Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective mixture design and optimisation of steel fiber reinforced UHPC using machine learning algorithms and metaheuristics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a recent class of concrete with improved durability, rheological and mechanical and durability properties compared to traditional concrete. The production cost of UHPC is considerably high due to a large amount of cement used, and also the high price of other required constituents such as quartz powder, silica fume, fibres and superplasticisers. To achieve specific requirements such as desired production cost, strength and flowability, the proportions of UHPC’s constituents must be well adjusted. The traditional mixture design of concrete requires cumbersome, costly and extensive experimental program. Therefore, mathematical optimisation, design of experiments (DOE) and statistical mixture design (SMD) methods have been used in recent years, particularly for meeting multiple objectives. In traditional methods, simple regression models such as multiple linear regression models are used as objective functions according to the requirements. Once the model is constructed, mathematical programming and simplex algorithms are usually used to find optimal solutions. However, a more flexible procedure enabling the use of high accuracy nonlinear models and defining different scenarios for multi-objective mixture design is required, particularly when it comes to data which are not well structured to fit simple regression models such as multiple linear regression. This paper aims to demonstrate a procedure integrating machine learning (ML) algorithms such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to develop high-accuracy models, and a metaheuristic optimisation algorithm called Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) algorithm for multi-objective mixture design and optimisation of UHPC reinforced with steel fibers. A reliable experimental dataset is used to develop the models and to justify the final results. The comparison of the obtained results with the experimental results validates the capability of the proposed procedure for multi-objective mixture design and optimisation of steel fiber reinforced UHPC. The proposed procedure not only reduces the efforts in the experimental design of UHPC but also leads to the optimal mixtures when the designer faces strength-flowability-cost paradoxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Tang M-C High performance concrete—past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on UHPC, Kassel, Germany, 2004. pp 3–9

  2. Ahmad S, Rasul M, Adekunle SK, Al-Dulaijan SU, Maslehuddin M, Ali SI (2019) Mechanical properties of steel fiber-reinforced UHPC mixtures exposed to elevated temperature: effects of exposure duration and fiber content. Compos B Eng 168:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeh I-C (2009) Optimisation of concrete mix proportioning using a flattened simplex–centroid mixture design and neural networks. Eng Comput 25(2):179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas S, Nehdi M, Saleem M (2016) Ultra-high performance concrete: Mechanical performance, durability, sustainability and implementation challenges. Int J Concr Struct Mater 10(3):271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt M, Fehling E (2005) Ultra-high-performance concrete: research, development and application in Europe. ACI Sp Publ 228:51–78

    Google Scholar 

  6. Talebinejad I, Bassam SA, Iranmanesh A (2004) Shekarchizadeh M Optimising mix proportions of normal weight reactive powder concrete with strengths of 200–350 MPa. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on UHPC, Kassel, Germany, 2004. pp 133–141

  7. Qu D, Cai X, Chang W (2018) Evaluating the effects of steel fibers on mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Appl Sci 8(7):1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghafari E, Bandarabadi M, Costa H, Júlio E (2015) Prediction of fresh and hardened state properties of UHPC: comparative study of statistical mixture design and an artificial neural network model. J Mater Civ Eng 27(11):04015017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Simon M (2003) Concrete mixture optimisation using statistical methods. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure

  10. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimisation in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76(5):965–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cornell JA (2011) Experiments with mixtures: designs, models, and the analysis of mixture data, vol 403. Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon MJ, Lagergren ES, Snyder KA (1997) Concrete mixture optimization using statistical mixture design methods. In: Proceedings of the PCI/FHWA international symposium on high performance concrete. pp 230–244

  13. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadrossadat E, Basarir H (2019) An evolutionary-based prediction model of the 28-day compressive strength of high-performance concrete containing cementitious materials. Adv Civ Eng Mater 8(3):484–497

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sadrossadat E, Basarir H, Karrech A, Durham R, Fourie A, Bin H The optimisation of cemented hydraulic backfill mixture design parameters for different strength conditions using artificial intelligence algorithms. In: International Symposium on Mine Planning & Equipment Selection, 2019. Springer, pp 219–227

  16. Ziaee SA, Sadrossadat E, Alavi AH, Shadmehri DM (2015) Explicit formulation of bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rock masses using artificial neural networks: application and supplementary studies. Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3417–3431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan J, Asteris PG, Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Moayedi H (2020) A novel artificial intelligence technique to predict compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using ICA-XGBoost model. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01003-0

  18. Asteris PG, Kolovos KG (2019) Self-compacting concrete strength prediction using surrogate models. Neural Comput Appl 31(1):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadrossadat E, Soltani F, Mousavi SM, Marandi SM, Alavi AH (2013) A new design equation for prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation on granular soils. J Civ Eng Manag 19(sup1):S78–S90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadrossadat E, Basarir H, Luo G, Karrech A, Durham R, Fourie A, Elchalakani M (2020) Multi-objective mixture design of cemented paste backfill using particle swarm optimisation algorithm. Miner Eng 153:106385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bui DT, Ghareh S, Moayedi H, Nguyen H (2019) Fine-tuning of neural computing using whale optimisation algorithm for predicting compressive strength of concrete. Eng Comput 37:701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00850-w

  22. Sun L, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Tarinejad R, Tahir MM (2019) Applying a meta-heuristic algorithm to predict and optimise compressive strength of concrete samples. Eng Comput 37:1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00875-1

  23. Dehghani A, Fischer G, Alahi FN (2015) Strengthening masonry infill panels using engineered cementitious composites. Mater Struct 48(1–2):185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Belhadj T, Abbassi F, Mistou S, Zghal A (2010) Numerical analyses of tube hydroforming problem using artificial neural networks. Int J Mater Form 3(1):295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutta S, Samui P, Kim D (2018) Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict compressive strength of concrete. Comput Concr 21(4):463–470

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoang N-D, Pham A-D, Nguyen Q-L, Pham Q-N (2016) Estimating compressive strength of high performance concrete with Gaussian process regression model. Adv Civ Eng 2016: Article ID 2861380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2861380

  27. Zhang N, Xiong J, Zhong J, Leatham K (2018) Gaussian process regression method for classification for high-dimensional data with limited samples. In: 2018 Eighth International Conference on Information science and technology (ICIST), 2018. IEEE, pp 358–363

  28. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Song Y, Keller J, Bond P, Jiang G (2017) Prediction of concrete corrosion in sewers with hybrid Gaussian processes regression model. RSC Adv 7(49):30894–30903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasmussen CE (2004) Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Bousquet O, von Luxburg U, Rätsch G (eds) Advanced lectures on machine learning. ML 2003. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4

  31. Zhang J, Ma G, Huang Y, Aslani F, Nener B (2019) Modelling uniaxial compressive strength of lightweight self-compacting concrete using random forest regression. Constr Build Mater 210:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abbassi F, Belhadj T, Mistou S, Zghal A (2013) Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using Artificial Neural Networks in sheet metal forming. Mater Des 45:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abbassi F, Ahmad F, Gulzar S, Belhadj T, Karrech A, Choi HS (2020) Design of T-shaped tube hydroforming using finite element and artificial neural network modeling. J Mech Sci Technol 34(3):1129–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2(4):303–314

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Coello CAC (2011) An introduction to multi-objective particle swarm optimizers. In: Gaspar-Cunha A, Takahashi R, Schaefer G, Costa L (eds) Soft computing in industrial applications. Advances in intelligent and soft computing, vol 96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20505-7_1

  36. Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE (2006) Multi-objective optimisation using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(9):992–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coello CC, Lechuga MS (2002) MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimisation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No. 02TH8600), 2002. IEEE, pp 1051–1056

  38. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimisation. In: Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on neural networks, 1995. IEEE, pp 1942–1948

  39. Sierra MR, Coello CAC (2005) Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimisation using crowding, mutation and∈-dominance. International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimisation. Springer, pp 505–519

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Tripathi PK, Bandyopadhyay S, Pal SK (2007) Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients. Inf Sci 177(22):5033–5049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Y, Yang Y (2009) Particle swarm optimisation with preference order ranking for multi-objective optimisation. Inf Sci 179(12):1944–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang D, Tan D, Liu L (2018) Particle swarm optimisation algorithm: an overview. Soft Comput 22(2):387–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimisation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen S (2016) Constrained particle swarm optimisation. Matlab central file exchange https://www.mathworks com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25986. Accessed 28 Apr 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Ehsan Sadrossadat, Ali Karrech & Mohamed Elchalakani

  2. Department of Petroleum and Geosciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Hakan Basarir

Authors
  1. Ehsan Sadrossadat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hakan Basarir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Karrech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamed Elchalakani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ehsan Sadrossadat, Hakan Basarir, Ali Karrech or Mohamed Elchalakani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadrossadat, E., Basarir, H., Karrech, A. et al. Multi-objective mixture design and optimisation of steel fiber reinforced UHPC using machine learning algorithms and metaheuristics. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 3), 2569–2582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01403-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01403-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation