Statistical Papers

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 827–837 | Cite as

On a new interpretation of the sample variance

Regular Article

Abstract

It may not be an overstatement that one of the most widely reported measures of variation involves S2, the sample variance, which is also well-known to be alternatively expressed in the form of an U statistic with a symmetric kernel of degree 2 whatever be the population distribution function. We propose a very general new approach to construct unbiased estimators of a population variance by U statistics with symmetric kernels of degree higher than two. Surprisingly, all such estimators ultimately reduce to S2 (Theorem 3.1). While Theorem 3.1 is interesting and novel in its own right, it leads to a newer interpretation of S2 that is much broader than what is known in the statistical literature including economics, actuarial mathematics, and mathematical finance.

Keywords

Actuarial mathematics Economic theory Gini’s mean difference Mathematical finance Sample variance U statistics 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

62G05 62G99 62F10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ghosh M, Mukhopadhyay N, Sen PK (1997) Sequential estimation. Wiley, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gini C (1914) L’Ammontare la Composizione della Ricchezza delle Nazioni. Torino, BocaGoogle Scholar
  3. Gini C (1921) Measurement of inequality of incomes. Econ J 31: 124–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoeffding W (1948) A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Ann Math Stat 19: 293–325MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoeffding W (1961) The strong law of large numbers for U-statistics. Institute of Statistics mimeo series, no. 302. University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  6. Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. 2. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Jureckova J, Sen PK (1996) Robust statistical procedures: asymptotics and interrelations. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Korolyuk VS, Borovskich YuV (2009) Theory of U-statistics. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. Kowalski J, Tu XM (2007) Modern applied U-statistics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee AJ (1990) U-statistics. CRC Press, Boca RatonMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehmann EL (1983) Theory of point estimation. Wiley, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mukhopadhyay N, Chattopadhyay B (2011) Estimating a standard deviation with U-statistics of degree more than two: the normal case. J Stat Adv Theory Appl 5: 93–130MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukhopadhyay N, Solanky TKS (1994) Multistage selection and ranking procedures: second-order asymptotics. Dekker, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Nair US (1936) The standard error of Gini’s mean difference. Biometrika 28: 428–436MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Pal N, Ling C, Lin J-J (1998) Estimation of a normal variance—a critical review. Stat Pap 39: 389–404MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Puri ML, Sen PK (1971) Nonparametric methods in multivariate analysis. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Sen A (1997) On economic inequality, enlarged edition with a substantial annex by James Foster and Amartya Sen. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Sen PK (1981) Sequential nonparametrics: invariance principles and statistical inference. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Weba M (1993) Representations for bias and variance of the sample standard deviation. Stat Pap 34: 369–375MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations