Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior alternatives with informative early stopping

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 August 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

It is standard Bayesian practice that when more data become available, the posterior distribution is updated with new information and the posterior becomes the prior for the next posterior analysis. It is also standard Bayesian philosophy that an analysis be performed on the experiment that was actually run, and not on experiments that might have been run. Yet in experiments with informative interim stopping decisions, standard practice is not to condition the sampling density on interim decisions that are made. The consequence is that the likelihood is invariant to the decision. Information about the decision is not utilized. We examine the consequences of conditioning the sampling density on the interim decision for subsequent posterior analyses in the context of a two-stage design with an early stopping option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Wolpert R (1988) The likelihood principle (second edition). Institute of Mathematical Statistics. Lecture notes: Monographs Series, Institute of Mathematical Statistics. https://books.google.com/books?id=7fz8JGLmWbgC

  • Berry D, Ho C (1988) One-sided sequential stopping boundaries for clinical trials: a decision-theoretic approach. Biometrics 44(1):219–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531909

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum A (1962) On the foundations of statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 57(298):269–306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Tiao GC (2011) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casella G, Berger R (2002) Statistical inference, 2nd edn. Duxberry advanced series. Cengage Learning, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield J (1966) Sequential trials, sequential analysis and the likelihood principle. Am Stat 20(2):18–23

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B et al (1975) Defining the curvature of a statistical problem (with applications to second order efficiency). Ann Stat 3(6):1189–1242

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD (1975) Sufficiency and conditionality. Biometrika 62(2):251–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Little RJ (2012) Calibrated Bayes, an alternative inferential paradigm for official statistics. J Off Stat 28(3):309

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Hall W (1999) Unbiased estimation following a group sequential test. Biometrika 86(1):71–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Hall W, Yu KF et al (2006) Estimation following a group sequential test for distributions in the one-parameter exponential family. Stat Sin 16(1):165–181

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner IC (2021) A general framework for the analysis of adaptive experiments. Stat Sci 36(3):465–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo M (2021) Revisit to the likelihood principle. Ann Jpn Assoc Philos Sci 30:67–84

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DG (2009) An error in the argument from conditionality and sufficiency to the likelihood principle. In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds) Error and Inference: recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science Cambridge University Press pp. 305

  • Molenberghs G, Kenward MG, Aerts M et al (2014) On random sample size, ignorability, ancillarity, completeness, separability, and degeneracy: sequential trials, random sample sizes, and missing data. Stat Methods Med Res 23(1):11–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock SJ (1977) Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Biometrika 64(2):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner GL, Laud PW, Johnson WO (2021) Bayesian thinking in biostatistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tarima S, Flournoy N (2022a) The cost of sequential adaptation and the lower bound for mean squared error. arXiv:2209.02436

  • Tarima S, Flournoy N (2022b) Most powerful test sequences with early stopping options. Metrika 85(4):491–513

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Flournoy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The figure 1 caption is corrected. The bad breaks of the words and sentences are corrected.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flournoy, N., Tarima, S. Posterior alternatives with informative early stopping. Stat Papers 64, 1329–1341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-023-01429-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-023-01429-w

Keywords

Navigation