Abstract
This paper proposes a Kalman filter formulation for parameter estimation of doubly stochastic Poisson processes (DSPP) with stochastic affine intensities. To achieve this aim, an analytical expression for the probability distribution functions of the corresponding DSPP for any intensity from the class of affine diffusions is obtained. More detailed results are provided for one and twofactor Feller and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck diffusions. A Monte Carlo study indicates that the proposed method is a reliable procedure for moderate sample sizes. An empirical analysis of one and twofactor Feller and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck models is carried out using high frequency transaction data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
A stiff equation is a differential equation for which certain numerical methods for solving the equation are numerically unstable, unless the step size is taken to be extremely small. It has proven difficult to formulate a precise definition of stiffness, but the main idea is that the equation includes some terms that can lead to rapid variation in the solution.
The estimation procedure and the Kalman filter algorithm were implemented in this work in accordance with Bolder (2001)
We have described the intensity by \(\lambda (\mathbf X(t))\) as a way to make explicit the role played by the state variable \(X(t)\), now we simplify this cumbersome notation to \(\lambda (t)\).
A comparison among different approximation to the noncentral chisquare can be found at Johnson and Kotz (1970).
BM&FBOVESPA is the fourth largest exchange in the word in terms of market capitalization. This exchange has a vertically integrated business model with a trade platform and clearing for equities, derivatives and cash market for currency, government and private bonds.
Ticker: FUT DOLX08.
Here # stands for the number of arrivals within the given time interval.
Definition and properties of the trustregionreflective algorithm can be found in Byrd (1987).
Generally speaking, two models, say \(H_f\) and \(H_g\), are said to be nonnested if it is not possible to derive \(H_f\) (or \(H_g\)) from the other model either by means of exact set of parametric restrictions or as a result of a limiting process.
References
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information theory, pp 267–281
Albanese C, Lawi S (2004) Laplace transforms for integrals of markov processes. Markov Process Rel Fields 11:677–724
Basu S, Dassios A (2002) A cox process with lognormal intensity. Insur Math Econ 31:297–302
Bielecki TR, Rutkowski M (2002) Credit risk: modeling, valuation and hedging. Springer, Berlin
Bolder DJ (2001) Yield curve modelling at the bank of Canada. Bank of Canada working paper 2001–2015
Bollerslev T, Wooldridge JM (1992) Quasimaximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with timevarying covariances. Econ Rev 11:143–172
Bouzas PR, Valderrama MJ, Aguilera AM (2002) Forecasting a class of doubly Poisson processes. Stat Pap 43:507–523
Bouzas PR, Valderrama MJ, Aguilera AM (2006) On the characteristic functional of a doubly stochastic poisson process: application to a narrowband process. Appl Math Model 30:1021–1032
Bouzas PR, RuizFuentes N, Mantilla A, Valderrama MJ, Aguilera AM (2010) A Cox model for radioactive counting measure: inference on the intensity process. Chemometr Intell Lab 103:116–121
Brémaud P (1972) Point processes and queues: martingale dynamics. Springer, New York
Breusch TS (1979) Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Aust Econ Pap 17:334–355
Byrd RH, Schnabel RB, Schultz GA (1987) A trust region algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization. SIAM J Numer Anal 24:1152–1170
Chen RR, Scott L (2003) Multifactor Cox–Ingersoll–Ross models of the term structure: estimates and tests from a Kalman filter model. J Real Estate Financ Econ 27:143–172
Cont R, Stoikov S, Talreja R (2010) A stochastic model for order book dynamics. Oper Res 10(3):549–563
Cox DR (1955) Some statistical methods connected with series of events. J R Stat Soc B 17:129–164
Cox J, Ingersoll J, Ross S (1985) A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53:385–408
Dalal S, McIntosh A (1994) When to stop testing for large software systems with changing code. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 20:318–323
Daley DJ, VereJones D (1988) An introduction to theory of point processes. Springer, New York
De Genaro A (2011) Cox processes with affine intensity. PhD. Thesis, Institute of Mathematics and StatisticsIME USP, Sao Paulo
Dassios A, Jang J (2003) Pricing of castrophe reinsurance and derivatives using the Cox process with shot noise intensity. Financ Stoch 7:73–95
Dassios A, Jang J (2008) The distribution of the interval between events of a cox process with shot noise intensity. J Appl Math Stoch Anal 2008:1–14
Dassios A, Jang J (2012) A double shotnoise process and its application in insurance. J Math Syst Sci 2:82–93
Duan J, Simonato J (1999) Estimating and testing exponentialaffine term structure models by kalman filter. Rev Quant Financ Acc 13:111–135
Duffie D, Pan J, Singleton K (2010) Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jumpdiffusions. Econometrica 68(6):1343–1376
Duffie D, Filipović D, Schachermayer W (2003) Affine processes and applications in finance. Ann Appl Probab 13:984–1053
Duffie D, Kan R (1996) A yieldfactor model of interest rates. Math Financ 6:379–406
Duffie D, Singleton K (1999) Modeling term structures defautable bonds. Rev Financ Stud 12:687–720
Dyrting S (2004) Evaluating the noncentral chisquare distribution for the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process. Comput Econ 24:35–50
Engle R, Russell J (1998) Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica 66:1127–1162
Engle R, Russell J (2000) The econometrics of ultrahighfrequency data. Econometrica 68–1:1–22
Feller W (1951) Two singular diffusion problems. Ann Math 54:173–182
Gail M, Santner T, Brown C (1980) An analysis of comparative carcinogenesis experiments based on multiple times to tumor. Biometrics 36:255–266
Geye A, Pichler S (1999) A statespace approach to estimate and test multifactor Cox–Ingersoll–Ross models of the term structure of interest rates. J Financ Res 22:107–130
Godfrey LG (1978) Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46:1293–1302
Grandell J (1976) Doubly stochastic process, 1st edn. Springer, New York
Grandell J (1991) Aspects of risk theory. Springer, New York
Grasselli M, Tebaldi C (2008) Solvable affine term structure models. Math Financ 18:135–153
Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Harvey A (1989) Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Johnson N, Kotz S (1970) Distributions in statistics: continuous univariate distributions, vol 2. Wiley, New York
Kallenberg O (1986) Random measures, 4th edn. Academic Press, London
Karatzas I, Shreve S (1991) Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Karlin S, Taylor H (1981) A second course in stochastic process. Academic Press, New York
Kozachenko YuV, Pogorilyak OO (2008) A method of modelling log Gaussian Cox process. Theory Probab Math Stat 77:91–105
Lando D (1998) On cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev Deriv Res 2:99–120
Ljung GM, Box G (1978) On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 62–2:297–303
Minozzo M, Centanni S (2012) Monte Carlo likelihood inference for marked doubly stochastic Poisson processes with intensity driven by marked point processes. Working Paper Series, Dept. Economics, University of Verona
Seal H (1983) The Poisson process: its failure in risk theory. Insur Math Econ 2–4:287–288. London: Croom Helm, 1979
Sankaran M (1963) Approximations to the noncentral chisquare distribution. Biometrika 50:199–204
Snyder D, Miller M (1991) Random point processes in time and space, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Vasicek O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J Financ Econ 5:177–188
Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypothesis. Econometrica 57:307–333
Wei G, Clifford P, Feng J (2002) Population death sequences and cox processes driven by interacting Feller diffusions. J Phys A Math Gen 35:9–31
Zhang T, Kou S (2010) Nonparametric inference of doubly stochastic Poisson process data via kernel method. Ann Appl Stat 4:1913–1941
Acknowledgments
Alan De Genaro would like to thank Marco Avellaneda, Jorge Zubelli, Cristiano Fernandes, Julio Stern, Peter Carr, Cris Rogers, Jean Pierre Fouque and seminar participants at NYUCourant, IMPA, FEA/USP, SUNY—Stony Brook for helpful comments. We also thank the three reviewers for their thorough review and highly appreciate the comments and suggestions, which significantly contributed to improving the quality of this paper. A special thank is due to Yuri Suhov for his invaluable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper circulated under the title doubly stochastic Poisson processes with affine intensities. The results of this paper are part of the first author’s Ph.D Thesis completed under supervision of the second author.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Proof of Result 2
To convey the spirit of proofs used for this kind of results, we give here a short demonstration. Substituting the form of processes \(\mathbf X(t)\), \({t \ge 0}\), and \(\lambda (t)\), \({t \ge 0}\), as in (3) and (2), we obtain:
Inserting \(F(\mathbf x,t)=e^{\alpha (t)+\beta (t)\cdot \mathbf x}\) into the PDE above and grouping the terms in \(\mathbf x\):
Where
Use the separation of variable technique to obtain that \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) satisfy a Ricatti equation with boundary condition \(\alpha (0)=0\) and \(\beta (0)=0\). \(\square \)
Appendix 2: Proof of Corollary 1 and 2
To obtain in a closedform the PDF of a DSPP with a given affine intensity, we need from Theorem 1 to solve:
The exact solution for each case can be obtained after replacing the appropriate parametrization:

1.
Feller intensity \(\mathbf {K_0} = \kappa \theta \), \(\mathbf {K_1} = \kappa \), \(\mathbf {a} = 0\) and \(\mathbf {b} = \sigma ^2\)

2.
O–U intensity \(\mathbf {K_0} = \kappa \theta \), \(\mathbf {K_1} = \kappa \), \(\mathbf {a} = \sigma ^2\) and \(\mathbf {b} = 0\)
on (57) and solving a Ricatti equation for \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) with boundary condition \(\alpha (0)=0\) e \(\beta (0)=0\).
As the multidimensional case is merely a sum of decoupled onedimensional solutions, its derivation is identical to described above.\(\square \)
Appendix 3: Conditions to existence of Laplace transform for \(\int \limits _t^T\lambda (t){\mathrm{d}}t\)
Without going into detail of the Albanese–Lawi result, we describe below the class of (scalar) processes introduced in Albanese and Lawi (2004). It consists of diffusions \(X(t)\), \(t \ge 0\), solving the following SDE:
Here \(A(x)\), \(R(x)\) and \(h(x)\) are secondorder polynomials and in addition:

1.
\(A(x)\) belongs to the set \(\{1,x,x(1x),x^2+1\}\) and \(R(X(t))\ge 0\);

2.
the function \(h(x)\) is a linear combination of hypergeometric functions of a confluent type \(_1F_1\) if \(A(x) \in \{1,x\}\) and of a Gaussian type \(_2F_1\) if \(A(x)\in \{x(1x),x^2+1\}\).
A hypergeometric function in its general form may be written as
For \(p \le q+1, \gamma _j \in \mathbb {C}\setminus \mathbb {Z}_+\) it can be represented by using Taylor’s expansion around \(z=0\):
As an example of application of the Albanese–Lawi, let the intensity process \(\lambda (t)\) follows a onedimensional Feller diffusion. To this end, assume that the polynomials \(A(x)\), \(h(x)\) and \(R(x)\) are defined as:
Substituting the polynomial into (58) and performing the change of parameters \(a=\kappa \theta /\sigma ^2\) and \(\kappa /\sigma ^2\) we conclude our example. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Genaro, A., Simonis, A. Estimating doubly stochastic Poisson process with affine intensities by Kalman filter. Stat Papers 56, 723–748 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0036201406066
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0036201406066