Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Inverse problem for dynamic structural health monitoring based on slime mould algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, damage detection, localization and quantification are performed using modal strain energy change ratio (MSEcr) as damage indicator combined with a new optimization technique, namely slime mould algorithm (SMA) developed in 2020. The SMA algorithm is employed to assess structural damage and monitor structural health. Two structures, including a laboratory beam and a bar planar truss are considered to study the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Another recent algorithm called marine predators algorithm (MPA) is also used for comparison purposes with SMA. The MSEcr is utilized in the first stage to predict the location of the damaged elements. Single and multiple damages cases are analysed based on different number of modes to study the sensitivity of the proposed indicator to the total number of modes considered in the analysis. Next, this indicator is used as an objective function in a second stage to solve the inverse problem using SMA and MPA for damage quantification of the elements identified in the first stage. Experimental validation is conducted using a 3D frame structure with four stories that have damaged components. It is demonstrated that the proposed approach, using MSEcr and SMA, provides superior results for the considered structures. The effectiveness of this technique is tested by introducing a white Gaussian noise with different levels, namely 2% and 4%. The results show that the provided approach can predict the location and level of damage with high accuracy after introducing the noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

  2. Zou Y, Tong L, Steven GP (2000) Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures—a review. J Sound Vib 230(2):357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y-L (2014) New damage localization indicator based on curvature for single-span beams. Struct Eng Mech 51(6):1037–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rytter A (1993) Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures. Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University

  5. Yang Q, Liu J (2007) Structural damage identification based on residual force vector. J Sound Vib 305(1–2):298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiachacht S, Bouazzouni A, Khatir S, Wahab MA, Behtani A, Capozucca R (2018) Damage assessment in structures using combination of a modified Cornwell indicator and genetic algorithm. Eng Struct 177:421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capozucca R (2009) Static and dynamic response of damaged RC beams strengthened with NSM CFRP rods. Compos Struct 91(3):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cha YJ, Buyukozturk O (2015) Structural damage detection using modal strain energy and hybrid multiobjective optimization. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 30(5):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khatir S, Belaidi I, Serra R, Wahab MA, Khatir T (2015) Damage detection and localization in composite beam structures based on vibration analysis. Mechanics 21(6):472–479

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khatir S, Belaidi I, Khatir T, Hamrani A, Zhou Y-L, Abdel Wahab M (2017) Multiple damage detection in composite beams using Particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. Mechanika 23(4):514–521

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nobahari M, Seyedpoor SM (2013) An efficient method for structural damage localization based on the concepts of flexibility matrix and strain energy of a structure. Struct Eng Mech 46(2):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pandey A, Biswas M (1994) Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. J Sound Vib 169(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiachacht S, Bouazzouni A, Khatir S, Behtani A, Zhou Y-L-M, Wahab MA (2018) Structural health monitoring of 3D frame structures using finite element modal analysis and genetic algorithm. J Vibroeng 20(1):202–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Samir K, Brahim B, Capozucca R, Wahab MA (2018) Damage detection in CFRP composite beams based on vibration analysis using proper orthogonal decomposition method with radial basis functions and cuckoo search algorithm. Compos Struct 187:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zenzen R, Khatir S, Belaidi I, Le Thanh C, Wahab MA (2020) A modified transmissibility indicator and Artificial Neural Network for damage identification and quantification in laminated composite structures. Compos Struct 248:112497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang H, Kim C (2004) Damage detection in structures using a few frequency response measurements. J Sound Vib 270(1–2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohan S, Maiti DK, Maity D (2013) Structural damage assessment using FRF employing particle swarm optimization. Appl Math Comput 219(20):10387–10400

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuen MMF (1985) A numerical study of the eigenparameters of a damaged cantilever. J Sound Vib 103(3):301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Q (2009) A numerical technique for structural damage detection. Appl Math Comput 215(7):2775–2780

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2020) Multiverse optimizer for structural damage detection: Numerical study and experimental validation. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 29(13):e1777

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS, Noori M, Altabey WA (2020) Efficiency of grey wolf optimization algorithm for damage detection of skeletal structures via expanded mode shapes. Adv Struct Eng 23(13):2850–2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khatir S, Wahab MA, Boutchicha D, Khatir T (2019) Structural health monitoring using modal strain energy damage indicator coupled with teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm and isogoemetric analysis. J Sound Vib 448:230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khatir S, Dekemele K, Loccufier M, Khatir T, Wahab MA (2018) Crack identification method in beam-like structures using changes in experimentally measured frequencies and particle swarm optimization. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 346(2):110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khatir S, Wahab MA (2019) Fast simulations for solving fracture mechanics inverse problems using POD-RBF XIGA and Jaya algorithm. Eng Fract Mech 205:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khatir S, Tiachacht S, Thanh C-L, Bui TQ, Wahab MA (2019) Damage assessment in composite laminates using ANN-PSO-IGA and Cornwell indicator. Compos Struct 230:111509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2021) An effective method for damage assessment based on limited measured locations in skeletal structures. Advances in Structural Engineering 24(1):183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2019) Structural damage detection based on MAC flexibility and frequency using moth-flame algorithm. Struct Eng Mech 70(6):649–659

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2019) Data-driven method of damage detection using sparse sensors installation by SEREPa. J Civ Struct Health Monit 9(4):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghannadi P, Kourehli SS (2019) Model updating and damage detection in multi-story shear frames using Salp swarm algorithm. Earthq Struct 17(1):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li S, Chen H, Wang M, Heidari AA, Mirjalili S (2020) Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization. Future Gener Comput Syst 111:300–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH (2020) Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl 152:113377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shahri AH, Ghorbani-Tanha A (2017) Damage detection via closed-form sensitivity matrix of modal kinetic energy change ratio. J Sound Vib 401:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin J-F, Wang J, Wang L-X, Law S-S (2019) Structural damage diagnosis-oriented impulse response function estimation under seismic excitations. Sensors 19(24):5413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chatzis MN, Chatzi EN, Smyth AW (2015) An experimental validation of time domain system identification methods with fusion of heterogeneous data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(4):523–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Azam SE, Chatzi E, Papadimitriou C, Smyth A (2017) Experimental validation of the Kalman-type filters for online and real-time state and input estimation. J Vib Control 23(15):2494–2519

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Mechanics, Structure and Energetics (LMSE), Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou, B.P. N° 17 RP, 15000, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria

    Samir Tiachacht

  2. Soete Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 903, 9052, Zwijnaarde, Belgium

    Samir Khatir

  3. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Samir Khatir & Cuong Le Thanh

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India

    Ravipudi Venkata Rao

  5. Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Optimisation, Torrens University Australia, Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Seyedali Mirjalili

  6. Yonsei Frontier Lab, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

    Seyedali Mirjalili

  7. Division of Computational Mechanics, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Magd Abdel Wahab

  8. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Magd Abdel Wahab

Authors
  1. Samir Tiachacht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samir Khatir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cuong Le Thanh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ravipudi Venkata Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seyedali Mirjalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Magd Abdel Wahab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magd Abdel Wahab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiachacht, S., Khatir, S., Thanh, C.L. et al. Inverse problem for dynamic structural health monitoring based on slime mould algorithm. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 3), 2205–2228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01378-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01378-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation