Estimation of volatility causality in structural autoregressions with heteroskedasticity using independent component analysis

Regular Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we developed a new statistical procedure to identify and estimate both the causal effects and the volatility structure in multivariate time series using structural autoregressions with heteroskedasticity (SVAR–GARCH) model. Specifically, using a recent method based on independent component analysis (ICA), we could simultaneously identify the causality and decompose the error terms into non-Gaussian independent components. We then used univariate GARCH to model the volatility of each independent component. The structure of volatility transmission along the SVAR model then was modeled using volatility impulse response function (VIRF) to independent component shocks. Simulation results were given to verify the effectiveness of the procedure. Empirically, we investigated the intraday volatility transmission effect along the US Treasury curve, based on high-frequency CME bond futures data. The result validated the general belief that intraday volatility transmission is a function of liquidity and maturity along the yield curve.

Keywords

ICA GARCH SVAR Volatility causality 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62M10 62P20 

References

  1. Alexander C (2001) A primer on the orthogonal GARCH model. ISMA Centre, The Business School for Financial Markets, University of Reading Working paperGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen T, Davis R, Kreiss JP, Mikosch T (2009) Handbook of financial time series. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayuso J, Haldane A, Restoy F (1997) Volatility transmission along the money market yield curve. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133:56–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomberg LP (2015) Intraday prices for CME Treasury Futures, 15 Sept 2015–15 Dec 2015. Retrieved 16 Dec 2015 from Bloomberg databaseGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31:307–327MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollerslev T (1990) Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. Rev Econ Stat 72:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boscher H, Fronk EM, Pigeot I (2000) Forecasting interest rates volatilities by GARCH (1,1) and stochastic volatility models. Stat Pap 41(4):409. doi: 10.1007/BF02925760 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Härdle W, Spokoiny V (2010) GHICA-Risk analysis with GH distributions and independent components. J Empir Financ 17(2):255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen RB, Chen Y, Härdle WK (2014) TVICA-Time varying independent component analysis and its application to financial data. Comput Stat Data Anal 74:95–109MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curto JD, Pinto JC, Tavares GN (2007) Modeling stock markets’ volatility using GARCH models with Normal, Student’s t and stable Paretian distributions. Stat Pap 50(2):311. doi: 10.1007/s00362-007-0080-5 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1007MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Engle R (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 20:339–350MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engle RF, Kroner KF (1995) Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econ Theory 11:122–150MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. García-Ferrer A, González-Prieto E, Peña D (2012) A conditionally heteroskedastic independent factor model with an application to financial stock returns. Int J Forecast 28:70–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyvärinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 13(4):411–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyvärinen A, Zhang K, Shimizu S, Hoyer PO (2010) Estimation of a structural vector autoregression model using non-gaussianity. J Mach Learn Res 11:1709–1731. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1756006.1859907
  17. Kuhn H (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Nav Res Logist Q 2(1–2):83–97MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Laurent S, Bauwens L, Rombouts JVK (2006) Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. J Appl Econ 21:79–109MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin WL (1997) Impulse response function for conditional volatility in GARCH models. J Bus Econ Stat 15:15–25MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. MATLAB (2015) version 8.5.0.197613 (R2015b). The MathWorks Inc., NatickGoogle Scholar
  21. Perignon C, Smith DR (2007) Yield-factor volatility models. J Bank Financ 31:3125–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimizu S, Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A, Kerminen A (2006) A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J Mach Learn Res 7:2003–2030. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1248547.1248619
  23. Tsay RS (2005) Analysis of financial time series, vol 2, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu E, Yu P, Li W (2006) Value at risk estimation using independent component analysis-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ICA-garch) models. Int J Neural Syst 16(05):371–382. doi: 10.1142/S0129065706000779. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/82886

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics & Applied Probability, Faculty of ScienceNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations