Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of methods for fitting allometric equations to field metabolic rates of animals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We re-examined data for field metabolic rates of varanid lizards and marsupial mammals to illustrate how different procedures for fitting the allometric equation can lead to very different estimates for the allometric coefficient and exponent. A two-parameter power function was obtained in each case by the traditional method of back-transformation from a straight line fitted to logarithms of the data. Another two-parameter power function was then generated for each data-set by non-linear regression on values in the original arithmetic scale. Allometric equations obtained by non-linear regression described the metabolic rates of all animals in the samples. Equations estimated by back-transformation from logarithms, on the other hand, described the metabolic rates of small species but not large ones. Thus, allometric equations estimated in the traditional way for field metabolic rates of varanids and marsupials do not have general importance because they do not characterize rates for species spanning the full range in body size. Logarithmic transformation of predictor and response variables creates new distributions that may enable investigators to perform statistical analyses in compliance with assumptions underlying the tests. However, statistical models fitted to transformations should not be used to estimate parameters of equations in the arithmetic domain because such equations may be seriously biased and misleading. Allometric analyses should be performed on values expressed in the original scale, if possible, because this is the scale of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht GH (1988) Simple allometry coefficients: fact or fiction. Am Zool 28:172A

    Google Scholar 

  • Asselman NEM (2000) Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves. J Hydrol 234:228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder WA III (1984) Size, Function, and Life History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson JD, Stoto MA (1983) Transforming data. In: Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (eds) Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 97–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ (1989) Was this in your statistics textbook? V. Transformation of data. Exp Agric 25:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass NR (1969) Discussion of calculation of power function with special reference to respiratory metabolism in fish. J Fish Res Bd Can 26:2643–2650

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig F, Dearing BE (1979) Exploratory data analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JP, Shonkwiler JS (2006) Allometry, antilog transformations, and the perils of prediction on the original scale. Physiol Biochem Zool 79:665–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui D, Jackson RB (2007) Uncertainty in allometric exponent estimation: A case study in scaling metabolic rate with body mass. J Theoret Biol 249:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson M (1985) A comparison of detransformed logarithmic regressions and power function regressions. Geograf Annal 67A:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression models, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera M (1989) Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manaster BJ, Manaster S (1975) Techniques for estimating allometric equations. J Morphol 147:299–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Indust Appl Math 11:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH, Leahy RB, Johnson PA (1990) Problems with logarithmic transformations in regression. J Hydraul Eng 116:414–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DR (1984) Reducing transformation bias in curve fitting. Am Stat 38:124–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2004) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH (1986) Classical and modern regression with applications. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy KA (2005) Field metabolic rate and body size. J Exp Biol 208:1621–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy KA, Girard IA, Brown TK (1999) Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Annu Rev Nutr 19:247–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne JW (2002) Notes on the use of data transformations. Pract Assess Res Eval 8(6)

  • Packard GC, Boardman TJ (2008a) Model selection and logarithmic transformation in allometric analysis. Physiol Biochem Zool 81:496–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Packard GC, Boardman TJ (2008b) Bias in interspecific allometry: examples from morphological scaling in varanid lizards. Biol J Linn Soc (in press)

  • Pandey GR, Nguyen V-T-V (1999) A comparative study of regression based methods in regional flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 225:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage VM, Gillooly JF, Woodruf WH, West GB, Allen AP, Enquist BJ, Brown JH (2004) The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. Funct Ecol 18:257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) Scaling/why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (1984) Allometric scaling in comparative biology: problems of concept and method. Am J Physiol 246:R152–R160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (1993) Logarithmic transformation bias in allometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 90:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee RD (1977) Validation of regression models: methods and examples. Technometrics 19:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West GB, Brown JH (2005) The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization. J Exp Biol 208:1575–1592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White CR, Seymour RS (2005) Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism. J Exp Biol 208:1611–1619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1968) Calculation and miscalculation of the allometric equation as a model in biological data. Bioscience 18:1118–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Martin Feder, Albert Bennett, Warren Burggren, and Raymond Huey for encouraging us to undertake a critical evaluation of the methods of allometry. We also thank Geoffrey Birchard and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary C. Packard.

Additional information

Communicated by I. D. Hume.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packard, G.C., Boardman, T.J. A comparison of methods for fitting allometric equations to field metabolic rates of animals. J Comp Physiol B 179, 175–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-008-0300-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-008-0300-x

Keywords

Navigation