Abstract
In this study, we compare Western oil paintings and Chinese ink paintings on their composition, by extracting and computing 28 composition features of the paintings, including visual balance and relationships between different regions (segments). Among the extracted segments, we compute average distance and rule-based features based on three layout rules, rule of thirds, golden mean and golden triangle. A total of 2253 paintings including 1138 oil paintings and 1115 Chinese ink paintings are collected. By comparing the results of the features on these paintings, our study investigates the difference and similarity between the two types of paintings on composition. Their composition designs are similar in visual balance and their tendency of composing along two diagonal lines, but are fairly different on many other aspects. For example, oil paintings are inclined to place objects on the bottom horizontal dividing lines of rule of thirds and golden mean. Having discovered the most important features that can differentiate the two types of paintings, we analyze the differences in the features and discuss their possible relationships to the culture and artists’ backgrounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author, Zhen-Bao Fan, upon reasonable request.
References
Bao, Y., Yang, T., Lin, X., Fang, Y., Wang, Y., Pöppel, E., Lei, Q.: Aesthetic preferences for Eastern and Western traditional visual art: identity matters. Front. Psychol. 7, 1596 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596
Palmer, S.E., Schloss, K.B., Sammartino, J.: Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 77–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504
Marković, S.: Perceptual, semantic and affective dimensions of experience of abstract and representational paintings. Psihologija 44(3), 191–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.1230
Nisbett, R.E.: The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and Why. Free Press, New York (2003)
Kubovy, M.: The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (1986)
Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(9), 1260–1275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555
Sullivan, M.: The Arts of China, 5th edn. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)
Ji, L., Peng, K., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture, control and perception of relationship in the environment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 943–955 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.943
Attneave, F.: Some informational aspect of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61, 183–193 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054663
Garner, W.R.: Uncertainty and Structure as Psychological Concepts. Wiley, New York (1962)
Attneave, F.: Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. Am. J. Psychol. 68, 209–222 (1955). https://doi.org/10.2307/1418892
Jacobsen, T., Höfel, L.: Aesthetics electrified: an analysis of descriptive symmetry and evaluative aesthetic judgment processes using event-related brain potentials. Empir. Stud. Arts 19(2), 177–190 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2190/P7W1-5F1F-NJK9-X05B
Jacobsen, T., Höfel, L.: Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Percept. Mot. Skills 95(3), 755–766 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.755
Jacobsen, T., Höfel, L.: Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3(4), 289–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.289
Makin, A.D., Wilton, M.M., Pecchinenda, A., Bertamini, M.: Symmetry perception and affective responses: a combined EEG/EMG study. Neuropsychologia 50(14), 3250–3261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.003
Tinio, P.P., Leder, H.: Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 130(3), 241–250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001
Fan, Z.B., Zhang, K.: Visual order of Chinese ink paintings. Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art 3(1), 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-020-00059-5
Attneave, F., Arnoult, M.D.: The quantitative study of shape and pattern recognition. Psychol. Bull. 53(6), 452–471 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044049
Hochberg, J.E., Brooks, V.: The psychophysics of form: Reversible-perspective drawings of spatial objects. Am. J. Psychol. 73, 337–354 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2307/1420172
Fan, Z.B., Li, Y.N., Yu, J., Zhang, K.: Visual complexity of Chinese ink paintings. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, Cottbus, September, 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3119881.3119883
Arnheim, R.: Art and visual perception. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles (1969)
Koffka, K.: Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Kegan, Paul, Trench & Trubner, London (1935)
Wertheimer, M.: Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I (Gestalt theory: the general theoretical situation). In: Ellis, W.D. (ed.) A Source Book of GESTALT Psychology, pp. 12–16. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1938)
Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933)
Eysenck, H.J.: The experimental study of the ‘good Gestalt’—a new approach. Psychol. Rev. 49(4), 344 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057013
Eysenck, H.J.: An experimental study of aesthetic preference for polygonal figures. J. Gen. Psychol. 79(1), 3–17 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1968.9710447
