Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology B

, Volume 189, Issue 1, pp 81–95 | Cite as

Ontogenetic changes in cutaneous and branchial ionocytes and morphology in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) larvae

  • Garfield T. Kwan
  • Jeanne B. WexlerEmail author
  • Nicholas C. WegnerEmail author
  • Martin TresguerresEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The development of osmoregulatory and gas exchange organs was studied in larval yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) from 2 to 25 days post-hatching (2.9–24.5 mm standard length, SL). Cutaneous and branchial ionocytes were identified using Na+/K+-ATPase immunostaining and scanning electron microscopy. Cutaneous ionocyte abundance significantly increased with SL, but a reduction in ionocyte size and density resulted in a significant decrease in relative ionocyte area. Cutaneous ionocytes in preflexion larvae had a wide apical opening with extended microvilli; however, microvilli retracted into an apical pit from flexion onward. Lamellae in the gill and pseudobranch were first detected ~ 3.3 mm SL. Ionocytes were always present on the gill arch, first appeared in the filaments and lamellae of the pseudobranch at 3.4 mm SL, and later in gill filaments at 4.2 mm SL, but were never observed in the gill lamellae. Unlike the cutaneous ionocytes, gill and pseudobranch ionocytes had a wide apical opening with extended microvilli throughout larval development. The interlamellar fusion, a specialized gill structure binding the lamellae of ram-ventilating fish, began forming by ~ 24.5 mm SL and contained ionocytes, a localization never before reported. Ionocytes were retained on the lamellar fusions and also found on the filament fusions of larger sub-adult yellowfin tuna; however, sub-adult gill ionocytes had apical pits. These results indicate a shift in gas exchange and NaCl secretion from the skin to branchial organs around the flexion stage, and reveal novel aspects of ionocyte localization and morphology in ram-ventilating fishes.

Keywords

Chloride cell Osmoregulation Fish larvae Mitochondrion-rich cell Ionocyte Gill morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. We are grateful to the technical staff of the Achotines Laboratory in Panama for their assistance with measurements and larval rearing of yellowfin tuna. We thank Daniel Margulies and Vernon Scholey of the IATTC for development of yellowfin rearing methods and supervision of the spawning and larval rearing at the Achotines Laboratory. The authors would like to thank Dr. Greg Rouse for the use of microscope and camera equipment, Sabine Faulhaber for technical assistance with the scanning electron microscope, Taylor Smith for her assistance in dissection and imaging, and Johnathan Evanilla and Dan Fuller for providing sub-adult yellowfin tuna samples. We also thank William Watson (Southwest Fisheries Science Center) and Alex Da-Silva (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission) for helpful review comments. Lastly, we thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft. G.T.K. was supported by the San Diego Fellowship and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This study followed all applicable institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

360_2018_1187_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (352 kb)
Supplementary material 1: Daily mean tank pH, intake pH, temperature (°C), dissolved O2 (mg/L), and salinity (ppt) throughout the yellowfin tuna larvae sampling period (JPG 351 KB)
360_2018_1187_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (219 kb)
Supplementary material 2: Western blot with anti-Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) monoclonal antibodies on sub-adult yellowfin tuna gill tissue yielded a single ~ 108 kDa band, which matches the predicted size of the protein. a NKA signal in the membrane fraction (MB) was significantly stronger (exposure time: 4 s) than b the crude homogenate (CH) and cytoplasm (CYT) fraction (exposure time: 304 s). This indicates NKA is present in the basolateral membrane as expected. Western blot method: gill samples were dissected from yellowfin tuna, immediately flash frozen in liquid N2, and kept at − 80 °C until processed. Frozen gill tissue was pulverized with porcelain mortar and pestle and mixed in an ice-cold protease inhibiting buffer (250 mmol L−1 sucrose, 1 mmol L−1 EDTA, 30 mmol L−1 Tris, 10 mmol L−1 benzamidine hydrochloride hydrate, 200 mmol L−1 phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mol L−1 dithiothreitol, pH 7.5). Debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation (3000×g for 10 min, 4 °C), and the resulting solution was saved as the crude homogenate fraction. A subset of the crude homogenate fraction was further subjected to a medium speed centrifugation (21130×g for 30 min, 4 °C), and the supernatant and membrane pellet was saved as the cytoplasmic fraction and the plasma membrane fraction, respectively. The total protein concentration of the three fractions was determined by Bradford protein assay, and 5 µg protein was combined with 2× Laemmli buffer (90%) and 2-mercapaethanol (10%). After heating at 70°C for 5 min, proteins were separated in 7.5% polyacrylamide mini gel (60 V 15 min, 200 V 45 min). Proteins were then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane using a wet transfer cell (90 mA 8 h) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After transfer, the PVDF membrane was incubated in blocking buffer (Tris-buffered saline, 1% tween, 10% skim milk) at room temperature (RT) for 1 h and incubated with the anti-NKA antibody (1.5 µg/mL) at 4 °C overnight. On the following day, the PVDF membrane was washed three times (10 min each) in Tris-buffered saline + 1% tween (TBS-T), incubated in goat anti-mouse HRP-linked secondary antibodies (1:10,000, Bio-Rad) at RT for 1 h and washed three times (10 min each) in TBS-T. Protein bands were made visible using ClarityTM Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad), and imaged and analyzed in a Bio-Rad Universal III Hood using ImageQuant software (Bio-Rad) (JPG 219 KB)
