Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the optical properties of suspended particulate matter of coral reef environments using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method

  • Original
  • Published:
Geo-Marine Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optical scattering properties of non-spherical calcium carbonate particles were modelled using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method. This algorithm is computationally expensive but an implementation running on a standard computer’s graphics processing unit (GPU) provided up to 40 times speed increase and made feasible several thousand model runs for particles up to size parameter 33 (4 μm for a wavelength of 376 nm in water). The model evaluates all coefficients of the single-particle Mueller matrix and, when applied to spheres in this size range, compares closely to Mie theory. The modelled unpolarised and polarised angular irradiance scattering from elongate calcium carbonate spicules displayed many differences from that of spheres of equivalent volume. Scattering features were observed that are not immediately obvious consequences of spicule geometry. The extinction efficiency of these particles is also less than that of spheres of equivalent volume. These results suggest both potential consequences of the non-sphericity of particles on instrument calibration and radiative transfer modelling, and opportunities for information extraction by polarimetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adjas A, Masse J-P, Montaggioni L (1990) Fine-grained carbonates in nearly closed reef environments: Mataiva and Takapoto atolls, Central Pacific Ocean. Sediment Geol 67:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal YC, Mikkelsen OA (2009) Empirical forward scattering phase functions from 0.08 to 16 deg. for randomly shaped terrigenous 1–21 μm sediment grains. Opt Express 17:8805–8814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal YC, Pottsmith HC (2000) Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport. Mar Geol 168:89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal YC, Whitmire A, Mikkelsen OA, Pottsmith HC (2008) Light scattering by random shaped particles and consequences on measuring suspended sediments by laser diffraction. J Geophys Res 113:C04023. doi:10.1029/2007JC004403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohren CF, Huffman DR (1983) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss E, Pegau WS (2001) Relationship of light scattering at an angle in the backward direction to the backscattering coefficient. Appl Optics 40:5503–5507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss E, Slade WH, Behrenfeld M, Dall’Olmo G (2009) Acceptance angle effects on the beam attenuation in the ocean. Opt Express 17:1535–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chami M, Marken E, Stamnes JJ, Khomenko G, Korotaev G (2006) Variability of the relationship between the particulate backscattering coefficient and the volume scattering function measured at fixed angles. J Geophys Res 111:C05013. doi:10.1029/2005JC003230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn AK (1997) Light scattering properties of cells. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin

  • Enríquez S, Méndez ER, Iglesias-Prieto R (2005) Multiple scattering on coral skeletons enhances light absorption by symbiotic algae. Limnol Oceanogr 50:1025–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Q, Boas DA (2009) Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units. Opt Express 22:20178–20190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier GR, Forand JL (1994) Analytic phase function for ocean water. In: Jaffe JS (ed), Ocean Optics XII. Proc SPIE 2258:194–201

  • Furse CM, Gandhi OP (1995) Why the DFT is faster than the FFT for FDTD time-to-frequency domain conversions. IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett 5:326–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Xi Y, Huang WP (2010) Acceleration of FDTD mode solver by high-performance computing techniques. Opt Express 18:13679–13692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (1996) Fourier analysis of numerical algorithms for the Maxwell equations. J Comput Phys 124:396–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luebbers RJ, Schneider M (1991) A finite-difference time-domain near zone to far zone transformation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagation 39:429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley CD, Sundman LK, Boss E (2002) Phase function effects on oceanic light fields. Appl Optics 41:1035–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley CD, Sundman LK, Davis CO, Bowles JH, Downes TV, Leathers RA, Montes MJ, Bisset WP, Kohler DDR, Reid RP, Louchard EM, Gleason A (2005) Interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing imagery by spectrum matching and look-up tables. Appl Optics 44:3576–3592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orofino V, Blanco A, Fonti S, Marra AC, Polimeno N (2002) The complex refractive index of limestone particles: an extension to the FIR range for Mars applications. Planet Space Sci 50:839–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinrad RW, Zaneveld JRV, Kitchen JC (1983) A study of the optical characteristics of the suspended particles in the benthic nepheloid layer of the Scotian shelf. J Geophys Res 88:7641–7645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Fu Q, Chen Z (1999) Finite-difference time-domain solution of light scattering by dielectric particles with a perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition. Appl Optics 38:3141–3151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taflove A, Brodwin ME (1975) Numerical solution of steady-state electromagnetic scattering problems using the time-dependent Maxwell’s equations. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 23:623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taflove A, Hagness SC (2005) Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method, 3rd edn. Artech House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal CJ, Micheal KJ, Nunez M (2009) Partitioning of underwater direct and diffuse ultraviolet irradiance in a shallow water coral reef. Mar Freshwater Res 60:1244–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (1993) Corals of Australia and the Indo-Pacific. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Liou KN, Mischenko MI, Gao B-C (2000) Efficient finite-difference time-domain scheme for light scattering by dielectric particles: application to aerosols. Appl Optics 39:3727–3737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee KS (1966) Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagation 14:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the contribution of the editors and two anonymous reviewers whose comments assisted in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hedley.

Additional information

Responsible guest editor: M. Chami

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedley, J. Modelling the optical properties of suspended particulate matter of coral reef environments using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method. Geo-Mar Lett 32, 173–182 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-011-0265-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-011-0265-8

Keywords

Navigation