Cohen L (1999b) Application of a tetrazolium dye as an indicator of viability in anaerobic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 37:231–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem J, Bolhuis PR, Veninga MR, Wieringa J (1995) Microscopic methods for counting bacteria and fungi in soil. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 162–173

  • Bottomley PJ (1994) Light microscopic methods for studying soil microorganisms. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. (SSSA book series 5) Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis., pp 81–105

  • Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lawrence JR (1992a) Imaging of bacterial cells by fluorescence exclusion using scanning confocal laser microscopy. J Microbiol Methods 15:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lawrence JR (1992b) Confocal laser microscopy and computer image analysis in microbial ecology. Adv Microb Ecol 12:1–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers JJ, Mauras C, Vir R (1997) Confocal microscopic images of a compost particle. Biotechnol Prog 13:727–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Decho AW, Kawaguchi T (1999) Confocal imaging of in situ natural microbial communities and their extracellular polymeric secretions using Nanoplast resin. BioTechniques 27:1246–1252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeo PC, Baveye P, Ghiorse WC (1997) Use of confocal laser scanning microscopy on soil thin-sections for improved characterization of microbial growth in unconsolidated soils and aquifer materials. J Microbiol Methods 30:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk AC, Murphy SL, Tate III RL (1999) Microscopic observations of bacterial sorption in soil cores. Biol Fertil Soils 28:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzPatrick EA (1993) Soil microscopy and micromorphology. Wiley, Chichester

  • Florida State University (2003) Optical microscopy primer, web edition http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/index.html

  • Foster RC (1988) Microenvironments of soil microorganism. Biol Fertil Soils 6:189–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray TRG (1990) Methods for studying the microbial ecology of soil. Methods Microbiol 22:309–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann A, Assmus B, Kirchhof G, Schloter M (1997) Direct approaches for studying soil microbes. In: van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH (eds) Modern soil microbiology. Dekker, New York, pp 279–309

  • Hattori T (1988) Soil aggregates as microhabitats of microorganisms. Rep Inst Agric Res Tohoku Univ 37:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayat MA (1989) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy—biological applications. Macmillan, London

  • Herman B (1998) Microscopy handbooks 40: fluorescence microscopy. BIOS, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonis N, Sawyer WH (1996) Spectral properties of the prototropic forms of fluorescein in aqueous solution. J Fluor 6:147–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE (1991) Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 173:6558–6567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2001) Fluorescence microscopic observations of microorganisms in soil. MSc thesis. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

  • Li Y, Dick WA, Tuovinen OH (2003) Evaluation of fluorochromes for imaging bacteria in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 35:737–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lillie RD (1977) H.J.Conn’s biological stains—a handbook on the nature and uses of the dyes employed in the biological laboratory. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.

  • Lloyd-Jones G, Hunter DWF (2001) Comparison of rapid DNA extraction methods applied to contrasting New Zealand soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:2053–2059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macnaughton SJ, Booth T, Embley TM, O’Donnell AG (1996) Physical stabilization and confocal microscopy of bacteria on roots using 16S rRNA targeted, fluorescent-labeled oligonucleotide probes. J Microbiol Methods 26:279–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda C, Tanaka U, Sonoda M, Kosaki T (1999) Applicability of a combined staining method with fluorochromes for the visualization of microbial cells in a soil thin section. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:745–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield CI (1975) A simple fluorescence staining technique for in situ soil microorganisms. Can J Microbiol 21:727–729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL (1999) Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4715–4724

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molecular Probes (2003) Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals, web edition http://www.probes.com/handbook. Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.

  • Morgan P, Cooper CJ, Battersby NS, Lee SA, Lewis ST, Machin TM, Graham SC, Watkinson RJ (1991) Automated image analysis method to determine fungal biomass in soils and on solid matrices. Soil Biol Biochem 23:609–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan N, Ritz K, Crabb D, Harris K, Wu K, Crawford JW, Young IM (2001) Quantification of the in situ distribution of soil bacteria by large-scale imaging of thin sections of undisturbed soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock SW (1999) An introduction to confocal imaging. In: Paddock SW (ed) Methods in molecular biology: confocal microscopy methods and protocols. Humana, Totowa, N.J., pp 1–34

  • Pickup RW (1995) Sampling and detecting bacterial populations in natural environments. In: Baumberg S, Young JPW, Wellington EMH, Saunders JR (eds) Population genetics of bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 295–315

  • Ploem JS (1993) Fluorescence microscopy. In: Mason WT (ed) Biological techniques: fluorescent and luminescent probes for biological activity—a practical guide to technology for quantitative real-time analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 1–11

  • Ploem JS, Tanke HJ (1987) Microscopy handbooks 10: introduction to fluorescence microscopy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma J, Altemüller HJ (1990) Bacteria in soil thin sections stained with the fluorescent brightner calcofluor white M2R. Soil Biol Biochem 22:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preece TF (1971) Fluorescent techniques in mycology. Methods Microbiol 4:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis V, Lorbeer H, Babel W (1998) Extraction of microorganisms from soil: evaluation of the efficiency by counting methods and activity measurements. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1573–1581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roser DJ (1980) Ethidium bromide: a general purpose fluorescent stain for nucleic acid in bacteria and eucaryotes and its use in microbial ecology studies. Soil Biol Biochem 12:329–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann R, Rentsch D (1998) Staining particulate organic matter with DTAF—a fluorescence dye for carbohydrates and protein: a new approach and application of a 2D image analysis system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard CJR, Shotton DM (1997) Microscopy handbooks 38: confocal laser scanning microscopy. BIOS, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Surman SB, Walker JT, Goddard DT, Morton LHG, Keevil CW, Weaver W, Skinner A, Hanson K, Caldwell D, Kurtz J (1996) Comparison of microscope techniques for the examination of biofilms. J Microbiol Methods 25:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swope KL, Flickinger MC (1996) The use of confocal scanning laser microscopy and other tools to characterize Escherichia coli in a high-cell-density synthetic biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng 52:340–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tien CC, Chao CC, Chao WL (1999) Methods for DNA extraction from various soils: a comparison. J Appl Microbiol 86:937–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tippkötter R (1990) Staining of soil microorganisms and related materials with fluorochromes. In: Douglas LA (ed) Soil micromorphology: a basic and applied science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 605–611

  • Tippkötter R, Ritz K (1996) Evaluation of polyester, epoxy and acrylic resins for suitability in preparation of soil thin sections for in situ biological studies. Geoderma 69:31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippkötter R, Ritz K, Darbyshire JF (1986) The preparation of soil thin section for biological studies. J Soil Sci 37:681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji T, Kawasaki Y, Takeshima S, Sekiya T, Tanaka S (1995) A new fluorescence staining assay for visualizing living microorganisms in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3415–3421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White D, Fitzpatrick EA, Killham K (1994) Use of stained bacterial inocula to assess spatial distribution after introduction into soil. Geoderma 63:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren A Dick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Dick, W.A. & Tuovinen, O.H. Fluorescence microscopy for visualization of soil microorganisms—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 39, 301–311 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0722-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0722-x

Keywords

Navigation