Krupinski, E., Locher, P.: Skin conductance and aesthetic evaluative responses to nonrepresentational works of art varying in symmetry. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 26(4), 355–358 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337681
Nicki, R.M., Moss, V.: Preference for non-representational art as a function of various measures of complexity. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 237 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082029
Osborne, J.W., Farley, F.H.: The relationship between aesthetic preference and visual complexity in absract art. Psychonomic Science 19(2), 69–70 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337424
Stamps, A.E.: Entropy, visual diversity, and preference. J. Gen. Psychol. 129(3), 300–320 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602100
Gombrich, E.H.: The Sense of Order. Phaidon Press, London (1980)
Martindale, C., Moore, K., Borkum, J.: Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psychobiological theory. Am. J. Psychol. 103, 53–80 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1423259
Ross, E.A.: A Theory of Pure Design: HARMONY, Balance, Rhythm. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1907)
Arnheim, R.: New Essays on the Psychology of Art. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles (1986)
Locher, P.J., Stappers, P.J., Overbeeke, K.: The role of balance as an organizing design principle underlying adults’ compositional strategies for creating visual displays. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 99(2), 141–161 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00008-0
McManus, I. C., Stöver, K., Kim, D.: Arnheim’s Gestalt theory of visual balance: Examining the compositional structure of art photographs and abstract images. i-Perception 2(6), 615–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/i0445aap
Palmer, S.E., Guidi, S.: Mapping the perceptual structure of rectangles through goodness-of-fit ratings. Perception 40(12), 1428–1446 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/p7021
Amirshahi, S.A., Hayn-Leichsenring, G.U., Denzler, J., Redies, C.: Evaluating the rule of thirds in photographs and paintings. Art & Perception 2(1–2), 163–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002024
Obrador, P., Schmidt-Hackenberg, L., Oliver, N.: The role of image composition in image aesthetics. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Hong Kong, September, 3185–3188. IEEE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2010.5654231
Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., Wang, J. Z.: Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In: European conference on computer vision, Graz, May, 288–301. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11744078_23
Poore, H.R.: Pictorial Composition and the Critical Judgement of Pictures. Baker and Taylor, New York (1903)
Latto, R., Brain, D., Kelly, B.: An oblique effect in aesthetics: homage to Mondrian (1872–1944). Perception 29(8), 981–987 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1068/p2352
Locher, P.J.: An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 114(2), 147–164 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.001
McManus, I.C., Cheema, B., Stoker, J.: The aesthetics of composition: a study of Mondrian. Empir. Stud. Arts 11(2), 83–94 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2190/HXR4-VU9A-P5D9-BPQQ
Wilson, A., Chatterjee, A.: The assessment of preference for balance: introducing a new test. Empir. Stud. Arts 23(2), 165–180 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2190/B1LR-MVF3-F36X-XR64
Hübner, R., Fillinger, M.G.: Comparison of objective measures for predicting perceptual balance and visual aesthetic preference. Front. Psychol. 7, 335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00335
McManus, I.C., Edmondson, D., Rodger, J.: Balance in pictures. Br. J. Psychol. 76(3), 311–324 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01955.x
Cameron, A.S.: Chinese Painting Techniques. Dover Publications Courier Corporation, Mineola, NY (1993)
Letsch, P., Hayn-Leichsenring, G.U.: The composition of abstract images–Differences between artists and laypersons. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 14(2), 186–196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000209
Van Geert, E., Wagemans, J.: Order, complexity, and aesthetic appreciation. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 14(2), 135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000224
Thömmes, K., Hübner, R.: Instagram likes for architectural photos can be predicted by quantitative balance measures and curvature. Front. Psychol. 9, 1050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01050
Fillinger, M. G., and Hübner, R.: Relations between balance, prototypicality, and aesthetic appreciation for Japanese calligraphy. Emp. Stud. Arts 38(2), 172–190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418805656
Hübner, R., and Fillinger, M. G. Perceptual balance, stability, and aesthetic appreciation: their relations depend on the picture type. i-Perception 10(3) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519856040
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, ZB., Zhu, YX., Marković, S. et al. A comparative study of oil paintings and Chinese ink paintings on composition. Vis Comput 39, 1323–1334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-022-02408-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-022-02408-2