Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian active learning approach for estimation of empirical copula-based moment-independent sensitivity indices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The moment-independent global sensitivity method is an important branch among the prosperous developments of global sensitivity analysis. It can quantify the influence of input variables on the uncertainty of model output by taking the entire distribution ranges into account. However, the fast and accurate estimation still remains a challenging task in engineering practices. This article aims at developing a robust and efficient sensitivity analysis approach by leveraging the superiority of Bayesian active learning technology. An algorithm called active learning of cumulative distribution function (AL-CDF) is proposed to efficiently derive an accurate CDF of model output with a small group of training data. In AL-CDF algorithm, a modified U-learning function is defined to determine the best point to guide the learning process of CDF. Moreover, an innovative stopping criterion is specially designed based on functional samples of posterior Gaussian process, aided by an advanced Gaussian process generator. Once the AL-CDF is completed, the Bayesian inference of moment-independent indices by empirical-Copula method can be directly applied in a pure statistic manner, with no more evaluations of the complex performance function. From this perspective, the main computational cost is consumed in the AL-CDF procedure. In addition, benefiting from the sampling strategy from posterior GPR model, the posterior variations of moment-independent sensitivity indices can be derived as by-products. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed work is demonstrated by a nonlinear numerical example, a wing flutter model as well as the NASA Langley multidisciplinary challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Der Kiureghian A, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aven T (2010) On the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability. Risk Anal Int J 30(3):354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou C, Shi Z, Kucherenko S, Zhao H (2022) A unified approach for global sensitivity analysis based on active subspace and kriging. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 217:108080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang P, Li C, Liu F, Zhou H (2022) Global sensitivity analysis of failure probability of structures with uncertainties of random variable and their distribution parameters. Eng Comput 38(Suppl 5):4367–4385

    Google Scholar 

  6. El Amri MR, Marrel A (2022) Optimized hsic-based tests for sensitivity analysis: application to thermalhydraulic simulation of accidental scenario on nuclear reactor. Qual Reliab Eng Int 38(3):1386–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan S, Kaklis P, Serani A, Diez M (2022) Geometric moment-dependent global sensitivity analysis without simulation data: application to ship hull form optimisation. Comput Aided Des 151:103339

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang P, Zhu H, Tian H, Cai G (2021) Analytic target cascading with fuzzy uncertainties based on global sensitivity analysis for overall design of launch vehicle powered by hybrid rocket motor. Aerosp Sci Technol 114:106680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dasari SK, Cheddad A, Andersson P (2020) Predictive modelling to support sensitivity analysis for robust design in aerospace engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61:2177–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobol’ IM, Asotsky D, Kreinin A, Kucherenko S (2011) Construction and comparison of high-dimensional Sobol’generators. Wilmott 2011(56):64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen AB (2013) Better estimation of small sobol’sensitivity indices. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul (TOMACS) 23(2):1–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33(2):161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A (2007) An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Model Softw 22(10):1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borgonovo E (2007) A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92(6):771–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Borgonovo E, Plischke E (2016) Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances. Eur J Oper Res 248(3):869–887

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Derennes P, Morio J, Simatos F (2019) A nonparametric importance sampling estimator for moment independent importance measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 187:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barr J, Rabitz H (2022) A generalized kernel method for global sensitivity analysis. SIAM ASA J Uncertain Quantif 10(1):27–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarazin G, Derennes P, Morio J (2020) Estimation of high-order moment-independent importance measures for shapley value analysis. Appl Math Model 88:396–417

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Cucurachi S, Blanco CF, Steubing B, Heijungs R (2022) Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment-independent global sensitivity analysis for full-scale life cycle assessment models. J Ind Ecol 26(2):374–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang F, Xu X, Cheng L, Wang L, Liu Z, Zhang L (2019) Global moment-independent sensitivity analysis of single-stage thermoelectric refrigeration system. Energy Res 43:9055–9064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yun W, Lu Z, Jiang X (2019) An efficient method for moment-independent global sensitivity analysis by dimensional reduction technique and principle of maximum entropy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 187:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Novák L (2022) On distribution-based global sensitivity analysis by polynomial chaos expansion. Comput Struct 267:106808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei P, Lu Z, Yuan X (2013) Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 110:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei P, Lu Z, Song J (2014) Moment-independent sensitivity analysis using copula. Risk Anal 34(2):210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Han M, Huang Q, Ouyang L, Zhao X (2023) A kriging-based active learning algorithm for contour estimation of integrated response with noise factors. Eng Comput 39:1341–1362

  26. Kushari S, Mukhopadhyay T, Chakraborty A, Maity S, Dey S (2022) Probability-based unified sensitivity analysis for multi-objective performances of composite laminates: a surrogate-assisted approach. Compos Struct 294:115559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song J, Wei P, Valdebenito MA, Faes M, Beer M (2022) Data-driven and active learning of variance-based sensitivity indices with Bayesian probabilistic integration. Mech Syst Signal Process 163:108106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolff EF (1980) N-dimensional measures of dependence. Stochastica 4(3):175–188

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei P, Zheng Y, Fu J, Xu Y, Gao W (2023) An expected integrated error reduction function for accelerating Bayesian active learning of failure probability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 231:108971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelsen RB (2007) An introduction to copulas. Springer science & business media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  31. Genest C, Favre A-C (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Botev ZI, Grotowski JF, Kroese DP (2010) Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann Stat 38(5):2916–2957

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge

  34. Le Gratiet L, Cannamela C, Iooss B (2014) A Bayesian approach for global sensitivity analysis of (multifidelity) computer codes. SIAM ASA J Uncertain Quantif 2(1):336–363

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen J, Sun W, Li J, Xu J (2013) Stochastic harmonic function representation of stochastic processes. J Appl Mech 80(1):011001

  36. Zhao N, Huang G, Kareem A, Li Y, Peng L (2021) Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes: an enhanced spectral representation method. Mech Syst Signal Process 161:107949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang S, Quek S, Phoon K (2001) Convergence study of the truncated Karhunen–Loeve expansion for simulation of stochastic processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(9):1029–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining kriging and monte carlo simulation. Struct Saf 33(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. He W, Li G, Zhong C, Wang Y (2023) A novel data-driven sparse polynomial chaos expansion for high-dimensional problems based on active subspace and sparse bayesian learning. Struct Multidiscip Optim 66(1):29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Ye Z, Zhang W, Shi A et al (2010) Fundamentals of fluid-structure coupling and its application. Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  41. Crespo LG, Kenny SP, Giesy DP (2014) The Nasa Langley multidisciplinary uncertainty quantification challenge. 16th AIAA Non-deterministic approaches conference, 13–17 January, Maryland, 1347

  42. Patelli E, Alvarez DA, Broggi M, Angelis M (2015) Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary design of critical safety systems. J Aerosp Inf Syst 12(1):140–169

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bi S, Broggi M, Wei P, Beer M (2019) The bhattacharyya distance: enriching the p-box in stochastic sensitivity analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 129:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant numbers 12202358 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The first author is supported by the Qin Chuangyuan high-level innovation and entrepreneurship talent projects (2023–2025) in Shannxi Province of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingwen Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Zhang, Y., Cui, Y. et al. Bayesian active learning approach for estimation of empirical copula-based moment-independent sensitivity indices. Engineering with Computers 40, 1247–1263 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01865-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01865-0

Keywords

Navigation