360_2018_1187_MOESM3_ESM.jpg (45.7 mb)
Supplementary material 3: Method for quantification of cutaneous ionocytes in yellowfin tuna larvae and early-stage juveniles > 5 m SL. Ionocytes were identified by their intense Na+/K+-ATPase immunostaining and counted within randomly sampled boxes of the overlaid grid within the head (green), trunk (pink), and fin (blue) regions. Dashed white lines outline regions that were not sampled due to heavy pigmentation preventing accurate ionocyte counts (JPG 46748 KB)
360_2018_1187_MOESM4_ESM.jpg (470 kb)
Supplementary material 4: Cutaneous ionocyte area relative to total skin surface area through larval yellowfin tuna development (n = 18) in relation to accumulated thermal units (linear regression: F1,16 = 42.54; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.7267). The black line shows the linear regression curve and dotted lines denote 95% confidence levels. Error bars (gray) denote standard error of the mean. Ionocyte absence in gills, presence in the gill filaments, and presence in interlamellar fusions and in the gill filaments is noted as a square, circle, and triangle, respectively (JPG 470 KB)

References

  1. Alderdice DF (1988) Osmotic and ionic regulation in teleost eggs and larvae. In: Fish physiology. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 163–251Google Scholar
  2. Alory G, Maes C, Delcroix T, Reul N, Illig S (2012) Seasonal dynamics of sea surface salinity off Panama: the far eastern Pacific fresh pool. J Geophys Res Ocean 117:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose DA (1996) Scombridae: mackerels and tunas. In: Moser H (ed) The stages of fishes in the California current region, Calif. Coop. Ocean. Fish. Inves. Lawrence, Kansas, pp 1270–1285Google Scholar
  4. Ayson FG, Kaneko T, Hasegawa S, Hirano T (1994) Development of mitochondrion-rich cells in the yolk-sac membrane of embryos and larvae of tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus, in fresh water and seawater. J Exp Zool 270:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402700202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodinier C, Sucré E, Lecurieux-Belfond L, Blondeau-Bidet E, Charmantier G (2010) Ontogeny of osmoregulation and salinity tolerance in the gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 157:220–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.06.185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehlert GW, Mundy BC (1994) Vertical and onshore-offshore distributional patterns of tuna larvae in relation to physical habitat features. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehlert GW, Watson W, Sun LC (1992) Horizontal and vertical distributions of larval fishes around an isolated oceanic island in the tropical Pacific. Deep Res 39:439–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90082-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown P (1992) Gill chloride cell surface-area is greater in freshwater-adapted adult sea trout (Salmo trutta, L.) than those adapted to sea water. J Fish Biol 40:481–484.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02596.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown CE, Muir BS (1970) Analysis of ram ventilation of fish gills with application to skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis). J Fish Res Board Can 27:1637–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f70-184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans DH (2002) Cell signaling and ion transport across the fish gill epithelium. J Exp Zool 293:336–347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.10128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans DH, Keys A (2008) Teleost fish osmoregulation: what have we learned since August Krogh, Homer Smith. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol 295:R704–R713.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90337.2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans D, Piermarini P, Potts W (1999) Ionic transport in the fish gill epithelium. J Exp Zool 283, 641–652.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990601)283:7%3C641::AID-JEZ3%3E3.0.CO;2-W.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans DH, Piermarini PM, Choe KP (2005) The multifunctional fish gill: dominant site of gas exchange, osmoregulation, acid-base regulation, and excretion of nitrogenous waste. Physiol Rev 85:97–177.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00050.2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin CE (1990) Surface ultrastructural changes in the gills of sockeye salmon (teleostei: Oncorhynchus nerka) during seawater transfer: comparison of successful and unsuccessful seawater adaptation. J Morphol 206:13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052060103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galland G, Rogers A, Nickson A (2016) Netting billions: a global valuation of tuna. Pew Charitible Trust, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  16. Goss GG, Laurent P, Perry SF (1992a) Evidence for a morphological component in acid-base regulation during environmental hypercapnia in the brown bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus). Cell Tissue Res 268:539–552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goss GG, Perry SF, Wood CM, Laurent P (1992b) Mechanisms of ion and acid-base regulation at the gills of freshwater fish. J Exp Zool 263:143–159.