Usability evaluation of virtual reality interaction techniques for positioning and manoeuvring in reduced, manipulation-oriented environments

Abstract

This paper introduces some novel interaction techniques based on the concepts of composite positioning and composite manoeuvring (described in the paper). In contrast with other previous proposals, these techniques have been designed and evaluated in the context of a user centred process. The results of this evaluation and some relevant findings for the field of human computer interaction are also described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Herndon, K.P., van Dam, A., Gleicher, M.: The challenges of 3D interaction: a CHI ’94 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 26(4), 36–46 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J. Jr., Poupyrev, I.: An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence 10(1), 96–108 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pittarello, F., Celentano, A.: Interaction locus: a multimodal approach for the structuring of virtual spaces. In: Proc. of HCITaly Symposium (2001)

  4. 4.

    Barrilleaux, J.: 3D User Interfaces with Java3D. Manning Publications (2001)

  5. 5.

    Sutcliffe, A.: Multimedia and Virtual Reality: Designing Multisensory User Interfaces. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boyd, D., Sastry, L.: Development of the INQUISITIVE interaction toolkit—concept and realisation. In: User Centered Design and Implementation of Virtual Environments (UCDIVE) Workshop (1999)

  7. 7.

    Poupyrev, I., Weghorst, S., Billinghurst, M., Ichikawa, T.: Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. Comput. Graph. Forum 17(3), 41–52 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J. Jr., Poupyrev, E.I.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bowman, D.A., Gabbard, J.L., Hix, D.: A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: classification and comparison of methods. Presence 11(4), 435–455 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kiyokawa, K., Takemura, H., Katayama, Y., Iwasa, H., Yokoya, N.: VLEGO: a simple two-handed modeling environment based on toy blocks. In: Proc. ACM Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 27–34 (1996)

  11. 11.

    Heldal, I., Steed, A., Schroeder, R.: Evaluating Collaboration in Distributed Virtual Environments for a Puzzle-solving Task. HCI International (2005)

  12. 12.

    Garcia, A.S., et al.: Collaborative virtual environments: you can’t do it alone, can you? In: HCII ’07. Virtual Reality, vol. 4563, pp. 224–233. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Roberts, D., Wolff, R., Otto, O., Steed, A.: Constructing a gazebo: supporting teamwork in a tightly coupled, distributed task in virtual reality. Presence 16(6), 644–657 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Martinez, D., Garcia, A.S., Martinez, J., Molina, J.P., Gonzalez, P.: A model of interaction for CVEs based in the model of human communication. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 14(19), 3071–3084 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lawson, J.-Y., Al-Akkad, A., Vanderdonckt, J., Macq, B.: An open source workbench for prototyping multimodal interactions based on off-the-shelf heterogeneous components. In: Proc. of the First ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 245–254. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gabbard, J.L., Hix, D., Swan, J.E.: User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 19(6), 51–59 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moss, J., Scisco, J., Muth, E.: Simulator sickness during HMD of real world video captured scenes. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, vol. 52, No. 19, pp. 1631–1634 (2008)

  18. 18.

    Hakkinen, J., Vuori, T., Paakka, M.: Postural stability and sickness symptoms after HMD use. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 147–152 (2002)

  19. 19.

    Johansson, R.S., Westling, G., Backstrom, A., Flanagan, J.R.: Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J. Neurosci. 21(17), 6917–6932 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Poupyrev, I., Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S., Ichikawa, T.: The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. In: Proc. of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, pp. 79–80 (1996)

  21. 21.

    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    ISO 9241, Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display Terminals (VDTs) (1998)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Martinez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinez, D., Kieffer, S., Martinez, J. et al. Usability evaluation of virtual reality interaction techniques for positioning and manoeuvring in reduced, manipulation-oriented environments. Vis Comput 26, 619–628 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-010-0499-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Virtual reality
  • Interaction techniques
  • Usability evaluation