Abstract
Consider \(k\) (\(\ge \)2) exponential populations having unknown guarantee times and known (possibly unequal) failure rates. For selecting the unknown population having the largest guarantee time, with samples of (possibly) unequal sizes from the \(k\) populations, we consider a class of selection rules based on natural estimators of the guarantee times. We deal with the problem of estimating the guarantee time of the population selected, using a fixed selection rule from this class, under the squared error loss function. The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) is derived. We also consider two other natural estimators \(\varphi _{N,1}\) and \(\varphi _{N,2}\) which are, respectively, based on the maximum likelihood estimators and UMVUEs for component problems. The estimator \(\varphi _{N,2}\) is shown to be generalized Bayes. We further show that the UMVUE and the natural estimator \(\varphi _{N,1}\) are inadmissible and are dominated by the natural estimator \(\varphi _{N,2}\). A simulation study on the performance of various estimators is also reported.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abughalous MM, Bansal NK (1994) On the problem of selecting the best population in life testing models. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 23(5):1471–1481
Abughalous MM, Miescke KJ (1989) On selecting the largest success probability with unequal sample sizes. J Stat Plan Inference 21(1):53–68
Arshad, M. and Misra, N. (2014). Selecting the exponential population having the larger guarantee time with unequal sample sizes. Commun Stat-Theory Methods (To appear)
Arshad M, Misra N, Vellaisamy P (2014) Estimation after selection from gamma populations with unequal known shape parameters. J Stat Theory Pract. doi:10.1080/15598608.2014.912601 (To appear)
Bahadur RR, Goodman LA (1952) Impartial decision rules and sufficient statistics. Ann Math Stat 23:553–562
Brewster JF, Zidek ZV (1974) Improving on equivarient estimators. Ann Stat 2:21–38
Cohen A, Sackrowitz HB (1982) Estimating the mean of the selected population. Statistical decision theory and related topics-III, vol 1. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 243–270
Cohen A, Sackrowitz HB (1988) A decision theory formulation for population selection followed by estimating the mean of the selected population. Statistical decision theory and related topics-IV, vol 2. Springer, New York, pp 33–36
Dahiya RC (1974) Estimation of the mean of the selected population. J Am Stat Assoc 69:226–230
Eaton ML (1967) Some optimum properties of ranking procedures. Ann Math Stat 38:124–137
Gangopadhyay AK, Kumar S (2005) Estimating average worth of the selected subset from two-parameter exponential populations. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 34(12):2257–2267
Gupta SS, Panchapakesan S (2002) Multiple decision procedures: theory and methodology of selecting and ranking populations. SIAM (Classics in Applied Mathematics)
Kumar S, Mahapatra AK, Vellaisamy P (2009) Reliability estimation of the selected exponential populations. Stat Probab Lett 79:1372–1377
Liese F, Miescke Klaus-J (2008) Statistical decision theory: estimation testing and selection. Springer, New York
Misra N, Anand R, Singh H (1998) Estimation after subset selection from exponential populations: location parameter case. Am J Math Manag Sci 18(3–4):291–326
Misra N, Arshad M (2014) Selecting the best of two gamma populations having unequal shape parameters. Stat Methodol 18:41–63
Misra N, Dhariyal ID (1994) Non-minimaxity of natural decision rules under heteroscedasticity. Stat Decis 12:79–89
Misra N, Singh GN (1993) On the UMVUE for estimating the parameter of the selected exponential population. J Indian Stat Assoc 31:61–69
Misra N, van der Meulen EC, Branden KV (2006a) On estimating the scale parameter of the selected gamma population under the scale invariant squared error loss function. J Comput Appl Math 186:268–282
Misra N, van der Meulen EC, Branden KV (2006b) On some inadmissibility results for the scale parameters of the selected gamma populations. J Stat Plan Inference 136(7):2340–2351
Nematollahi N, Motamed-Shariati F (2009) Estimation of the scale parameter of the selected gamma population under the entropy loss function. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 38(2):208–221
Nematollahi N, Motamed-Shariati F (2012) Estimation of the parameter of the selected uniform population under the entropy loss function. J Stat Plan Inference 142(7):2190–2202
Putter J, Rubinstein D (1968) On estimating the mean of a selected population. Technical Report No. 165, University of Wisconsin
Risko KJ (1985) Selecting the better binomial population with unequal sample sizes. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 14(1):123–158
Sackrowitz HB, Samul-Cahn E (1984) Estimation of the mean of a selected population. Technical Report No. 165, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin
Sackrowitz HB, Samul-Cahn E (1986) Evaluating the chosen population: a Bayes and minimax approach. Adaptive statistical procedures and related topics, IMS Lecture Notes- Monograph Series 8:386–399
Sarkadi K (1967) Estimation after selection. Studia Sci Math Hung 2:341–350
Stallard N, Todd S, Whitehead J (2008) Estimation following selection of the largest of two normal means. J Stat Plan Inference 138(6):1629–1638
Vellaisamy P (1992) Inadmissibility results for the selected scale parameter. Ann Stat 20:2183–2191
Vellaisamy P (1996) A note on the estimation of the selected scale parameters. J Stat Plan Inference 55(1):39–46
Vellaisamy P (2009) A note on unbiased estimation following selection. Stat Methodol 6(4):389–396
Vellaisamy P, Al-Mosawi R (2010) Simultaneous estimation of Poisson means of the selected subset. J Stat Plan Inference 140(11):3355–3364
Vellaisamy P, Punnen AP (2002) Improved estimators for the selected location parameters. Stat Pap 43:291–299
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arshad, M., Misra, N. Estimation after selection from exponential populations with unequal scale parameters. Stat Papers 57, 605–621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-015-0670-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-015-0670-6
Keywords
- Estimation after selection
- Inadmissible estimators
- Location parameter
- Squared error loss function
- UMVU estimator