Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using mesh-geometry relationships to transfer analysis models between CAE tools

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrating analysis and design models is a complex task due to differences between the models and the architectures of the toolsets used to create them. This complexity is increased with the use of many different tools for specific tasks during an analysis process. In this work various design and analysis models are linked throughout the design lifecycle, allowing them to be moved between packages in a way not currently available. Three technologies named Cellular Modeling, Virtual Topology and Equivalencing are combined to demonstrate how different finite element meshes generated on abstract analysis geometries can be linked to their original geometry. Cellular models allow interfaces between adjacent cells to be extracted and exploited to transfer analysis attributes such as mesh associativity or boundary conditions between equivalent model representations. Virtual Topology descriptions used for geometry clean-up operations are explicitly stored so they can be reused by downstream applications. Establishing the equivalence relationships between models enables analysts to utilize multiple packages for specialist tasks without worrying about compatibility issues or substantial rework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arabashi SD, Barton C, Shaw NK (1993) Steps towards cad-fea integration. Eng Comput 9(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beall MW, Shephard MS (2003) Accessing CAD geometry for mesh generation. In: 12th international meshing roundtable, Santa Fe

  3. Cavalcanti PR, Carvalho PC, Martha LF (1997) Non-manifold modeling: an approach based on spatial subdivision. Comput Aided Des 29(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaghy R, McCune W, Bridgett S, Armstrong CG, Robinson DJ, McKeag RM (1996) Dimensional reduction of analysis models. In Proceedings of the 5th international meshing roundtable

  5. Harlin G (2013) Engineering value of simulation process and data-management applied to aero engine design. In Nafems World Congress, Salzburg

  6. Lee JY, Lee JH, Kim H, Kim HS (2004) A Cellular topology-based approach to generating progressive solid models from feature-centric models. Comput Aided Des 36(3):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SH (2005) A CAD-CAE integration approach using feature based multi-resolution and multi-abstraction modeling techniques. Comput Aided Design 37:941–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makem JE, Armstrong CG, Robinson TT (2012) Automatic decomposition and efficient semi-structured meshing of complex solids. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-012-0302-x

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nolan DC, Tierney CM, Armstrong CG, Robinson TT, Makem JE (2013) Automatic dimensional reduction and meshing of stiffened thin-wall structures. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-013-0317-2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nolan DC, Tierney CM, Armstrong CG, Robinson TT (2013) Automating analysis modelling though the use of Simulation Intent, 2013. In: Paper presented at NAFEM World Congress, Salzburg, Austria

  11. Owen SJ, Shepherd JF (2009) Embedding features in a Cartesian grid. In 18th international roundtable, Salt Lake City

  12. Owen SJ, Cannan SA, Saigal S (1997) Pyramid elements for maintaining tetrahedra to hexahedra conformity. ASME, USA, pp 123–129

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson TT, Armstrong CG, Fairey R (2011) Automated mixed dimensional modeling from 2d and 3d cad models. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(2):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheffer A, Blacker T, Bercovier M (2000) Virtual topology operators for meshing. Int J Comput Geomet Appl 10(3):309–331

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Shephard MS, Beall MW, O’Bara RM, Webster BE (2004) Toward simulation-based design. Finite Elem Anal Des 1575–1598

  16. Sypkens Smit M, Bronsvoort WF (2009) Integration of design and analysis models. Comput Aided Des Appl 795–808

  17. M SypkensSmit, Bronsvoort WF (2009) Efficient tetrahedral remeshing of feature models for finite element analysis. Eng Comput 25:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thakur A, Banerjee AG, Gupta SK (2009) A survey of CAD model simplification techniques for physics-based simulation applications. Comput Aided Des 41:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tierney CM, Nolan DC, Robinson TT, Armstrong CG (2014) Managing equivalent representations of design and analysis models. Comput Aided Des Appl 11(2):193–205. doi:10.1080/16864360.2014.846091

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weiler K (1988) The radial edge structure. In Geometric modeling for CAD applications, North-Holland, pp 3–36

  21. White D, Saigal S (2002) Improved imprint and merge for conformal meshing. In 11th international meshing roundtable, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, BT9 5AH, Belfast, UK

    Christopher Tierney, Declan Nolan, Trevor Robinson & Cecil Armstrong

Authors
  1. Christopher Tierney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Declan Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Trevor Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cecil Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Tierney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tierney, C., Nolan, D., Robinson, T. et al. Using mesh-geometry relationships to transfer analysis models between CAE tools. Engineering with Computers 31, 465–481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-014-0377-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-014-0377-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation