Abstract
In this paper, we show that the likelihood-ratio measure (a) is invariant with respect to dominating sigma-finite measures, (b) satisfies logical consequences which are not satisfied by standard p values, (c) respects frequentist properties, i.e., the type I error can be properly controlled, and, under mild regularity conditions, (d) can be used as an upper bound for posterior probabilities. We also discuss a generic application to test whether the genotype frequencies of a given population are under the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, under inbreeding restrictions or under outbreeding restrictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bickel DR (2012) The strength of statistical evidence for composite hypotheses: inference to the best explanation. Stat Sin 22:1147–1198
Birkes D (1990) Generalized likelihood ratio tests and uniformly most powerful tests. Am Stat 44:163–166
Blume JD (2008) Tutorial in biostatistics: likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence. Stat Med 21:2563–2599
Chernoff H (1954) On the distribution of the likelihood ratio. Ann Math Stat 25:573–578
Denneberg D (1994) Non-additive measure and integral, theory and decision library (Series B mathematical and statistical methods), vol 27. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Drton M (2009) Likelihood ratio tests and singularities. Ann Stat 37:979–1012
Emigh TH (1980) A comparison of tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Biometrics 36:627–642
Giang PH, Shenoy PP (2005) Decision making on the sole basis of statistical likelihood. Artif Intell 165:137–163
Gonçalves FB, Franklin P (2021) On the definition of likelihood function, arXiv:1906.10733
Graffelman J, Weir B (2016) Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at biallelic genetic markers on the X chromosome. Heredity 116:558–568
Hacking I (1965) Logic of statistical inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hartigan JA (1998) The maximum likelihood prior. Ann Stat 26:2083–2103
Karlin S, Rubin H (1956) The theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio. Ann Math Stat 27:272–299
Lindley DV (1988) Statistical inference concerning Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In: Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 307–326
Mudholkar GS, Chaubey YP (2009) On defining p values. Stat Probab Lett 79:1963–1971
Neyman J, Pearson ES (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 231:289–337
Patriota AG (2013) A classical measure of evidence for general null hypotheses. Fuzzy Sets Syst 233:74–88
Patriota AG (2017) On some assumptions of the null hypothesis statistical testing. Educ Psychol Meas 77:507–528
Patriota AG, Alves JO (2021) A monotone frequentist measure of evidence for testing variance components in linear mixed models. J Stat Plan Inference 219:43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2021.11.002
Puhalskii A (2001) Large deviations and idempotent probability, Monographs and surveys in pure and applied mathematics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Puig X, Ginebra J, Graffelman J (2017) A Bayesian test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of biallelic X-chromosomal markers. Heredity 119:226–236
Royall R (1997) Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. CRC Press, New York
Royall R (2000) On the probability of observing misleading statistical. J Am Stat Assoc 95:760–768
Severini TA (2000) Likelihood methods in statistics, vol 22. Oxford Statistical Science Series, New York
Schervish MJ (1996) P values: what they are and what they are not. Am Stat 50:203–206
Shoemaker J, Painter I, Weir BS (1998) A bayesian characterization of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium. Genetics 149:2079–2088
Sprott DA (2000) Statistical inference in science. Springer, New York
Vu HTV, Zhou S (1997) Generalization of likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Ann Stat 25:897–916
Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28
Acknowledgements
This work received Grants from FAPESP–Brazil (2014/25595-0) and CNPq (200115/2015-4). This paper was partially developed in the Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Canada, and in the Department of Statistics, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patriota, A.G. A measure of evidence based on the likelihood-ratio statistics. Stat Papers 63, 1931–1951 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01301-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01301-3