Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling of dendritic solidification and numerical analysis of the phase-field approach to model complex morphologies in alloys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dendrites are one of the most widely observed patterns in nature, and occur across a wide spectrum of physical phenomena—from snow flakes to river basins; from bacterial colonies to lungs and vascular systems; and in solidification and growth patterns in metals and crystals. The ubiquitous occurrence of these “tree-like” structures can be attributed to their excellent space-filling properties, and at times, dendritic structures also spatially manifest fractal-like distributions. As is the case with many fractal-like geometries, the complex multi-level branching structures in dendrites pose a modeling challenge, and a full resolution of dendritic structures is computationally very demanding. In the literature, extensive theoretical models of dendritic formation and evolution, essentially as extensions of the classical moving boundary Stefan problem exist. Much of this understanding is from the analysis of dendrites occurring during the solidification of metallic alloys, as this is critical for understanding microstructure evolution during metal manufacturing processes that involve solidification of a liquid melt. Motivated by the problem of modeling microstructure evolution from liquid melts of pure metals and metallic alloys during metal additive manufacturing, we developed a comprehensive numerical framework for modeling a large variety of dendritic structures that are relevant to metal solidification. In this work, we present a numerical framework encompassing the modeling of Stefan problem formulations relevant to dendritic evolution using a phase-field approach and a finite element method implementation. Using this framework, we model numerous complex dendritic morphologies that are physically relevant to the solidification of pure melts and binary alloys. The distinguishing aspects of this work are—a unified treatment of both pure metals and alloys; novel numerical error estimates of dendritic tip velocity; and the study of error convergence of the primal fields of temperature and the order parameter with respect to numerical discretization. To the best of our knowledge, this is a first of its kind study of numerical convergence of the phase-field equations of dendritic growth in a finite element method setting. Further, using this numerical framework, various types of physically relevant dendritic solidification patterns like single equiaxed, multi-equiaxed, single columnar and multi-columnar dendrites are modeled in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computational domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubinstein LI (1971) The stefan problem, transl. math. Monographs 27:327–3

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer Gunter H (1978) The numerical solution of stefan problems with front-tracking and smoothing methods. Appl Math Comput 4(4):283–306

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall G (1986) A front tracking method for one-dimensional moving boundary problems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7(1):252–263

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dantzig Jonathan A, Michel R (2016) Solidification: -revised & expanded. EPFL press, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S, Merriman B, Osher S, Smereka P (1997) A simple level set method for solving stefan problems. J Comput Phys 135(1):8–29

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fix G (1983) Phase field method for free boundary problems. In: Fasanao, Primicerio M (eds) Free boundary problems. Pit-mann, London

  7. Collins JB, Levine H (1985) Diffuse interface model of diffusion-limited crystal growth. Phys Rev B 31(9):6119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caginalp G (1986) An analysis of a phase field model of a free boundary. Arch Ration Mech Anal 92(3):205–245

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Caginalp G (1989) Stefan and hele-shaw type models as asymptotic limits of the phase-field equations. Phys Rev A 39(11):5887

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi R (1993) Modeling and numerical simulations of dendritic crystal growth. Phys D 63(3–4):410–423

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karma A, Rappel W-J (1996) Phase-field method for computationally efficient modeling of solidification with arbitrary interface kinetics. Phys Rev E 53(4):R3017

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karma A, Rappel W-J (1999) Phase-field model of dendritic sidebranching with thermal noise. Phys Rev E 60(4):3614

    Google Scholar 

  13. Plapp M, Karma A (2000) Multiscale finite-difference-diffusion-monte-carlo method for simulating dendritic solidification. J Comput Phys 165(2):592–619

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Warren JA, Boettinger WJ (1995) Prediction of dendritic growth and microsegregation patterns in a binary alloy using the phase-field method. Acta Metall Mater 43(2):689–703

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loginova I, Amberg G, Ågren J (2001) Phase-field simulations of non-isothermal binary alloy solidification. Acta Mater 49(4):573–581

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karma A (2001) Phase-field formulation for quantitative modeling of alloy solidification. Phys Rev Lett 87(11):115701

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramirez JC, Beckermann C, Karma A, Diepers H-J (2004) Phase-field modeling of binary alloy solidification with coupled heat and solute diffusion. Phys Rev E 69(5):051607

    Google Scholar 

  18. Echebarria B, Folch R, Karma A, Plapp M (2004) Quantitative phase-field model of alloy solidification. Phys Rev E 70(6):061604

    Google Scholar 

  19. Almgren RF (1999) Second-order phase field asymptotics for unequal conductivities. SIAM J Appl Math 59(6):2086–2107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohno M, Matsuura K (2009) Quantitative phase-field modeling for dilute alloy solidification involving diffusion in the solid. Phys Rev E 79(3):031603

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feng X, Prohl A (2004) Analysis of a fully discrete finite element method for the phase field model and approximation of its sharp interface limits. Math Comput 73(246):541–567

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzalez-Ferreiro B, Gómez H, Romero I (2014) A thermodynamically consistent numerical method for a phase field model of solidification. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19(7):2309–2323

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen C, Yang X (2019) Efficient numerical scheme for a dendritic solidification phase field model with melt convection. J Comput Phys 388:41–62

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler D, Scheid J-F (2002) A priori error estimates of a finite-element method for an isothermal phase-field model related to the solidification process of a binary alloy. IMA J Numer Anal 22(2):281–305

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Xianliang H, Li R, Tang T (2009) A multi-mesh adaptive finite element approximation to phase field models. Commun Comput Phys 5(5):1012–1029

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosam J, Jimack PK, Mullis A (2007) A fully implicit, fully adaptive time and space discretisation method for phase-field simulation of binary alloy solidification. J Comput Phys 225(2):1271–1287

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Damien T, Hong L, Javier LL (2022) Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: recent applications, perspectives and challenges. Progress Mater Sci 123:100810

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Z, Li J, Wang J, Zhou Y (2012) Phase field modeling the selection mechanism of primary dendritic spacing in directional solidification. Acta Mater 60(5):1957–1964

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fallah V, Amoorezaei M, Provatas N, Corbin SF, Khajepour A (2012) Phase-field simulation of solidification morphology in laser powder deposition of ti-nb alloys. Acta Mater 60(4):1633–1646

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tourret D, Karma A (2015) Growth competition of columnar dendritic grains: a phase-field study. Acta Mater 82:64–83

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takaki T, Ohno M, Shimokawabe T, Aoki T (2014) Two-dimensional phase-field simulations of dendrite competitive growth during the directional solidification of a binary alloy bicrystal. Acta Mater 81:272–283

    Google Scholar 

  32. Geng S, Jiang P, Shao X, Mi G, Han W, Ai Y, Wang C, Han C, Chen R, Liu W et al (2018) Effects of back-diffusion on solidification cracking susceptibility of al-mg alloys during welding: a phase-field study. Acta Mater 160:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  33. Farzadi A, Minh Do-Quang S, Serajzadeh AHK, Amberg G (2008) Phase-field simulation of weld solidification microstructure in an al-cu alloy. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 16(6):065005

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X, Liu PW, Ji Y, Liu Y, Horstemeyer MH, Chen L (2019) Investigation on microsegregation of in718 alloy during additive manufacturing via integrated phase-field and finite-element modeling. J Mater Eng Perform 28(2):657–665

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rolchigo MR, Mendoza MY, Samimi P, Brice DA, Martin B, Collins PC, LeSar R (2017) Modeling of ti-w solidification microstructures under additive manufacturing conditions. Metall and Mater Trans A 48(7):3606–3622

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ghosh S, Ma L, Ofori-Opoku N, Guyer JE (2017) On the primary spacing and microsegregation of cellular dendrites in laser deposited ni-nb alloys. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 25(6):065002

