Engineering with Computers

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

A collaborative benchmarking framework for multibody system dynamics

  • Manuel González
  • Francisco González
  • Alberto Luaces
  • Javier Cuadrado
Original Article

Abstract

Despite the importance given to the computational efficiency of multibody system (MBS) simulation tools, there is a lack of standard benchmarks to measure the performance of these kinds of numerical simulations. This works proposes a collaborative benchmarking framework to measure and compare the performance of different MBS simulation methods. The framework is made up of two main components: (a) an on-line repository of test problems with reference solutions and standardized procedures to measure computational efficiency and (b) a prototype implementation of a collaborative web-based application to collect, organize and share information about performance results in an intuitive and graphical form. The proposed benchmarking framework has been tested to evaluate the performance of a commercial MBS simulation software, and it proved to be an effective tool to collect and analyze information about the numerous factors which affect the computational efficiency of dynamic simulations of multibody systems.

Keywords

Multibody dynamics Simulation Performance Efficiency Benchmark Web-based system 

References

  1. 1.
    García de Jalón J, Bayo E (1994) Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems - the real-time challenge. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bae DS, Lee JK, Cho HJ, Yae H (2000) An explicit integration method for realtime simulation of multibody vehicle models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187:337–350MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson KS, Critchley JH (2003) Improved ‘Order-N’ performance algorithm for the simulation of constrained multi-rigid-body dynamic systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 9:185–212MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson K, Mukherjee R, Critchley J, Ziegler J, Lipton S (2007) POEMS: parallelizable open-source efficient multibody software. Eng Comput 23:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzalez M, Gonzalez F, Dopico D, Luaces A (2008) On the effect of linear algebra implementations in real-time multibody system dynamics. Comput Mech 41:607–615MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez M, Dopico D, Lugrís U, Cuadrado J (2006) A benchmarking system for MBS simulation software: problem standardization and performance measurement. Multibody Syst Dyn 16:179–190MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cuadrado J, Cardenal J, Morer P (1997) Modeling and solution methods for efficient real-time simulation of multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 1:259–280MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuadrado J, Cardenal J, Morer P, Bayo E (2000) Intelligent simulation of multibody dynamics: space-state and descriptor methods in sequential and parallel computing environments. Multibody Syst Dyn 4:55–73MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hairer E, Nørsett SP, Wanner G (1987) Solving ordinary differential equations I. Nonstiff problems. Springer-Verlag, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hairer E, Wanner G (1991) Solving ordinary differential equations II. Stiff and differential-algebraic problems. Springer-Verlag, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becker C, Kilian S, Turek S (1999) Consequences of modern hardware design for numerical simulations and their realization in FEAST, Euro-Par’99, Parallel Processing. In: Proceedings of the 5th international Euro-Par conference. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1685. pp 643–650Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eichberger A, Fuhrer C, Schwertassek R (1993) The benefits of parallel multibody simulation and its application to vehicle dynamics. In: Advanced multibody system dynamics: simulation and software tools. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 107–126Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quaranta G, Masarati P, Mantegazza P (2002) Multibody analysis of controlled aeroelastic systems on parallel computers. Multibody Syst Dyn 8:71–102MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duan S, Anderson KS (2000) Parallel implementation of a low order algorithm for dynamics of multibody systems on a distributed memory computing system. Eng Comput 16:96–108MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glesner M, Kirschbaum A, Renner FM, Voss B (2002) State-of-the-art in rapid prototyping for mechatronic systems. Mechatronics 12:987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arnold M, Burgermeister B, Eichberger A (2007) Linearly implicit time integration methods in real-time applications: DAEs and stiff ODEs. Multibody Syst Dyn 17:99–117MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MSC.Software Corporation (2004) ADAMS. http://www.mscsoftware.com/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel González
    • 1
  • Francisco González
    • 1
  • Alberto Luaces
    • 1
  • Javier Cuadrado
    • 1
  1. 1.Escuela Politécnica SuperiorUniversidad de A CoruñaFerrolSpain

Personalised recommendations