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402630205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goss GG, Laurent P, Perry SF (1994) Gill morphology during hypercapnia in brown bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus): role of chloride cells and pavement cells in acid-base regulation. J Fish Biol 45:705–718.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb00938.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirai N, Tagawa M, Kaneko T, Seikai T, Tanaka M (1999) Distributional changes in branchial chloride cells during freshwater adaptation in Japanese sea bass Lateolabrax japonicus. Zool Sci 16:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.16.43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiroi J, Kaneko T, Seikai T, Tanaka M (1998) Developmental sequence of chloride cells in the body skin and gills of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) larvae. Zool Sci 15:455–460Google Scholar
  21. Hiroi J, Kaneko T, Tanaka M (1999) In vivo sequential changes in chloride cell morphology in the yolk-sac membrane of Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) embyros and larvae during seawater adaptation. J Exp Biol 202:3485–3495Google Scholar
  22. Hirose S, Kaneko T, Naito N, Takei Y (2003) Molecular biology of major components of chloride cells. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 136:593–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00287-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holliday FGT (1969) The effects of salinity on the eggs and larvae of teleosts. In: Fish physiology. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 293–311Google Scholar
  24. Hughes GM (1970) Morphological measurements on the gills of fishes in relation to their respiratory function. Folia Morph 18:78–95Google Scholar
  25. Kaji T, Tanaka M, Oka M, Takeuchi H, Ohsumi S, Teruya K, Hirokawa J (1999) Growth and morphological development of laboratory-reared Yellowfin Tuna Thunnus albacares and early juveniles, with special emphasis on the digestive system. Fish Sci 65, 700–707.  https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.65.700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katoh F, Shimizu A, Uchida K, Kaneko T (2000) Shift of chloride cell distribution during early life stages in seawater-adapted killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Zool Sci 17:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katoh F, Hyodo S, Kaneko T (2003) Vacuolar-type proton pump in the basolateral plasma membrane energizes ion uptake in branchial mitochondria-rich cells of killifish Fundulus heteroclitus, adapted to a low ion environment. J Exp Biol 206:793–803.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King JAC, Hossler FE (1991) The gill arch of the striped bass (Morone saxatilis). IV. Alterations in the ultrastructure of chloride cell apical crypts and chloride efflux following exposure to seawater. J Morphol 209:165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052090204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laurent P, Dunel-Erb S (1984) The pseudobranch: morphology and function. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (ed) Gills. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 285–323Google Scholar
  30. Laurent P, Hebibi N (1989) Gill morphometry and fish osmoregulation. Can J Zool 67:3055–3063.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z89-429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lauth RR, Olson RJ (1996) Distribution and abundance of larval Scombridae in relation to the physical environment in the northwestern Panama Bight. InterAm Trop Tuna Comm Bull 21:127–167Google Scholar
  32. Lebovitz RM, Takeyasu K, Fambrough DM (1989) Molecular characterization and expression of the (Na++ K+)-ATPase alpha-subunit in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J 8:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leino RL, McCormick JH (1984) Morphological and morphometrical changes in chloride cells of the gills of Pimephales promelas after chronic exposure to acid water. Cell Tissue Res 236:121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00216521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leis JM, Trnski T, Vivien MH-, Renon J, Dufour V, Moudni KE, Galzin R (1991) High concentrations of tuna larvae (Pisces: Scombridae) in near-reef waters of French Polynesia (Society and Tuamotu Islands). Bull Mar Sci 48:150–158Google Scholar
  35. Margulies D (1997) Development of the visual system and inferred performance capabilities of larval and early juvenile scombrids. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 30:75–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10236249709379018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Margulies D, Wexler JB, Bentler KT, Suter JM, Masuma S, Tezuka N, Teruya K, Oka M, Kanematsu M, Nikaido H (2001) Early life history studies of Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. InterAm Trop Tuna Comm Bull 22:9–20Google Scholar
  37. Margulies D, Suter JM, Hunt SL, Olson RJ, Scholey VP, Wexler JB, Nakazawa A (2007) Spawning and early development of captive Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares). Fish Bull 105:249–265Google Scholar
