Abstract
We developed a sound discrimination device to identify and localize the species of nocturnal animals in their natural habitat. The sound discrimination device is equipped with a microphone, a light-emitting diode, and a band-pass filter. By tuning the center frequency of the filter to include a dominant frequency of the calls of a focal species, we enable the device to be illuminated only when detecting the calls of the focal species. In experiments in a laboratory room, we tuned the sound discrimination devices to detect the calls of Hyla japonica or Rhacophorus schlegelii and broadcast the frog calls from loudspeakers. By analyzing the illumination pattern of the devices, we successfully identified and localized the two kinds of sound sources. Next, we placed the sound discrimination devices in a field site where actual male frogs (H. japonica and R. schlegelii) produced sounds. The analysis of the illumination pattern demonstrates the efficacy of the developed devices in a natural environment and also enables us to extract pairs of male frogs that significantly overlapped or alternated their calls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aihara I (2009) Modeling synchronized calling behavior of Japanese tree frogs. Phys Rev E 80:011918
Aihara I, Takeda R, Mizumoto T, Otsuka T, Takahashi T, Okuno HG, Aihara K (2011) Complex and transitive synchronization in a frustrated system of calling frogs. Phys Rev E 83:031913
Aihara I, Mizumoto T, Otsuka T, Awano H, Nagira K, Okuno HG, Aihara K (2014) Spatio-temporal dynamics in collective frog choruses examined by mathematical modeling and field observations. Sci Rep 4:3891
Aihara I, de Silva P, Bernal XE (2016a) Acoustic preference of frog-biting midges (Corethrella spp) attacking tungara frogs in their natural habitat. Ethology 122:105–113
Aihara I, Mizumoto T, Awano H, Okuno HG (2016b) Call alternation between specific pairs of male frogs revealed by a sound-imaging method in their natural habitat. Proc of INTERSPEECH 2016, San Francisco, pp 2597–2601
Aihara I, Bishop PJ, Ohmer ME, Awano H, Mizumoto T, Okuno HG, Narins PM, Hero JM (2017) Visualizing phonotactic behavior of female frogs in darkness. Sci Rep 7:10539
Aihara I, Kominami D, Hirano Y, Murata M (2019) Mathematical modelling and application of frog choruses as an autonomous distributed communication system. Royal Society Open Science 6(1):181117
Au WWL, Herzing DL (2003) Echolocation signals of wild Atlantic spotted dolphin (Stenella frontalis). J Acoust Soc Am 113:598–604
Bando Y, Otsuka T, Aihara I, Awano H, Itoyama K, Yoshii K, Okuno HG (2015) Recognition of in-field frog chorusing using Bayesian nonparametric microphone array processing. Technical Report of Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (WS-15-06), 2–6
Bee MA, Schwartz JJ, Summers K (2013) All’s well that begins Wells: celebrating 60 years of animal behaviour and 36 years of research on anuran social behaviour. Anim Behav 85:5–18
Brush JS, Narins PM (1989) Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour. Anim Behav 37–1:33–44
Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fujioka E, Aihara I, Watanabe S, Sumiya M, Hiryu S, Simmons JA, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2014) Rapid shifts of sonar attention by Pipistrellus abramus during natural hunting for multiple prey. J Acoust Soc Am 136:3389–3400
Fujioka E, Aihara I, Sumiya M, Aihara K, Hiryu S (2016) Echolocating bats use future target information for optimal foraging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4848–4852
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Grafe TU (1997) Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus. Anim Behav 53:1103–1117
Greenfield MD, Rand AS (2000) Frogs have rules: selective attention algorithms regulate chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae). Ethology 106:331–347
Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark: the acoustic orientation of bats and men. Yale University Press, Oxford
Jones DL, Jones RL, Ratnam R (2014) Calling dynamics and call synchronization in a local group of unison bout callers. J Comp Physiol A 200–1:93–107
Kanji GK (2006) 100 statistical tests, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, London
Legett HD, Page RA, Bernal XE (2019) Synchronized mating signals in a communication network: the challenge of avoiding predators while attracting mates. Proc R Soc B 286:20191067
Madsen P, Wahlberg M, Mohl B (2002) Male sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) acoustics in a high-latitude habitat: implications for echolocation and communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:31–41
Maeda N, Matsui M (1999) Frogs and toads of Japan. Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan Co., Ltd., Tokyo
Mizumoto T, Aihara I, Otsuka T, Takeda R, Aihara K, Okuno HG (2011) Sound imaging of nocturnal animal calls in their natural habitat. J Comp Physiol A 197:915–921
Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR (2007) Hearing and sound communication in amphibians. Springer Science and Business Media, New York
Ota K, Aihara I, Aoyagi T (2020) Interaction mechanisms quantified from dynamical features of frog choruses. Royal Soc Open Sci 7(3):191693
Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M, Kurths J (2001) Synchronization: a universal concept in nonlinear sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rhinehart TA, Chronister LM, Devlin T (2020) Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: current practices and future opportunities. Ecol Evol 00:1–25
Schwartz JJ (1987) The function of call alternation in anuran amphibians: a test of three hypotheses. Evolution 41:461–471
Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983) An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Anim Behav 31:181–190
Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1984a) Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:211–224
Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1984b) Vocal behavior of the neotropical treefrog Hyla phlebodes. Herpetologica 40:452–463
Simmons AM, Simmons JA, Bates ME (2008) Analyzing acoustic interactions in natural bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) choruses. J Comp Psychol 122:274–282
Sumitani S, Suzuki R, Matsubayashi S, Arita T, Nakadai K, Okuno HG (2020) Fine-scale observations of spatio-spectro-temporal dynamics of bird vocalizations using robot audition techniques. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.152
Suzuki R, Matsubayashi S, Saito F, Murate T, Masuda T, Yamamoto K, Kojima R, Nakadai K, Okuno HG (2018) A spatiotemporal analysis of acoustic interactions between great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) using microphone arrays and robot audition software HARK. Ecol Evol 8:812–825
Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Y. Bando and K. Itoyama for valuable comments on the development of the sound discrimination device, T. Ishimaru for editing the demonstration videos of our field recording, Y. Bando for providing the data of inter-call intervals in male R. schlegelii from his previous study, and N. Hirohashi and M. Yoshida in Marine Biological Science Section, Shimane University, Japan, for their kind support with field recording. We also appreciate two anonymous reviewers providing valuable comments that greatly helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was partially supported by Konica Minolta Science and Technology Foundation to H.A. and I. A., JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research (No. 16K12396), Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (No. 18K18005) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (No.20H04144) to I.A., and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (No. 2422006) to H.G.O.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA, TM, HGO and IA designed the research; HA developed the device; MS and IA performed the laboratory experiments; HA and IA prepared and performed the field recording; HA, MS and IA analyzed the data; HA, MS, TM, HGO, and IA wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare we have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The field recording in this study was performed in accordance with the guideline of the Animal Experimental Committee of University of Tsukuba.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 14097 KB)
Supplementary file2 (MP4 8823 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Awano, H., Shirasaka, M., Mizumoto, T. et al. Visualization of a chorus structure in multiple frog species by a sound discrimination device. J Comp Physiol A 207, 87–98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-021-01463-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-021-01463-9