The response of claudin-like transmembrane septate junction proteins to altered environmental ion levels in the larval mosquito Aedes aegypti
- 265 Downloads
Septate junctions (SJs) occlude the paracellular pathway and function as paracellular diffusion barriers within invertebrate epithelia. However, integral components of SJs and their contribution to barrier properties have received considerably less attention than those of vertebrate occluding junctions. In arthropods, SJ proteins have only been identified in Drosophila and among these are three integral claudin-like proteins, Megatrachea (Mega), Sinuous (Sinu) and Kune-kune (Kune), as well as a receptor-like transmembrane SJ protein known as Neurexin IV (Nrx IV). In this study, mega, sinu, kune and nrx IV are identified and characterized in aquatic larvae of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and a role for these proteins in ionoregulatory homeostasis is considered. Transcripts encoding Mega, Sinu, Kune and Nrx IV were found in iono/osmoregulatory tissues such as the midgut, Malpighian tubules, hindgut and anal papillae, but abundance was greater in the hindgut and anal papillae. Using immunohistochemical and western blot analysis it was found that Kune localized to the regions of intercellular contact between epithelial cells of the rectum and posterior midgut and in the apical membrane domain of the syncytial epithelium of anal papillae. To investigate a potential role for integral SJ proteins in larval A. aegypti iono/osmoregulation, abundance was examined in animals reared in freshwater or brackish water (30 % seawater). In iono/osmoregulatory epithelia, larvae exhibited tissue-specific alterations in mega mRNA and Kune protein abundance, but not sinu or nrx IV mRNA. These studies provide a first look at the potential contribution of integral SJ components to iono/osmoregulatory homeostasis in an aquatic invertebrate.
KeywordsMosquito Osmoregulation Septate junctions Claudins Neurexin IV Salinity
This study was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grants to SPK and AD, an Ontario Graduate Scholarship to SJ. The authors would like to thank Dr. Mikio Furuse for anti-Kune antibody.
Compliance with ethical standards
No competing interests declared.
- Bradley TJ (1994) The role of physiological capacity, morphology, and phylogeny in determining habitat use in mosquitoes. In: Wainwright PC, Reilly SM (eds) Ecological morphology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 303–318Google Scholar
- Byri S, Misra T, Syed ZA, Bätz T, Shah J, Boril L, Glashauser J, Aegerter-Wilmsen T, Matzat T, Moussian B, Uv A, Luschnig S (2015) The triple-repeat protein anakonda controls epithelial tricellular junction formation in Drosophila. Dev Cell 33:535–548. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark TM, Hutchinson MJ, Huegel KL, Moffett SB, Moffett DF (2005) Additional morphological and physiological heterogeneity within the midgut of larval Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) revealed by histology, electrophysiology, and effects of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin. Tissue Cell 37:457–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clements AN (1992) The biology of mosquitoes, vol 1. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Edwards HA (1982) Aedes aegypti: energetics of osmoregulation. J Exp Biol 101:135–141Google Scholar
- Fournier ML, Paulson A, Pavelka N, Mosley AL, Gaudenz K, Bradford WD, Glynn E, Li H, Sardiu ME, Fleharty B, Seidel C, Florens L, Washburn MP (2010) Delayed correlation of mRNA and protein expression in rapamycin-treated cells and a role for Ggc1 in cellular sensitivity to rapamycin. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:271–284. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900415-MCP200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green CR, Bergquist PR (1982) Phylogentic relationships within the invertebrates in relation to the structure of septate junctions and the development of ‘occluding’ junctional types. J Cell Sci 53:279–305Google Scholar
- Lane NJ, Skaer HB (1980) Intercellular junctions in insect tissues. In: Berridge MJ, Treherne JE, Wigglesworth VB (eds) Advances in insect physiology, vol 15. Academic Press, London, pp 35–213Google Scholar