  38. Margulies D, Scholey VP, Wexler JB, Stein MS (2016) Research on the reproductive biology and early life history of Yellowfin Tuna Thunnus albacares in Panama. In: Advances in Tuna Aquaculture: From Hatchery to Market. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 77–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall WS, Nishioka RS (1980) Relation of mitochondria-rich chloride cells to active chloride transport in the skin of a marine teleost. J Exp Zool 214:147–156.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402140204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masroor W, Farcy E, Gros R, Lorin-Nebel C (2018) Effect of combined stress (salinity and temperature) in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax osmoregulatory processes. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 215:45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitrovic D, Dymowska A, Nilsson GE, Perry SF (2009) Physiological consequences of gill remodeling in goldfish (Carassius auratus) during exposure to long-term hypoxia. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol 297:R224–R234.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00189.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muir BS (1970) Contribution to the study of blood pathways in teleost gills. Copeia 1970:19  https://doi.org/10.2307/1441971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muir BS, Brown CE (1971) Effects of blood pathway on the blood-pressure drop in fish gills, with special reference to tunas. J Fish Res Board Can 28:947–955.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f71-140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muir BS, Hughes GM (1969) Gill dimensions for three species of tunny. J Exp Biol 51:271–285Google Scholar
  45. Muir BS, Kendall JI (1968) Structural modifications in the gills of tunas and some other oceanic fishes. Copeia 1968:388  https://doi.org/10.2307/1441767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olson KR, Dewar H, Graham JB, Brill RW (2003) Vascular anatomy of the gills in a high energy demand teleost, the skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis). J Exp Zool 297A:17–31.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.10262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orange CJ (1961) Spawning of yellowfin tuna and skipjack in the eastern tropical Pacific, as inferred from studies of gonad development. InterAm Trop Tuna Comm Bull 5:459–526Google Scholar
  48. Owen RW (1997) Oceanographic atlas of habitats of larval tunas in the Pacific Ocean off the Azuero Peninsula, Panama. InterAm Trop Tuna Comm Data Rep 9:1–32Google Scholar
  49. Palzenberger M, Pohla H (1992) Gill surface area of water-breathing freshwater fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2:187–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perry SF, Goss GG (1994) The effects of experimentally altered gill chloride cell-surface area on acid-base regulation in rainbow trout during metabolic alkalosis. J Comp Physiol B Biochem Syst Environ Physiol 327–336  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346451
  51. Richards WJ, Dove GR (1971) Internal development of young tunas of the genera Katsuwonus, Euthynnus, Auxis, and Thunnus (Pisces, Scombridae). Copeia 1971:72  https://doi.org/10.2307/1441600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ricker W (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fish Res Board Can 191:382Google Scholar
  53. Rixen T, Jiménez C, Cortés J (2012) Impact of upwelling events on the sea water carbonate chemistry and dissolved oxygen concentration in the Gulf of Papagayo (Culebra Bay), Costa Rica: implications for coral reefs. Rev Biol Trop 60:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roa JN, Munévar CL, Tresguerres M (2014) Feeding induces translocation of vacuolar proton ATPase and pendrin to the membrane of leopard shark (Triakis semifasciata) mitochondrion-rich gill cells. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol 174:29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts J (1975) Active branchial and ram gill ventilation in fishes. Biol Bull 148:85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts RJ, Bell M, Young H (1973) Studies on the skin of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). II. The development of larval plaice skin. J Fish Biol 5:103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1973.tb04435.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rombough P (2007) The functional ontogeny of the teleost gill: which comes first, gas or ion exchange? Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 148:732–742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sasai S, Kaneko T, Hasegawa S, Tsukamoto K (1998) Morphological alteration in two types of gill chloride cells in Japanese eels (Anguilla japonica) during catadromous migration. Can J Zool 76:1480–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z98-072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schaefer KM (2001) Reproductive biology of tunas. In: Block BA, Stevens ED (eds) Tuna: physiology, ecology, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 225–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9:676  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schreiber AM (2001) Metamorphosis and early larval development of the flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes): an osmoregulatory perspective. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 129:587–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00346-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shelbourne JE (1957) Site of chloride regulation in marine fish larvæ. Nature 180:920–922.  https://doi.org/10.1038/180920a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevens E (1972) Some aspects of gas exchange in tuna. J Exp Biol 56:809–823Google Scholar
  64. Stevens ED, Lightfoot EN (1986) Hydrodynamics of water flow in front of and through the gills of skipjack tuna. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol 83:255–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(86)90571-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sucré E, Vidussi F, Mostajir B, Charmantier G, Lorin-Nebel C (2012) Impact of ultraviolet-B radiation on planktonic fish larvae: alteration of the osmoregulatory function. Aquat Toxicol 109:194–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tanaka M, Kaji T, Nakamura Y, Takahashi Y (1996) Developmental strategy of scombrid larvae: high growth potential related to food habits and precocious digestive system development. In: Watanabe Y, Yamashita Y, Oozeki Y (eds) Survival strategies in early life stages of marine resources. A A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 125–139Google Scholar