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gong X, Chou K (2015) Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution in electron beam additive manufacturing. JOM 67(5):1176–1182

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sahoo S, Chou K (2016) Phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution of ti-6al-4v in electron beam additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 9:14–24

    Google Scholar 

  39. Keller T, Lindwall G, Ghosh S, Ma L, Lane BM, Zhang F, Kattner UR, Lass EA, Heigel JC, Idell Y et al (2017) Application of finite element, phase-field, and calphad-based methods to additive manufacturing of ni-based superalloys. Acta Mater 139:244–253

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vladimir S, Stefka D, Oleg I (2003) Phase-field method for 2d dendritic growth. In: International conference on large-scale scientific computing. Springer, pp 404–411

  41. Boettinger WJ, Warren JA, Beckermann C, Karma A (2002) Phase-field simulation of solidification. Annu Rev Mater Res 32(1):163–194

    Google Scholar 

  42. Karma A, Rappel W-J (1998) Quantitative phase-field modeling of dendritic growth in two and three dimensions. Phys Rev E 57(4):4323

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Hieram NH (2017) Phase-field modeling of solidification and coarsening effects in dendrite morphology evolution and fragmentation. PhD thesis, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, 8 2017. An optional note

  44. Daniel A, Wolfgang B, Bruno B, Marc F, Rene G, Timo H, Luca H, Uwe K, Martin K, Matthias M, Peter M, Jean-Paul P, Sebastian P, Konrad S, Bruno T, David W, Jiaqi Z (2021) The deal.II library, version 9.3. J Numer Math 29(3):171–186

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Calo VM, Collier N, Dalcin L (2013) PetIGA: high-performance isogeometric analysis. arXiv:1305.4452

  46. Wang Z, Rudraraju S, Garikipati K (2016) A three dimensional field formulation, and isogeometric solutions to point and line defects using toupin’s theory of gradient elasticity at finite strains. J Mech Phys Solids 94:336–361

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Tonghu J, Shiva R, Roy A, Van der Ven A, Garikipati K, Falk ML (2016) Multiphysics simulations of lithiation-induced stress in \(li_{1+x}ti_2o_4\) electrode particles. J Phys Chem C 120(49):27871–27881

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rudraraju S, Moulton DE, Chirat R, Goriely A, Garikipati K (2019) A computational framework for the morpho-elastic development of molluskan shells by surface and volume growth. PLoS Comput Biol 15(7):e1007213

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bhagat K (2022) Phase-field based dendritic modeling. https://github.com/cmmg/dendriticGrowth

  50. Zhu C, Sheng X, Feng L, Han D, Wang K (2019) Phase-field model simulations of alloy directional solidification and seaweed-like microstructure evolution based on adaptive finite element method. Comput Mater Sci 160:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  51. VisIt: an end-user tool for visualizing and analyzing very large data. https://visit.llnl.gov. Accessed Oct 2012

  52. Gibou F, Fedkiw R, Caflisch R, Osher S (2003) A level set approach for the numerical simulation of dendritic growth. J Sci Comput 19(1):183–199

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Bieterman M, Babuška I (1982) The finite element method for parabolic equations. Numer Math 40(3):373–406

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Stephen DW, Shiva R, David M, Beck AW, Katsuyo T (2020) Prisms-pf: a general framework for phase-field modeling with a matrix-free finite element method. NPJ Comput Mater 6(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dan Thoma (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and Dr. Kaila Bertsch (University of Wisconsin-Madison; now at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) for very useful discussions on dendritic growth and microstructure evolution in the context of additive manufacturing of metallic alloys.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Kunal Bhagat & Shiva Rudraraju

Authors
  1. Kunal Bhagat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiva Rudraraju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiva Rudraraju.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhagat, K., Rudraraju, S. Modeling of dendritic solidification and numerical analysis of the phase-field approach to model complex morphologies in alloys. Engineering with Computers 39, 2345–2363 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01767-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01767-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation