A method of step-by-step packing and its application in generating 3D microstructures of polycrystalline and composite materials

Engineering with Computers volume 37, pages241–250(2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Micromechanical simulations with an explicit account of the material microstructure provide valuable information on the microscale stress and strain distributions under loading. The construction of 3D microstructure models reproducing realistic microstructure morphology is a challenging task of computational mechanics and materials science. In this paper, a semi-analytical method of step-by-step packing to construct 3D microstructure models of polycrystalline and composite materials is presented. The main idea of the method is to pack a pre-meshed volume with 3D microstructure elements in a stepwise fashion in accordance with a set of geometrical-based algorithms specific for each type of the microstructure. The seed distributions and growth laws are the main parameters controlling the microstructural patterns. It is shown in particular examples that using different growth laws and seed distributions as well as their various combinations it is possible to construct 3D microstructure models with a wide variety of geometrical features. Some aspects of the numerical implementation not addressed before are given in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Qing H (2015) The influence of particle shapes on strength and damage properties of metal matrix composites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:5741–5748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gao H (2006) Application of fracture mechanics concepts to hierarchical biomechanics of bone and bone-like materials. Int J Fract 138:101–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yadollahpour M, Hosseini-Toudeshky H (2017) Material properties and failure prediction of ultrafine grained materials with bimodal grain size distribution. Eng Comput 33:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 39:933–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ahmad FN, Jaafar M, Palaniandy S, Azizli KAM (2008) Effect of particle shape of silica mineral on the properties of epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sharkeev YP, Eroshenko AY, Kovalevskaya ZG et al (2016) Structural and phase state of Ti–Nb alloy at selective laser melting of the composite powder. Russ Phys J 59:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Balokhonov R, Zinoviev A, Romanova V, Zinovieva O (2016) The computational micromechanics of materials with porous ceramic coatings. Meccanica 51:415–428

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fliegener S, Kennerknecht T, Kabel M (2017) Investigations into the damage mechanisms of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene based on micro specimens and precise models of their microstructure. Compos Part B Eng 112:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Romanova VA, Balokhonov RR, Schmauder S (2009) The influence of the reinforcing particle shape and interface strength on the fracture behavior of a metal matrix composite. Acta Mater 57:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Diard O, Leclercq S, Rousselier G, Cailletaud G (2005) Evaluation of finite element based analysis of 3D multicrystalline aggregates plasticity. Application to crystal plasticity model identification and the study of stress and strain fields near grain boundaries. Int J Plast 21:691–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chawla N, Sidhu RS, Ganesh VV (2006) Three-dimensional visualization and microstructure-based modeling of deformation in particle-reinforced composites. Acta Mater 54:1541–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Diehl M, An D, Shanthraj P et al (2017) Crystal plasticity study on stress and strain partitioning in a measured 3D dual phase steel microstructure. Phys Mesomech 20:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Balokhonov RR, Romanova VA, Martynov SA et al (2016) A computational study of the microstructural effect on the deformation and fracture of friction stir welded aluminum. Comput Mater Sci 116:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Balokhonov R, Romanova V, Batukhtina E et al (2018) A numerical study of microscale plastic strain localization in friction stir weld zones. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 16:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jothi S, Croft TN, Brow SGR (2015) Modelling the influence of microstructural morphology and triple junctions on hydrogen transport in nanopolycrystalline nickel. Compos Part B Eng 75:104–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Węglewski W, Basista M, Manescu A et al (2014) Effect of grain size on thermal residual stresses and damage in sintered chromium–alumina composites: measurement and modeling. Compos Part B Eng 67:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Weglewski W, Bochenek K, Basista M et al (2013) Comparative assessment of Young’s modulus measurements of metal–ceramic composites using mechanical and non-destructive tests and micro-CT based computational modeling. Comput Mater Sci 77:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Anderson MP, Srolovitz DJ, Crest GS, Sahni PS (1984) Monte Carlo simulation of grain growth in textured metals. Acta Metall 32:783–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang Y, Zhou J, Shen TD et al (2012) Coupled effects of grain size and orientation on properties of nanocrystalline materials. Comput Mater Sci 58:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ghosh S, Nowak Z, Lee K (1997) Quantitative characterization and modeling of composite microstructures by Voronoi cells. Acta Mater 45:2215–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tran Ph, Ngo TD, Ghazlan A, Hui D (2017) Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings. Compos Part B Eng 108:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vajragupta N, Ahmed S, Boeff M et al (2017) Micromechanical modeling approach to derive the yield surface for BCC and FCC steels using statistically informed microstructure models and nonlocal crystal plasticity. Phys Mesomech 20:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zinovieva O, Zinoviev A, Ploshikhin V et al (2015) A solution to the problem of the mesh anisotropy in cellular automata simulations of grain growth. Comput Mater Sci 108:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Geiger J, Roósz A, Barkóczy P (2001) Simulation of grain coarsening in two dimensions by cellular-automaton. Acta Mater 49:623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zinoviev A, Zinovieva O, Ploshikhin V et al (2016) Evolution of grain structure during laser additive manufacturing. Simulation by a cellular automata method. Mater. Des. 106:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Song J-H, Fu Y, Kim T-Y, Yoon Y-Ch, Michopoulos JG, Rabczuk T (2018) Phase field simulations of coupled microstructure solidification problems via the strong form particle difference method. Int J Mech Mater Des 14:491–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Khalevitsky YuV, Konovalov AV (2018) A gravitational approach to modeling the representative volume geometry of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0649-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ramin B, Yichi Zh, Xiaolin L et al (2018) Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: review of the state-of-the-art techniques. Progr Mater Sci 95:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bargmann S, Klusemann B, Markmann J et al (2018) Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review. Progr Mater Sci 96:322–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Romanova V, Balokhonov R, Makarov P et al (2003) Simulation of elasto-plastic behavior of an artificial 3D-structure under dynamic loading. Comput Mater Sci 28:518–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Romanova VA, Soppa E, Schmauder S, Balokhonov R (2005) Mesomechanical analysis of the elasto-plastic behavior of a 3D composite-structure under tension. Comput Mech 36:475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Romanova VA, Balokhonov RR (2012) Numerical analysis of mesoscale surface roughening in a coated plate. Comput Mater Sci 61:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Balokhonov RR, Romanova VA, Panin AV, Kazachenok MS (2017) Computational mesomechanics of titanium surface-hardened by ultrasonic treatment. Phys Mesomech 20:334–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Romanova V, Balokhonov R, Schmauder S (2011) Three-dimensional analysis of mesoscale deformation phenomena in welded low-carbon steel. Mater Sci Eng A 528:5271–5277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Romanova V, Balokhonov R, Makarov P (2006) Three-dimensional simulation of fracture behavior of elastic-brittle material with initial crack pattern. Int J Fract 139:537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hansen GA, Douglass RW, Zardecki A (2005) Mesh enhancement. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fish J, Belytschko T (2007) A first course in finite elements. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Panin AV, Kazachenok MS, Romanova VA, Balokhonov RR, Kozelskaya AI, Sinyakova EA, Krukovskii KV (2018) Strain-induced surface roughening in polycrystalline VT1-0 titanium specimens under uniaxial tension. Phys Mesomech 21:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kovalevskaya ZG, Ivanov YF, Perevalova OB et al (2013) Study of microstructure of surface layers of low-carbon steel after turning and ultrasonic finishing. Phys Met Metallogr 114:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Brandt M (2017) Laser additive manufacturing: materials, Design, technologies, and applications. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation through the Grant no. 18-19-00273.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Akademicheskii Pr. 2/4, Tomsk, 534055, Russia

    V. Romanova & R. Balokhonov

Authors
  1. V. Romanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Balokhonov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Romanova.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romanova, V., Balokhonov, R. A method of step-by-step packing and its application in generating 3D microstructures of polycrystalline and composite materials. Engineering with Computers 37, 241–250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00820-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Composites
  • Polycrystals
  • 3D microstructure generation
  • Micromechanical simulations