  67. Tang CH, Leu MY, Yang WK, Tsai SC (2014) Exploration of the mechanisms of protein quality control and osmoregulation in gills of Chromis viridis in response to reduced salinity. Fish Physiol Biochem 40:1533–1546.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-014-9946-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Uchida K, Kaneko T (1996) Enhanced chloride cell turnover in the gills of Chum Salmon fry in seawater. Zool Sci 13:655–660.  https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.13.655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Heijden AJH, van der Meij JCA, Flik G, Wendelaar Bonga SE (1999) Ultrastructure and distribution dynamics of chloride cells in tilapia larvae in fresh water and sea water. Cell Tissue Res 297:119–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410051339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Varsamos S, Connes R, Diaz JP, Charmantier G, Dicentrarchus L (2001) Ontogeny of osmoregulation in the European sea bass. Mar Biol 138:909–915.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Varsamos S, Diaz J, Charmantier G, Blasco C, Connes R, Flik G (2002a) Location and morphology of chloride cells during the post-embryonic development of the European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Anat Embryol (Berl) 205:203–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-002-0231-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Varsamos S, Diaz JP, Charmantier GUY, Flik G, Blasco C, Connes R (2002b) Branchial chloride cells in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) adapted to fresh water, seawater, and doubly concentrated seawater. J Exp Zool 293:12–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.10099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varsamos S, Nebel C, Charmantier G (2005) Ontogeny of osmoregulation in postembryonic fish: a review. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 141:401–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wegner NC, Sepulveda CA, Graham JB (2006) Gill specializations in high-performance pelagic teleosts, with reference to striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax) and wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri). Bull Mar Sci 79:747–759Google Scholar
  75. Wegner NC, Sepulveda CA, Bull KB, Graham JB (2010) Gill morphometrics in relation to gas transfer and ram ventilation in high-energy demand teleosts: Scombrids and billfishes. J Morphol 271:36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wegner NC, Lai NC, Bull KB, Graham JB (2012) Oxygen utilization and the branchial pressure gradient during ram ventilation of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus: is lamnid shark-tuna convergence constrained by elasmobranch gill morphology? J Exp Biol 215:22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.060095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wegner NC, Sepulveda CA, Aalbers SA, Graham JB (2013) Structural adaptations for ram ventilation: gill fusions in scombrids and billfishes. J Morphol 274:108–120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wexler JB, Margulies D, Masuma S, Tezuka N, Teruya K, Oka M, Kanematsu M, Nikaido H (2001) Age validation and growth of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, larvae reared in the laboratory. InterAm Trop Tuna Comm Bull 22:52–71Google Scholar
  79. Wexler JB, Scholey VP, Olson RJ, Margulies D, Nakazawa A, Suter JM (2003) Tank culture of Yellowfin Tuna, Thunnus albacares: developing a spawning population for research purposes. Aquaculture 220:327–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00429-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wexler JB, Chow S, Wakabayashi T, Nohara K, Margulies D (2007) Temporal variation in growth of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) larvae in the Panama Bight, 1990–97. Fish Bull 105:1–18Google Scholar
  81. Wexler JB, Margulies D, Scholey VP (2011) Temperature and dissolved oxygen requirements for survival of Yellowfin Tuna, Thunnus albacares, larvae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 404:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Whitear M (1970) The skin surface of bony fishes. J Zool 160:437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson JM, Randall DJ, Donowitz M, Vogl AW, Ip AK (2000) Immunolocalization of ion-transport proteins to branchial epithelium mitochondria-rich cells in the mudskipper (Periophthalmodon schlosseri). J Exp Biol 203:2297–2310Google Scholar
  84. Wilson JM, Whiteley NM, Randall DJ (2002) Ionoregulatory changes in the gill epithelia of coho salmon during seawater acclimation. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:237–249.  https://doi.org/10.1086/341817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zadunaisky JA (1996) Chloride cells and osmoregulation. Kidney Int 49:1563–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zydlewski J, McCormick SD (2001) Developmental and environmental regulation of chloride cells in young American shad, Alosa sapidissima. J Exp Zool 290:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Inter-American Tropical Tuna CommissionLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Fisheries Resources Division, Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNOAA FisheriesLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations